Sentences with phrase «p value =»

Moreover, using a Bayesian deconvolution method to estimate methylation levels from the data [53], we found promoter methylation levels to be significantly inversely correlated (p value = 2.3e - 25) with previously published gene expression levels of T cells from human samples (Figure S1).

The association between postnatal depression and child behavioural problems was significantly mediated by the stunted growth of the child (β = 0.294, p value = 0.111).

Results Maternal postnatal depression was significantly associated with child behaviour problems at age 2, independent of socioeconomic status (β = 0.353, p value = 0.015).

The difference between 20 % and 43 % is a statistically significant difference (p value = 0.002).

In addition, the difference between $ 6,593 and $ 23,022 is statistically significant (p value = 0.004).

However, RIPK2 inhibitor 1 was as efficacious as ponatinib at 100 nM for NFκB inhibition (P value = 0.06 when comparing RIPK2 inhibitor 1 vs. ponatinib inhibition of MDP - driven NFκB activation).

Not exact matches

HSTC streams also had significantly (p = 0.05) lower conductivity values during the transition period, although this trend was weaker through the year.

When studies were stratified by mean age, studies with a lower mean age (≤ 55 y) suggested a borderline inverse association (RR: 0.94; 95 % CI: 0.89, 1.01), with the I2 value decreasing from 72 % to 38 % (P = 0.2).

I ran a p - value on the comparison and it's not statistically different (p = 0.27 for one tailed test).

There was no difference in the number of women who were undelivered at 48 hours with resolution of vaginal bleeding and contractions in the magnesium sulfate (80.0 %) and saline (66.7 %; p - value = 0.68) groups.

In B, the P and Q values are as follows: exclusively breasfed vs combination fed (P =.02; Q =.04), combination fed vs exclusively formula fed (P =.52; Q =.52), and exclusively breastfed vs exclusively formula fed (P =.04; Q =.04).

When we decreased the threshold of significance to uncorrected P < 0.05, SPM showed lower values in marijuana abusers than in controls in ventral striatum (0, − 2, − 8; statistical t values = 2.59, P uncorrected = 0.007).

Shown are correlation coefficient values of those voxels that had a significant negative association between IQ and normalized path length for T = 0.45 (linear regression, p < 0.05 uncorrected for multiple comparisons, df = 18, corrected for age).

The values show mild statistically significant difference in number of progeny laid by mutant worms CK123 compared to wild type N2 animals during the day 3 (Two Tailed T Test, p = 0.04962).

Urinary BPA concentrations in 2005/06 (geometric mean 1.79 ng / ml, 95 % CI: 1.64 to 1.96) were lower than in 2003/04 (2.49 ng / ml, CI: 2.20 to 2.83, difference p - value = 0.00002).

Results with a p - value = 0.05 — 0.1 are coloured dark orange (increase) and blue (decrease); a p - value = 0.1 — 0.34 are coloured light orange (increase) and light blue (decrease); a p - value > = 0.34 is coloured green.

The comparison between all participants at baseline and post-intervention follow - up (presumably reflecting changes driven by a relaxation or effect unrelated to meditation) resulted in a signature comprising 390 genes (P - value threshold = 7.9 e − 4).

In contrast, the mean RND value was significantly lower for the X-chromosome (RND = 0.176) when compared to the autosomes (RND = 0.209; P < 0.001).

Additionally, the average FST values among SNPs contained within 100 kb non-overlapping windows derived independently from each datasets were highly significantly correlated (R = 0.5; P < 1.0 × 10 − 16; data not shown).

The subjective ratings of the anxiety and sport odor were not significantly different [intensity: F (1, 26) = 0.08, pleasantness: F (1, 26 = 0.25, unpleasantness: F (1, 26) = 0.07, familiarity: F (1, 26) = 0.42; all p - values > 0.50].

The p.S284X variant in ANGPTL6 drives the association signal (rs201622589, MAF ~ 0.1 %, odds ratio = 10.13, p - value = 0.042) and results in complete loss of secretion in cells.

Similarly, the Permanova analysis resulted in a Pseudo-F value of 1.98 (p = 0.001).

The SpatialDE test fits the \ (\ sigma ^ 2 \) and \ (\ delta \) parameters to each genes observed expression levels, and also compares the likelihood with a model that has no spatial variance (FSV = 0) to obtain a significance level (p - value).

FMc concentrations were significantly higher in the controls than in the women with history of breast cancer (p = 0.01) in a model of the ranked values adjusted for age, number of children, birth of a son, history of miscarriage, oral contraceptive use, and total number of genomes tested.

All P values were two - tailed (α = 0.05).

Food elimination based on IgG antibodies in irritable bowel syndrome: a randomised controlled trial http://gut.bmj.com/content/53/10/1459.short «After 12 weeks, the true diet resulted in a 10 % greater reduction in symptom score than the sham diet (mean difference 39 (95 % confidence intervals (CI) 5 — 72); p = 0.024) with this value increasing to 26 % in fully compliant patients (difference 98 (95 % CI 52 — 144); p < 0.001).»

Daily plasma glucose concentrations were 10 percent lower with the high - fiber diet than with the ADA diet (values for the area under the curve, 3743 ± 944 vs. 3365 ± 1003 mg ․ hour per deciliter [207.8 ± 52.4 vs. 186.8 ± 55.7 mmol ․ hour per liter]; P = 0.02), and plasma insulin concentrations were 12 percent lower (values for the area under the curve, 1107 ± 650 vs. 971 ± 491 μU ․ hour per milliliter [6642 ± 3900 vs. 5826 ± 2946 pmol ․ hour per liter]; P = 0.05)(Figure 1).

P values are calculated by mixed model ANOVAs for main effect of condition (n = 16).

Glycosylated hemoglobin values were slightly lower after the high - fiber diet (P = 0.09).

The control groups mean hip extension values never differed more than s = 1.65 ° across all session (p > 0.05).

Because the observed association between percentage of calories from added sugar and CVD mortality appeared to be nonlinear (P <.05 for linearity), we used the Box - Cox transformation, with λ = 2.5 when estimating the usual percentage of calories from added sugar using the NCI method.35 To present the results, we calculated the 10th, 30th, 50th, 70th, and 90th percentiles» distribution of the estimated added sugar intake as the middle value of each quintile.

a, b: Because N × P was significant (case of liver), means were then compared using an unpaired Student's t test; values are means ± sem, n = 16; values with the same letter are not different, P ≤ 0.05.

Values are mean ± SEM, latencies from low group differ from those of adequate (P = 0.054) and high (P < 0.05) groups.

Market cap is speculative value, M = P * W, where W is stock (or other way of owning) percentage of ownership, P - price of percentage of ownership.

The fair value line, now in blue, is drawn at P / E = 20.4.

It is drawn at a value of P / E = 13.8, because that is Merck's 5 - year average historical valuation.

Assuming that today's dividend yield is 2 %, P / E10 = 10 (versus today's value of 27) increases the dividend yield to 5.4 %.

The scaling formula is very simple: S&P 500 value = (P / E10 value) * -LSB-(S&P 500 reference) / -LRB-[P / E10 reference]-RRB-.

If you check the Stock Returns Predictor, you will find that the Most Likely return at Year 10 is close to minus (1 %) when starting from P / E10 = 44, the value in January 2000.

When P / E10 = 14, which is a typical value historically, you can not own enough stocks.

P / E10 = 15 When I enter P / E10 = 15 and a TIPS interest rate of 2.0 % or less and a Terminal Value percentage from 0 % to 100 %, all optimal fixed stock allocations equal 80 %.

Supposedly the shares are correctly valued when PEG = 1, or when the P / E equals the growth rate.

V * = Intrinsic value EPS = Trailing twelve months earnings / share 8.5 = P / E base for a no - growth company g = Expected long term earnings growth rate 4.4 = Average yield of high - grade corporate bonds in 1962, when the formula was introduced Y = Current average yield on 20 year AAA corporate bonds

Formula: P / B Ratio = Stock Price / Book Value per Share Book Value per Share = (Total Stockholder's Equity — Preferred Equity) / Total Outstanding Shares

Here is the HSwOptT2 regression equation of 1923 - 1975 30 - Year Half Constant Terminal Value Rates HCTVR versus the percentage earnings yield 100E10 / P: y = 0.373 x +2.9701 plus and minus 0.8 %.

Here is the CLHOptB regression equation of 1923 - 1975 30 - Year Constant Terminal Value Rates versus the percentage earnings yield 100E10 / P: y = 0.5436 x +1.6339 plus 4.0 % and minus 2.0 %.

Here is the HLHOptF regression equation of 1923 - 1975 30 - Year Half Constant Terminal Value Rates versus the percentage earnings yield 100E10 / P: y = 0.4663 x +2.3191 plus 1.4 % and minus 0.8 %.

It is drawn at a value of P / E = 17.4, because that is Smucker's long - term average valuation going back before the Great Recession.

Here is the HLHOptC regression equation of 1923 - 1975 30 - Year Half Constant Terminal Value Rates versus the percentage earnings yield 100E10 / P: y = 0.5772 x +2.0241 plus 3.5 % and minus 1.4 %.

Here is the HLHOptA regression equation of 1923 - 1975 30 - Year Half Constant Terminal Value Rates versus the percentage earnings yield 100E10 / P: y = 0.5546 x +2.1411 plus 3.0 % and minus 1.2 %.