Others accept the science of vaccination, but fail to get the full course or get them on time.
Not exact matches
Rather than
accepting the
science and adapting to
other sources of energy, the oil industry has developed an aggressive campaign to obscure the
science and advance its own interests.
In
other words, he is willing to
accept science when believing otherwise would bring him direct physical harm, he is willing to «believe» whatever it takes so he can get
other folks to help him create a J - O - B and a salary from his «Creation Museum».
The
Science behind the big bang has some gapping holes yet its put forward all the time to the public as the only other option is..., as well as Macro evolution but well we all know that they say its the only option... Could it be that science doesn't accept a concept of God from the outset so then the big bang and evolution are the only o
Science behind the big bang has some gapping holes yet its put forward all the time to the public as the only
other option is..., as well as Macro evolution but well we all know that they say its the only option... Could it be that
science doesn't accept a concept of God from the outset so then the big bang and evolution are the only o
science doesn't
accept a concept of God from the outset so then the big bang and evolution are the only options.
The textbooks in Texas (which drives many
other states» printings) does have alternative theories to
accepted science.
Peer review in climate
science means that the «team» recommends publication of each
other's work, and tries to keep any off - message paper from being
accepted for publication.
Furthermore, they seem happy to
accept one unanswered question in return for being able to use God to answer any number of
other questions, at least until better answers can be found through
science and reason.
A student with basic training in the
sciences knows not to
accept something like the «big bang theory», or
other science lore.
You likely deny evolution and global warming for no
other reason than it makes you uncomfortable and hold
science to the impossibly high standard of having to explain every conceivable mystery about the natural World before you will
accept it, but some moron at a pulpit doing magic hand signals of a Sundaymorning is enough to convince you he is communicating with some sky - god and turning grocery store bread and wine into flesh and blood.
We clearly need to follow his lead in crossing disciplinary boundaries, challenging uncritically
accepted paradigms in
science and education, getting
others to join us in the complex task of trying to determine how things really are.
In
other words, no, the modern militant atheist zealots are NOT willing to
accept the fact that some people believe in God and
science.
Its imperative comprehends all the
sciences and on - campus movements, and it demands that all
other agendas
accept its authority.
On the
other side are «creationists,» who argue — against not only
science but also those faiths that
accept the compatibility of evolutionary biology and Sacred Writ — that the earth was created on or around Sunday, October 23, 4004 b.c., a conclusion based on a sincere but discredited calculation by James Ussher in the seventeenth century.
If I
accepted the present goal of the
science of economics, I might still complain that it would be good to think about it, but I would probably be talking with you about some
other topic.
Is it possible and after reading about it i kept on thinking «i will sell to my soul for 20 carats get out shut up i will never ever sell my soul to you oh god please help me and this is continuing for a few days i am afraid that i have sold my sold to the devil have i please help and still i think god's way of allowing
others to hate him us much worse even you know and can easily think think about much better punishments like rebirth after being punished for all the sins in life and i am feeling put on the sin of those who committed the unforgiviable sin (the early 0th century priests) imagine them burning in hell fire till now for 2000 years hopelessly screaming to god for help i can't belive the mercy of god are they forgiven even though commiting this sin keans going to hell for entinity thank you and congralutions i think the 7 year tribulation periodvis over in 18th century the great commect shooting and in 19th century the sun became dark for a day and moon was not visible on the earth but now satun has the domination over me those who don't belive in jesus crist i used to belive in him but now after knowing a lot in
science it is getting harharder to belive in him even though i know that he exsists and i only belived in him not that he died for me in the cross and also not for eternal life and i still sin as much as i used to before but only a little reduced and i didn't
accept satan as my master but what can i do because those who knowingly sin a lot and don't belive in jesus christ has to
accept satan as their master because he only teaches us that even though he is evil he gives us complete freedom but thr followers of jesus and god only have freedom because they can sin only with in a limit and no more but recive their reward after their life in heaven but the followers of satun have to go to hell butbi don't want to go to hell and be ruled by the cruel tryant but still why didn't god destroy satun long way before and i think it was also Adam and eve's fault also they could have blamed satan and could have also get their punishment reduced but they didn't and today we are seeing the result
The basic insight of the sociology of knowledge (my particular gate into the social
sciences) is that, with the exception of an acute toothache, which can be experienced without support from
others, we
accept the reality that is taken as such by those around us.
Let it first be said that Christian
Science accepts the Protestant Christian Bible, just as
other Protestant Christians do.
Let us suppose that two men have an eye disease, and one of them submits to the cure and takes whatever medical
science advises, even if it is disagreeable, while the
other not only does not
accept any advice from the doctor, but also lives intemperately.
You likely deny global warming for no
other reason than it makes you uncomfortable and hold
science to the impossibly high standard of having to explain every conceivable mystery about the natural World before you will
accept it, but some moron rolling around a floor speaking in tongues is enough to convince you he is channeling a spirit.
(ii) you, JW, have a startling new piece of evidence that was right before our eyes that will turn
accepted biological
science and about 10
other sciences on their heads if ONLY people would listen to you, no doubt earning you a Nobel Prize and a place in history beside the likes of Darwin, Newton and Einstein; or
Wouldn't you be angry too if you recognized that the predominant religion in your country was nothing but a Bronze Age fairy tale but it was so widely
accepted that it intruded into your country's politics, laws, educational system, medical
science, and nearly every
other aspect?
My purpose, and I presume that of all
others who have approached the subject from the scientific side, has been to find a metaphysics which, with the minimum of speculation, finds a place for the obviously primary reality of the stream of consciousness, while fully
accepting the findings of
science.
«To suggest we can't know how old the Earth is, then, is to deny the validity of these scientific methods altogether» - No it's to be open minded to the idea that we might be wrong, on the
other hand to
accept these dates without question or reservation is to
accept current
science without question.
Other components of the program are educational and research opportunities, mentoring, a
science - writing workshop, career counseling and guidance, and financial support for students
accepted into a graduate - level program.
«I was pleasantly surprised by the fact that there were unanimous decisions about most issues, and strong consensus on the
others,» says Ron Fouchier, a flu virologist at Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, whose study has been
accepted by the journal
Science.
First Release provides rapid online publication of selected research papers, Perspectives, and
other articles that have recently been
accepted for publication in
Science.
Yet, he indicated that the party is willing to
accept them, even as
other Republicans openly reject the
science behind the greenhouse effect.
As the first of several national laboratories that China intends to launch in the coming years —
others will be devoted to brain research, physics, and environmental
science — the Qingdao lab will also be a bellwether for efforts to persuade scientists to
accept greater government scrutiny and direction in exchange for ample resources.
The papers, one with lead author Katherine de Kleer, a UC Berkeley graduate student, and coauthored by UC Berkeley research astronomer Máté Ádámkovics, and the
other coauthored by Ádámkovics and David R. Ciardi of Caltech's NASA Exoplanet
Science Institute, have been
accepted for publication in the journal Icarus.
The Royal Society will still
accept applications in all fields of the natural
sciences (including
other biological) as long as the project is not addressing a direct biomedical question.
With the subject matter rotating each year among astrophysics, nanoscience and neuroscience, reporters
accepted in the competitive program are provided a unique opportunity to learn in - depth about the
science and issues in these fields from researchers based at the university and
other institutions, including the Kavli Institutes.
But he points out a critical limitation of these findings that
others disregard, including Evertson, Hawley, and Zlotnik: the teachers in the study were an elite group of
science teachers who had been accepted by the National Science Foundation Summer Ins
science teachers who had been
accepted by the National
Science Foundation Summer Ins
Science Foundation Summer Institute.
A critical element of that contract was establishing SPR's ownership rights to the journal (Prevention
Science), something that most
other publishers would not
accept.
Strong technical skills, particularly in integrating technology in the classroom to drive academic achievement Demonstrated volunteer or community service At least one (or more) of the following: o National Board Certificationo TAP Experience (sign on bonus for TAP certification) o Core Knowledge Experienceo Experience with Blended Learningo At least two years of successful teaching in an urban environment ESSENTIAL POSITION FUNCTIONS: An Elementary School teacher is required to perform the following duties: Plan and implement a blended learning environment, providing direct and indirect instruction in the areas of Social Studies,
Science, Language Arts, Health, and Mathematics based on state standards Participation in all TAP requirements, focusing on data - driven instruction Create inviting, innovative and engaging learning environment that develops student critical thinking and problem solving skills Prepare students for strong academic achievement and passing of all required assessments Communicate regularly with parents Continually assess student progress toward mastery of standards and keep students and parents well informed of student progress by collecting and tracking data, providing daily feedback, weekly assessments, and occasional parent / teacher conferences Work with the Special Education teachers and administration to serve special needs students in the classroom Attend all grade level and staff meetings and attend designated school functions outside of school hours Establish and enforce rules for behavior and procedures for maintaining order among the students for whom you are responsible
Accept and incorporate feedback and coaching from administrative staff Perform necessary duties including but not limited to morning, lunch, dismissal, and after - school duties Preforms
other duties, as deemed appropriate, by the principal Dress professionally and uphold all school policies
These standards for the resulting American Humane Certified program were built upon the internationally
accepted values of the Five Freedoms, adopted by the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, as well as input from animal
science experts, veterinarians and
other animal husbandry specialists.
Climate change denialism is somewhat understandable in this regard —
accepting climate
science means coming face - to - face with the realization that one is contributing to serious harms to
others, including one's own progeny.
This tribal theory applies to peoples political affiliations such as liberal or conservative, or membership of
other social groups, and we know liberals do tend to
accept climate
science more than conservatives from polls by Pew Research etc, although its not black and white.
The
science rejects the deniers submitted papers on their take on the subject from denying that the temperatures have risen at all to
other explanations for the recorded (and
accepted) warming from to its the Sun (totally wrong) to Galactic Cosmic Rays.
News articles by The Times, Time, the Associated Press and
others capture the basics in two new papers, one on six West Antarctic glaciers that appear to have nothing holding back eventual disappearance,
accepted for publication in Geophysical Research Letters, and the
other taking a closer look at one of those ice masses, the Thwaites Glacier, posted online today by the journal
Science.
The simple fact is that people must
accept the
science if for no
other reason that the truth matters — both for practical considerations such as policy and for its own sake.
• Pres ointroduces the paper ooutlines the content • - massive clapping by Venezuela on the table, but are not given the right to speak • Tuvalu oI am grateful that you came back to the meeting owithin the UN, we are given respect as nations owe have processes to consider items collectively otoday I saw leaders saying they had a deal othis is disrespectful of the
other countries owe have democratic processes owe appreciate that you have given us more time othis documents have major problems owe need
science - based results oanything above 1,5 can mean the end for oresponse measures — inconsistant with Bali oreference to mechanism on REDD - but is not defined clearly ono reference to International Insurance Mechanism oreview mechanism in 2015 is too late oin biblical terms: oI regret to inform you: Tuvalu can not
accept that document • Venezuela (bleeding hands from her clapping!)
Indeed, throughout the
Science Bulletin paper on Why models run hot, it is self - evident not only that I and my co-authors, including Dr Soon,
accept that our returning some CO2 to the atmosphere from which it originally came will cause some global warming, but also that we are thoroughly familiar with the scientific reasons why — all
other things being equal — more CO2 in the atmosphere will cause some warming.
In
other words, skeptics can theoretically doubt the
science of C02, however if they wanted to build a working thing they would have to
accept it.
These allegations were reported gleefully in the Boston Globe, the New York Times, the Washington Post, Nature, Scientific American, and many
other media outlets and news pages of
science journals in a manner calculated not only to divert attention from the conclusions of our paper but also to damage Dr Soon's reputation in his scientific calling, to put his employment at the Center at risk, to deter more serious journals from
accepting future papers bearing his name as an author, to deter potential funders for fear of adverse publicity, and thus to threaten not only his livelihood but also the
science he loves.
We have to establish the correct
science, and convince as many as we can of our fellow scientists, who indifferently
accept the AGW arguments, trusting on the scientific integrity of scientists of
other fields.
It comes at a time when President Donald Trump and
other members of the administration have expressed doubt about the
accepted science of climate change, and are considering drastic cuts to federal funding for scientific research.
Other research has shown that if people are told about the expert consensus, they're also more likely to
accept the
science.
What you
accept as hard
science,
others reject as unproven theories.
Others have suggested that such homeostatic phenomena require the investigator to
accept the claim that climate
science is chaotic or something like chaotic.
Other skeptics have looked at the same
science and same data, and decided that for them, there is still not enough there to
accept AGW as provisionally true.