Sentences with phrase «ownership of copyright does»

Ownership of copyright does not, however, flow from the provincial land registration scheme.

Not exact matches

With regards to copyright ownership and / or restrictions of many great Australian TV shows, why is it that some show's pass these restrictions and get a re - run on free to air or Fox while many others do not.

We do not take ownership of any of the pictures on our site and they're copyrighted to their respectfull owners.

While many traditional - publishing contracts these days contain «life of copyright» clauses, those don't transfer ownership of the copyright — the publisher does not own one's work.

On this page you identify yourself as the author and claim copyright ownership of your book (if you're not the original author, or you're not the exclusive publisher or distributor of this book, your book does not belong on Smashwords.

Their approval doesn't give you ownership of the copyright, but it does grant you permission to use that specific work in a limited way.

In open access publishing, materials are published under a Creative Commons or other non-restrictive licence: authors retain ownership of the copyright to their content, but allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute or copy the content as long as the original author and source are credited and there is no commercial purpose to the reuse, and no permission is required from the author or the publisher to do so.

That is, if copyright exists, then you don't get it and neither do they claim ownership of it: it stays with whoever owns the copyright.

licencing (which isn't really ownership, but does give some rights to a party who would otherwise not have them, including, in the case of exclusive licencing, the right to invoke the act for copyright infringement).

This alignment of copyright ownership and private contracting has allowed record companies to make lucrative deals for themselves that they do not share with the artists.

The executive branch in each Canadian jurisdiction (provinces, territories, federal) is free to enact its own copyright and licensing policy in relation to the work product of its public servants, and so does in a variety of ways, some more permissive than others (see Noel Cox, «Copyright in Statutes, Regulations, and Judicial Decisions in Common Law Jurisdictions: Public Ownership or Commercial Enterpriscopyright and licensing policy in relation to the work product of its public servants, and so does in a variety of ways, some more permissive than others (see Noel Cox, «Copyright in Statutes, Regulations, and Judicial Decisions in Common Law Jurisdictions: Public Ownership or Commercial EnterprisCopyright in Statutes, Regulations, and Judicial Decisions in Common Law Jurisdictions: Public Ownership or Commercial Enterprise?»

The copyright in such work is independent of, and does not affect or enlarge the scope, duration, ownership, or subsistence of, any copyright protection in the preexisting material.

The US Copyright Office interprets that as meaning that authors have equal rights to the work (an undivided ownership share): in other words, any author can grant permission to publish, and a copyright license of transfer of rights does not have to be agreed on by bothCopyright Office interprets that as meaning that authors have equal rights to the work (an undivided ownership share): in other words, any author can grant permission to publish, and a copyright license of transfer of rights does not have to be agreed on by bothcopyright license of transfer of rights does not have to be agreed on by both authors.

I doubt they would attempt to assert copyright ownership over the original pleading itself and do recognize that they may have an independent claim of copyright in the database that they've compiled (and any other related summaries, keywords, indexing, etc. that they've added) to the extent that the criteria in CCH v. LSUC is met.

We have electronic publishing totally tied up by lawyers before the products even hit the ground on the one hand, and on the other, the internet generation who really do not care about copyright restrictions and the implications down the track of not protecting the author's rights of ownership.

I don't want to claim the ownership of the copyright or want to change the the license.

The Office does not verify ownership or examine the work, nor is it able to offer advice on particular works as copyright subject matter, scope of protection, or matters of infringement.

If it were transferred, e.g., in a will, does the original length of the copyright still apply, just that the ownership would be to the new owners?

The United States does not claim copyright or any intellectual ownership of any of its productions.

There's just one problem: you may have privacy laws protecting you from being spied on and copyright laws protecting ownership of content you create, but data doesn't belong to you just because it's about you.

By purchasing the Resume Design you do not obtain ownership, copyright or exclusive usage of the Product and this Resume Design will be available for purchase to other customers.

«And your proof of ownership can be the artist's rights and your bill of sale, or a declaration from the artist that the rights or copyrights to the work they did for you were transferred to you.»