Sentences with phrase «other commenters questioned»

Other commenters questioned the study's categories, methods, and even the religious beliefs of its authors.

Not exact matches

As for why your questions may be disappearing, they may have rules against such speculations about other commenters.

So when I saw this post yesterday on Tony Jones» support page on Scribd, I immediately received it as a passive - aggressive attempt to silence people... Julie, me, and all other bloggers and commenters who have spoken or written in a way that raises questions about those in power.

Disagree if you wish, but please do not attack, call names or question the relationship of other commenters to Jesus.

Following the attempts by some of the commenters (from both sides of the debate) to get simple «yes» and «no» answers from each other to theological questions, I have a REAL LIFE situation to pose to the readers of this blog, and I want you to state with a simple «Yes» or «No» whether you believe the following woman is saved or not.

I have the same question as one other commenter... where / how do you get crunchy brown quinoa?

I went through all of the comments and gathered the ones that covered most of the questions / interesting adaptions and helpful info posted from all the other commenters.

A few commenters on the Strollerderby post, They Say: Spanking Makes Your Kid Mean, a Bit Dumb, question how scientific this study was and if other variables could have played a role in the aggressiveness of the children.

I have a question for you and the other commenters.

However, I have lots of questions, some similar to the other commenters.

Chris O'Byrne is a frequent commenter here and has provided some in - depth help for other readers on questions with Adobe InDesign.

I did go and read your «Next Generation Questions» post, and I don't think it particularly rude of other commenters here to point out that much of it was clueless.

What I do not understand is why people play the Judith Curry style game of creating several posts filled with other people's quotations, making up hypothetical graphs, asking questions to the commenters, and playing ¨ what if ¨ scenarios in their head, only to back off and play the ¨ I'm innocent ¨ card when someone tries to call them out on the bulls ** t.

I notice that it took me, an amateur with no professional qualifications directly related to climate science, only moments to independently identify multiple weaknesses in the questions, the same weaknesses that other commenters have pointed out.

Mr McIntyre: Im sorry that this commenter's language was too intemperate... However, the use of tree rings as a proxy for temperature, when one can not control for the myriad of other factors that influence tree growth, brings into question the entire enterprise, no?

Then again, many other commenters are equally useful in their «non-scientific» appraisal sometimes — because they have not been classicially science «influenced» and can often ask / probe the right questions.

Meanwhile Gavin and the other members of the Team at the Real Climate (RC) blog have gone into overdrive in moderating any commenter who ask any reasonable questions about all of this.

Your inability, so far, to provide the answers to these questions completely undermines all your complaints about the scientists who run this website and the ideas of other commenters here.

The question generated a good deal of discussion: Most commenters praised the advantages of Macs over PCs; others reasoned that Macs hadn't gained more traction in the legal profession because law schools push PC technology, and bar associations haven't done more to educate lawyers about Macs» ability to protect client data from viruses.

Second, many commenters were confused by the statutory inclusion as a health plan of any «other individual or group plan that provides or pays the cost of medical care;» they questioned how the provision applied to many government programs.

Comment: Numerous commenters addressed directly or by implication the question of whether the provision permitting uses and disclosures of protected health information if required by other law was necessary.

Comment: One commenter questioned under what circumstances proposed § 164.510 (k) would apply instead of proposed § 164.510 (f)(5), «Urgent Circumstances,» which permitted covered entities to disclose protected health information to law enforcement officials about individuals who are or are suspected to be victims of a crime, abuse, or other harm, if the law enforcement official represents that the information is needed to determine whether a violation of law by a person other than the victim has occurred and immediate law enforcement activity that depends upon obtaining such information may be necessary.

Some have asked about cases, some about widgets... In fact, I've answered so many questions about my wallpaper since the last time I changed it that some commenters are even starting to answer others for me, which has been great, and kind of hilarious.

I had lots of question for you but you already answered them in replying to other commenters so I'll just say great post.

On the other hand, many settlement agent commenters questioned whether the creditor would act in the best interests of the consumer or other parties, such as sellers.

These commenters also questioned the definition of «loan costs» in comment 37 (l)(1)(i)-1 which defines loan costs as costs disclosed under § 1026.37 (f), arguing that the amount disclosed would be overstated because the definition does not account for credits provided by the creditor, mortgage broker, seller, or other party.