Owners are responsible for the actions of hunting dogs and other animals at large, and for any damage done by them.
What this means is that dog
owners are responsible for the actions of their pets, no ifs or buts.
A pet
owner is responsible for the actions of their pet, including if it should attack and harm another individual.
Dog Bite Accident — Dog
owners are responsible for the actions of their pets.
Not exact matches
Lenders don't want to
be held
responsible for deficiencies in the properties they
're selling, or
for the
actions of financially distressed
owners, who have
been known to strip their houses bare — even removing toilets — before handing over the keys.
But SURPRISE — thanks to Governor Dannel Malloy's recent
action, Achievement First, Inc. and Connecticut's Charter School
owners, operators and advocates
are celebrating the fact that one of their own has quietly
been appointed to Connecticut's State Board of Education, the very state entity that remains
responsible for overseeing and regulating charter schools.
«Therefore, as an
owner, you
are responsible for what your dog does and have a duty to take reasonable
actions to prevent injury, not just bites,» he adds.
Owners are responsible and liable
for the
actions and behavior of their dogs at all times.
Pet
owners are solely
responsible and liable
for any and all
actions of their pet during the stay at Dog & Pooch, including, and not limited to, injury to another pet, a D&P staff member, or a member of the public.
Each
owner or handler
is legally and financially
responsible for the
actions of their dog in the off - leash exercise area.
The
owner would
responsible for any additional costs, including medications, which will
be discussed before any
action is discussed.
GDRNC
is not
responsible for an incident that occurs with these dogs due to any
action by a new
owner.
We also need more education on: • The importance and necessity of spaying and neutering, so we can end pet overpopulation • Ending puppy mills once and
for all, so we can end the senseless suffering of mama dogs whose feet often times never touch the ground • The importance of micro-chipping, so beloved pets can return home • The importance of vaccinations, so we can eradicate diseases like parvo that leave innocent puppies suffering • Updating our licensing laws so that pet «
owners»
are held
responsible for their animal's
actions, not the animal.
As policy, it causes
responsible dog
owners and their dogs to
be held accountable
for the
actions of the irresponsible.
It also protects
owners whose dogs have
been accused but not convicted of bad behavior and holds
owners responsible for the
actions of their pets if an allegation
is proven.
In all honesty, castrating a dog
is the most
responsible action a dog
owner can take, regardless of whether their new pup
is just a tyke or he has
been wandering around this world
for the last ten years completely intact.
The real answer
is to hold an
owner responsible for his or her pet's
actions.
Owners should
be held
responsible for their
actions not the dog!!!! End PitBull discrimination!!!!!
Another poll question indicated that
owners were responsible for dog bites and attacks; less than 20 % felt the breeder
was responsible for the dog's
actions.
If treatment
is recommended
for a condition or illness, the
owner would
be responsible for any additional costs, including medications, which will
be discussed before any
action is taken.
If a property
owner is not held
responsible for their unsafe
actions, there
is no motivation there to make changes that prevent future accidents.
Shareholders (i.e.,
owners) have limited liability
for the debts of the corporation, but officers can
be held
responsible for their own
actions.
If you
are hurt in an elevator, conveyor or escalator accident due to the negligent
actions of a manufacturer or property
owner, we can help you hold them
responsible for your medical bills, lost income, and future expenses
for a potentially permanent physical disability as well as
for emotional trauma and pain and suffering.
General partners:
Owners of a partnership who
are responsible for the management of the partnership, receive a share of the partnership's profits and losses, and who
are personally liable
for the
actions of the other partners and the debts of the business.
In cases of an animal or dog bite, the
owner of the dog
is fully
responsible by default
for the dog's
actions, and if they
are a homeowner, compensation will most likely
be paid out of their insurance after a personal injury claim.
In other words, the dog
owner is considered to
be legally
responsible for the
actions of the animal, regardless of whether or not he or she
is found to have
been negligent in allowing the attack to occur.
Bus Companies: Bus company
owners and employers may
be held
responsible for the
actions of their bus drivers.
Pursuant to Ontario legislation, dog
owners are responsible for their pet's
actions and as such owe a duty to others.
[3] If someone else, other than the
owner or the victim,
is found to
be responsible for the dog's
actions, the
owner remains liable to pay damages to the victim, however the
owner is entitled to recover some or all of the damages from that other person depending to the extent that the other person caused or contributed to the damages.
Dog
owners are held
responsible for the
action of their pet.
This means that, with a few exceptions, all
owners are responsible for their dog's
actions.
Simply put, the appeal adjudicator and Board found that the law
is the law, and that «unfairness» of holding the corporate directors
responsible for outstanding wages given the
owner's
actions could not factor into the decision.
Homeowners
are responsible for the
actions of their pets; some companies will not provide coverage to
owners of high risk «bully breeds» such as pit bulls
A person designated by a school
owner to
be responsible for all
actions related to day - to - day operation and administration of the school.
In no way
are the
owners of, or contributors to, the Website
responsible for the
actions, decisions, or other behavior taken or not taken by you in reliance upon the Website.
The
Owner alleged that Fannie Mae had essentially become the employer of the individuals who threw out her possessions because of the extensive control it exercised over the contractors and so
was responsible for their
actions.