I believe the Lacazette story because it fits the Vardy profile and Lukaku because he had stated he needs champion league football, but
the other stories seem ridiculous
Not exact matches
Yet to my withered hippocampus, a
story I wrote two years earlier often
seems the work of some
other person; the knowledge I gathered in authoring it has ebbed away.
When a recording of Green Leader Elizabeth May
seeming to say Canadians are «stupid» popped up on the web, The Hook broke the
story that the Greens were calling the tape a fake and threatening to sue a blogger and
others over it.
The
other worry in these
stories seems to be that these investors are somehow doing the wrong thing, straying outside of their proper category, by investing in private rather than public companies.
The
story seems to make much of the fact that Peltz is a «hands - on» investor, so if something is prompting him to be liquidating $ 63 million of Heinz stock, then maybe
other shareholders should be concerned.
Authorship of John — many if not most NT scholars believe that John nor one of 12 wrote John; James — most agree not authored by James, and sometime in 2nd century AD; Peter — a mystery — some think that it could have been an early template for the
other gospels; Luke — a mystery; Mark — finally it
seems like we really might have another original author here — or were he and later Paul just using a very early Peter
story?
I think I'm too simple in my thinking that; if you don't like it, DO N'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it, DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY...
Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i s
Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force
others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read
stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family
seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i s
seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see...
And we have all watched you boldly take the way of abundance — no matter how it
seemed like it didn't matter — because God makes meaning out of messes, because He is the God who can make all our brokenness into abundance, because, you and I say this back to each
other over and over again: The Writer of the
story has written Himself into the hardest places of yours and is softening the broken edges of everything with redeeming, abundant grace.»
On the
other hand, I must admit that among young adults (myself included), there
seems to be an unhealthy appetite for
stories about the church that are exclusively negative.
I believe in the power of the blood of Jesus but now this leaves me afraid to admit it, for I'm already pegged as superstitious and into magic —
seems no different than the boogyman
stories my once conservative church tried to lay on me, that my protection is in their oversight, that if I leave them my life would be destroyed, and more — we must be careful in our ernest seeking after truth that we don't become what we have despised and that we don't put on
others our perspectives and understandings.
I think maybe that's why sharing our
stories with each
other can be a powerful thing because something revelatory or influential can come from so far out of our normal sphere that it might
seem like destiny or fate.
Stories that define a community different from the world around us because of the way these stories shape our self - understanding, a community that may sometimes be wildly radical politically and on other issues seem conservative, but will not let anyone else's vision set its
Stories that define a community different from the world around us because of the way these
stories shape our self - understanding, a community that may sometimes be wildly radical politically and on other issues seem conservative, but will not let anyone else's vision set its
stories shape our self - understanding, a community that may sometimes be wildly radical politically and on
other issues
seem conservative, but will not let anyone else's vision set its agenda.
It's pretty simple
stories that
seemed to perpetuate over time without any truth
other than what we invent.
It
seems like no matter where you turn these days, you run into countless
stories of injustice, suffering, pain, war, famine and
other atrocities that
seem to be plaguing our world.
Even when, like the characters in The
Story of the Night, they
seem to have fallen away from treating themselves, or their fellow human beings, with the appropriate respect, Jews and
others in today's counterculture committed to the mystery of human responsibility before God, and charged with the task of pursuing our own unique individual and communal destiny in a conformist, uncomprehending world, need such reminders.
You
seem to have highlighted particular sins as though some are worse than
others all sin leads to death not just the big ones because we all are sinners.All have gone astray none are righteous.I believe the worst sin is pride idolatry is the first commandment we set ourselves as Gods.Regardless of what the sin is, our hearts are condemned by our pride.It wasnt the sin of homosexuality or sexual deviance that destroyed sodom.It was there pride and it is one of our biggest stumbling blocks in our christian walk or it certainly was for me.We look at the
story of the adulterous woman and we think adultery is a terrible crime but the
story is for our benefit to show that we all are sinners that Jesus does nt condemn us but came to save us.And when Jesus says go and sin no more he was not only talking to the woman but everyone else that was around judging her for her sin its a universal message that we all need to see that we all are condemned because of our sin that Jesus came to save us and that we turn from our sin and follow him.Because he is the way the truth and the life.brentnz
If Jesus was not allegedly crucified then there could be no
story of death and rebirth, a theme which
seems to have been copied from several
other ancient religions that preceded Christianity.
The executive order
seemed especially peculiar when juxtaposed with
other stories on nature's inherent «unfairness,» such as a winter of record snowfall and the January earthquake in Los Angeles.
But none of this has stopped crusading «Christian» nations down to the present from using the Joshua
stories and
other support they
seem to find in the Bible for an unending stream of war and slaughter.
On the
other hand, I was surprised at his
seeming criticism of the Babar
stories, whose merit he saw as lying chiefly in the illustrations.
The details of this
story, on the
other hand,
seem incredible to modern man.
Not proven beyond a doubt but by referencing various written works by many of his «disciples» and
others (monks etc) over 600 years AD who all had the exact same
story though threatened with death etc it
seems HE did live.
I'm genuinely curious because I don't like the command to kill passages in the OT, but can't
seem to make sense of the
story any
other way without doing some serious mental gymnastics.
These
stories and
others like them
seem to indicate that a new and different type of political conflict has swept the nation.
Adherents of the new Christian sects, of which there were many competing ones, e.g., Ebonites, Gnostics, etc., would have been familiar with the Serapis and likely would not have wanted their godman to
seem any less impressive than the gods of the Serapis and
other religions of the time, so there would have been a need for a miraculous birth
story and
other miracle
stories for their godman, as well.
The threefold division into body, soul, and spirit, apparent in the New Testament,
seems to carry back into the Old as well, for one can easily assume that it is met with in the creation
stories, to speak of no
other.
For this as well as for
other reasons C. F. Evans is justified in saying that John's version «would
seem to represent an end - product of the development of the
story of the empty tomb».32
It
seemed that too many of the archaeological arguments advanced in support of the Bible
story were convincing only to those who wanted to be convinced, and the «archaeological solutions» to problematic historical questions tended to sidetrack the search for
other possible solutions.
There were
other issues too: The way the accounts of Israel's monarchy contradicted one another, the way Jesus and Paul quoted Hebrew Scripture in ways that
seemed to stretch the original meaning, the fact that women were considered property in Levitical Law, the way both science and archeology challenged the historicity of so many biblical texts, and the fact that it was nearly impossible for me to write a creative retelling of Resurrection Day because each of the gospel writers tell the
story so differently, sometimes with contradictory details.
The similarity in style and content between the
stories I knew from the Bible and the myths of
other Mesopotamian cultures suddenly made those strange tales of talking snakes and forbidden fruit and boats packed with animals
seem colloquial, routine — nothing more than myths operating from the religious and literary conventions of the day.
The second
story seems to have the Hindus up in arms against the book, looks like they (hindus) somehow feel that they have a free pass at criticizing
others here but when it comes to their own are very closed minded and fanatic.
The nice part of this
story is that man and monk have had a wonderful opportunity to relax, get to know each
other, develop some pleasant memories from what
seems to be a joyous heart to heart connect!
You
seem to solely exist in the realm of quotes, opinions of
others,
stories handed down to you by those who traveled the road before.
This general similarity between the two
stories does not necessarily mean that one
story was derived from the
other, although it
seems likely that both written accounts originated in the tenth century.
If your
stories, overtime,
seem useful to
others in particular circumstances, tell them, but don't allow your practice to dominate ordinary situations and everyday activities.
There were numerous times where fight scenes were completely unnecessary, and
other times where the fight scenes
seems to drag on and on, but then, they delete entire portions out of the Bible (such as all of Jacob's
story, the 40 years of wilderness wanderings, etc.) Couldn't they have cut out the fight scenes and included a scene or two from these
other crucial events?
It
seems like Pixar has a saner and healthier viewpoint than
other animators, and they turn out better
stories all around (though Cars was a bit of a disappointment in that regard ¯ only in comparison to the terrific earlier stuff, that is).
The whole Christmas
story, mingled as it is now with Santa Claus and
other more or less pagan additions,
seems much like a fairy tale for children.
Try expanding your narrow views to the
other religious tomes that exist in our world, you
seem to be hung up on the jesus
story.
Sometimes, everything about a blog post
other than the actual recipe and instructions
seems kinda like having to sit through some big distraction, when all you really want to hear are some circus
stories.
Both
stories seem plausible and there are probably many
others, so I guess we have to be content just with the fact that at least someone in America invented them.
We don't
seem to hear these
stories at R. M. Barca and
other big European teams.
fact; if wenger was a manager in any
other country hed have been replaced for his own safety.maybe the fans are part of the problem too, the journalsts
seem to be under his spell too comparinf the level of hostility jose and lvg have endured.well thats the curious
story of wenger and the brits who couldnt do s **** about him.i bet after a loss he reminds himself «i am arsenal nobody can do s **** about me, its never that serious!!»
Many
other stories have gone on and on through the transfer period, including for example Coquelin's transfer to Valencia — and of course it might still happen, but it
seems unlikely.
There have been rumours of a clash between Karanka and David Nugent but more reliable
stories seem to point to his concerns over
other players and their performances, notably Stewart Downing.
Having said that, the Sun «s article may just be a total transfer fart as it
seems they don't have any credible source to back up their
story other than the fact that Hazard could be leaving and Oxlade - Chamberlain is more often than not, on the Arsenal bench.
The more you hear the
stories of hope from
others who have been through the tough journey, the more it
seems to help to get through it yourself.
Completion of chores can unlock
other privileges (e.g., a special snack,
story, or game) or one thing we've done with Laurel is offer a small payment if she wants to do a task that
seems out of the ordinary.
But it
seems like every
other day there's another
story about a heroic single father who's somehow raising his kids on his own.
You're not as bad as some
others here... but there
seems to be some kind of subtext going on here where people are trying to «guess» my
story... tell me about myself and what I believe... or the worst... talk about me as if I'm not here reading the comments.