Sentences with phrase «other stories seem»

I believe the Lacazette story because it fits the Vardy profile and Lukaku because he had stated he needs champion league football, but the other stories seem ridiculous

Not exact matches

Yet to my withered hippocampus, a story I wrote two years earlier often seems the work of some other person; the knowledge I gathered in authoring it has ebbed away.
When a recording of Green Leader Elizabeth May seeming to say Canadians are «stupid» popped up on the web, The Hook broke the story that the Greens were calling the tape a fake and threatening to sue a blogger and others over it.
The other worry in these stories seems to be that these investors are somehow doing the wrong thing, straying outside of their proper category, by investing in private rather than public companies.
The story seems to make much of the fact that Peltz is a «hands - on» investor, so if something is prompting him to be liquidating $ 63 million of Heinz stock, then maybe other shareholders should be concerned.
Authorship of John — many if not most NT scholars believe that John nor one of 12 wrote John; James — most agree not authored by James, and sometime in 2nd century AD; Peter — a mystery — some think that it could have been an early template for the other gospels; Luke — a mystery; Mark — finally it seems like we really might have another original author here — or were he and later Paul just using a very early Peter story?
I think I'm too simple in my thinking that; if you don't like it, DO N'T WATCH... if you don't agree with it, DO N'T CHOOSE TO LIVE YOUR LIFE THAT WAY... Seems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i sSeems like a very simplistic way of thinking, but I have personal opinions on EVERYTHING, but I don't force others to live their lives according to my moral fiber... i don't judge people for living their lives the way that makes them happy... And i believe that IGNORANCE is the basis for INTOLERANCE... people are famous for HATING things that they don't understand... again, if it MORALLY offends you, don't read stories on things that you don't agree with, don't watch shows that portray choices that you don't agree with... The Brown family seems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i sseems close knit, almost like extended family living under one roof... the kids work together and get along much better than a lot of «mainstream» households i see...
And we have all watched you boldly take the way of abundance — no matter how it seemed like it didn't matter — because God makes meaning out of messes, because He is the God who can make all our brokenness into abundance, because, you and I say this back to each other over and over again: The Writer of the story has written Himself into the hardest places of yours and is softening the broken edges of everything with redeeming, abundant grace.»
On the other hand, I must admit that among young adults (myself included), there seems to be an unhealthy appetite for stories about the church that are exclusively negative.
I believe in the power of the blood of Jesus but now this leaves me afraid to admit it, for I'm already pegged as superstitious and into magic — seems no different than the boogyman stories my once conservative church tried to lay on me, that my protection is in their oversight, that if I leave them my life would be destroyed, and more — we must be careful in our ernest seeking after truth that we don't become what we have despised and that we don't put on others our perspectives and understandings.
I think maybe that's why sharing our stories with each other can be a powerful thing because something revelatory or influential can come from so far out of our normal sphere that it might seem like destiny or fate.
Stories that define a community different from the world around us because of the way these stories shape our self - understanding, a community that may sometimes be wildly radical politically and on other issues seem conservative, but will not let anyone else's vision set its Stories that define a community different from the world around us because of the way these stories shape our self - understanding, a community that may sometimes be wildly radical politically and on other issues seem conservative, but will not let anyone else's vision set its stories shape our self - understanding, a community that may sometimes be wildly radical politically and on other issues seem conservative, but will not let anyone else's vision set its agenda.
It's pretty simple stories that seemed to perpetuate over time without any truth other than what we invent.
It seems like no matter where you turn these days, you run into countless stories of injustice, suffering, pain, war, famine and other atrocities that seem to be plaguing our world.
Even when, like the characters in The Story of the Night, they seem to have fallen away from treating themselves, or their fellow human beings, with the appropriate respect, Jews and others in today's counterculture committed to the mystery of human responsibility before God, and charged with the task of pursuing our own unique individual and communal destiny in a conformist, uncomprehending world, need such reminders.
You seem to have highlighted particular sins as though some are worse than others all sin leads to death not just the big ones because we all are sinners.All have gone astray none are righteous.I believe the worst sin is pride idolatry is the first commandment we set ourselves as Gods.Regardless of what the sin is, our hearts are condemned by our pride.It wasnt the sin of homosexuality or sexual deviance that destroyed sodom.It was there pride and it is one of our biggest stumbling blocks in our christian walk or it certainly was for me.We look at the story of the adulterous woman and we think adultery is a terrible crime but the story is for our benefit to show that we all are sinners that Jesus does nt condemn us but came to save us.And when Jesus says go and sin no more he was not only talking to the woman but everyone else that was around judging her for her sin its a universal message that we all need to see that we all are condemned because of our sin that Jesus came to save us and that we turn from our sin and follow him.Because he is the way the truth and the life.brentnz
If Jesus was not allegedly crucified then there could be no story of death and rebirth, a theme which seems to have been copied from several other ancient religions that preceded Christianity.
The executive order seemed especially peculiar when juxtaposed with other stories on nature's inherent «unfairness,» such as a winter of record snowfall and the January earthquake in Los Angeles.
But none of this has stopped crusading «Christian» nations down to the present from using the Joshua stories and other support they seem to find in the Bible for an unending stream of war and slaughter.
On the other hand, I was surprised at his seeming criticism of the Babar stories, whose merit he saw as lying chiefly in the illustrations.
The details of this story, on the other hand, seem incredible to modern man.
Not proven beyond a doubt but by referencing various written works by many of his «disciples» and others (monks etc) over 600 years AD who all had the exact same story though threatened with death etc it seems HE did live.
I'm genuinely curious because I don't like the command to kill passages in the OT, but can't seem to make sense of the story any other way without doing some serious mental gymnastics.
These stories and others like them seem to indicate that a new and different type of political conflict has swept the nation.
Adherents of the new Christian sects, of which there were many competing ones, e.g., Ebonites, Gnostics, etc., would have been familiar with the Serapis and likely would not have wanted their godman to seem any less impressive than the gods of the Serapis and other religions of the time, so there would have been a need for a miraculous birth story and other miracle stories for their godman, as well.
The threefold division into body, soul, and spirit, apparent in the New Testament, seems to carry back into the Old as well, for one can easily assume that it is met with in the creation stories, to speak of no other.
For this as well as for other reasons C. F. Evans is justified in saying that John's version «would seem to represent an end - product of the development of the story of the empty tomb».32
It seemed that too many of the archaeological arguments advanced in support of the Bible story were convincing only to those who wanted to be convinced, and the «archaeological solutions» to problematic historical questions tended to sidetrack the search for other possible solutions.
There were other issues too: The way the accounts of Israel's monarchy contradicted one another, the way Jesus and Paul quoted Hebrew Scripture in ways that seemed to stretch the original meaning, the fact that women were considered property in Levitical Law, the way both science and archeology challenged the historicity of so many biblical texts, and the fact that it was nearly impossible for me to write a creative retelling of Resurrection Day because each of the gospel writers tell the story so differently, sometimes with contradictory details.
The similarity in style and content between the stories I knew from the Bible and the myths of other Mesopotamian cultures suddenly made those strange tales of talking snakes and forbidden fruit and boats packed with animals seem colloquial, routine — nothing more than myths operating from the religious and literary conventions of the day.
The second story seems to have the Hindus up in arms against the book, looks like they (hindus) somehow feel that they have a free pass at criticizing others here but when it comes to their own are very closed minded and fanatic.
The nice part of this story is that man and monk have had a wonderful opportunity to relax, get to know each other, develop some pleasant memories from what seems to be a joyous heart to heart connect!
You seem to solely exist in the realm of quotes, opinions of others, stories handed down to you by those who traveled the road before.
This general similarity between the two stories does not necessarily mean that one story was derived from the other, although it seems likely that both written accounts originated in the tenth century.
If your stories, overtime, seem useful to others in particular circumstances, tell them, but don't allow your practice to dominate ordinary situations and everyday activities.
There were numerous times where fight scenes were completely unnecessary, and other times where the fight scenes seems to drag on and on, but then, they delete entire portions out of the Bible (such as all of Jacob's story, the 40 years of wilderness wanderings, etc.) Couldn't they have cut out the fight scenes and included a scene or two from these other crucial events?
It seems like Pixar has a saner and healthier viewpoint than other animators, and they turn out better stories all around (though Cars was a bit of a disappointment in that regard ¯ only in comparison to the terrific earlier stuff, that is).
The whole Christmas story, mingled as it is now with Santa Claus and other more or less pagan additions, seems much like a fairy tale for children.
Try expanding your narrow views to the other religious tomes that exist in our world, you seem to be hung up on the jesus story.
Sometimes, everything about a blog post other than the actual recipe and instructions seems kinda like having to sit through some big distraction, when all you really want to hear are some circus stories.
Both stories seem plausible and there are probably many others, so I guess we have to be content just with the fact that at least someone in America invented them.
We don't seem to hear these stories at R. M. Barca and other big European teams.
fact; if wenger was a manager in any other country hed have been replaced for his own safety.maybe the fans are part of the problem too, the journalsts seem to be under his spell too comparinf the level of hostility jose and lvg have endured.well thats the curious story of wenger and the brits who couldnt do s **** about him.i bet after a loss he reminds himself «i am arsenal nobody can do s **** about me, its never that serious!!»
Many other stories have gone on and on through the transfer period, including for example Coquelin's transfer to Valencia — and of course it might still happen, but it seems unlikely.
There have been rumours of a clash between Karanka and David Nugent but more reliable stories seem to point to his concerns over other players and their performances, notably Stewart Downing.
Having said that, the Sun «s article may just be a total transfer fart as it seems they don't have any credible source to back up their story other than the fact that Hazard could be leaving and Oxlade - Chamberlain is more often than not, on the Arsenal bench.
The more you hear the stories of hope from others who have been through the tough journey, the more it seems to help to get through it yourself.
Completion of chores can unlock other privileges (e.g., a special snack, story, or game) or one thing we've done with Laurel is offer a small payment if she wants to do a task that seems out of the ordinary.
But it seems like every other day there's another story about a heroic single father who's somehow raising his kids on his own.
You're not as bad as some others here... but there seems to be some kind of subtext going on here where people are trying to «guess» my story... tell me about myself and what I believe... or the worst... talk about me as if I'm not here reading the comments.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z