Sentences with phrase «other critics today»

Not exact matches

Today's problems also are different from those which Marxists and other critics have long denounced.

This is not about a Clarence Thomas, or a Glenn Loury, or any other black critic of today's orthodoxy.

With one ear to Scripture and the other to our unchurched critics, we want to see if there is anything in the church today which still reflects the abuses of the past.

That's what one of today's most vocal «grow the game» proponents acknowledged on Wednesday when he defended Rory McIlroy against critics who bash him and other top male players for skipping the Olympics.

Why can't people for God sake understand the angle the young man was coming from, this is a guy who has come out to suggest what he feel will be of great glory to the team, futbol is about winning trophy not the samba, champaign, tick taka or jambody style Of playwill be accredited to ur cv after retirement, every professional player will wants to be identify with a medal, mind you he have limited years to his career, therefore we should not allow sentment or affections we have for our various teams erode the basic objective of the game.we should also think about their future too, this guys are proffessionals which young lads are looking up to and questions will be ask tomorrow about theirs playing days.can people tell me why pele and some other famous players in the world both present and past are been celebrated today the answer is simply cos they are successful in their career and have trophy to show for it in their respective clubs or countries, why the complain in nigeria?its simply cos our team for quite a while now has not recorded any troph to her glory, fans should learn how to call a spade a spade in order to balance situation and also for better performance of the team.why then did arsene wenger hurridly went to buy more experienced players after the poor outing he had at the beggining of last season?this players know beta cos they are at the centre of it all, we don't have to trash what they say, we fans are only watching from screen, in as much as we beliv in arsen wenger, we should also know that without the boys no arsen wenger, fans should try to reason along with the players too.an hypotetical cases of similar to rvp has been tested by some players and have put them right over the coach and the team.so, whatelse does the fans needs to prove that futbol has gone beyond living in the past.for example, fabrigas and nasri were able to prove their critics wrong.thank God for them, we should always be objective in our submission, how else do we expect players to show their commitment to a team that was in 8 on the log table and later fought their way back to 3rd this boys are commendable and deserve to be encouraged, I think is high time the manager and the mgt board of arsenal futbol team get to know that game of futbol has gone beyond two teams domination, its now like a pendilum which can swing either way only with a powerful insrument called money.you can't eat ur cake and have.

As Gooners we get more stick than any other fans out there due to the way the media portrays us and today was like putting a foot in every critics mouth.

In other words, a movie's significance is decided by today's and tomorrow's film directors — not the critics.

New York today put Carol front and center in a way that no other critics group could do when the NYFCC named Todd Haynes and his masterful love story Best Picture and Director of the year.

The Chicago Film Critics Association — of which Brian Tallerico is the Vice President and Chaz Ebert, Matt Fagerholm, Nick Allen, and Peter Sobczynski are members, among other regular contributors — announced their nominees today for the best films of 2017.

The Austin Film Critics Association (AFCA) announced its 2014 awards today, with Austin filmmaker Richard Linklater's feature «Boyhood» winning Best Film, Best Director, and two other awards, as well as leading the group's Top Ten list.

Just today it was nominated for Best Picture and four other awards by the Broadcast Critics Film Association's Critics» Choice Awards.

There are already four eligible animated features clearly better received by critics, with Puss in Boots becoming # 5 today and others yet to come.

Leenhardt was a film critic and filmmaker of real distinction, though he's as forgotten today in France as he is unknown in the states; the clip, unidentified like all the others, comes from Godard's 1965 feature A Married Woman.

Other critics, like Entertainment Weekly and USA Today were quick to note that while the film is undeniably fun, it doesn't always take itself seriously enough.

In 2016, long - time New York magazine art critic Jerry Saltz even declared the once - scorned 1993 Whitney Biennial, which Golden organized with two other curators, «the moment in which today's art world was born.»

We discuss, among other topics, about photography in the Middle East with Peggy Sue Amison, artistic director at East Wing; net art and networked cultures with Josephine Bosma, Amsterdam - based journalist and critic; urban digital art and criticality in the media city with curator and researcher Tanya Toft; art and technology with curator Chris Romero; the politics of surveillance and international security with political scientist David Barnard - Wills; art and architecture with Maaike Lauwaert, visual arts curator at Stroom, an independent centre for art and architecture in the Netherlands; the intersections of art, law and science with curator and cultural manager Daniela Silvestrin; the architecture of sacred places with curator Jumana Ghouth; the historical legacy of feminism today with Betty Tompkins and Marilyn Minter; hacktivism and net culture with curator and researcher Tatiana Bazzichelli; culture, place and memory with Norie Neumark, director of the Centre for Creative Arts in Melbourne; anthropology and the tactical use of post-digital technologies with artist and philosopher Mitra Azar; or feminism and the digital arts with curator Tina Sauerländer.

Such arguments set the parameters by which Rockwell and other realists were judged by modernist art critics at the time, and by some art commentators today.

Another analytic philosopher less well known to today's critics, Nelson A. Goodman, independently pursued the same question in Languages of Art and other books.

The symposium, Mapplethorpe + 25, will revolve around this revitalized interest in Mapplethorpe as curators, artists, critics and others explore the broad question: what does Mapplethorpe's work tell us about the culture we have inherited and inhabit today?

And today, contemporary visual artists and critics from New York and other major metropolitan areas, who have been and continue to be at the forefront of a progressive, changing art world - Yvonne Jacquette, Alex Katz, Rudy Burkhardt, Jonathan Borofsky, Kenneth Noland, Neil Welliver, Robert Indiana, Lucy Lippard, William Wegman - come to Maine to refocus and refresh their work in an inspiring landscape.

This panel discussion will revolve around this revitalized interest in Mapplethorpe, as curators, artists, critics, and others explore the broader question: What does Mapplethorpe's work tell us about the culture we have inherited and inhabit today?

Further, in doing so Rose suggests how we might begin to analyze such work (on the basis of the quality of its argument, rather than of its form) so that other critics might amend their methodologies, which is why the text still feels relevant (if historically) today.