Sentences with phrase «p values per»

The average number of P values per paper has been steadily rising, they found.

Not exact matches

Add the fact that much of the earnings - per - share growth is created by making acquisitions of slower growing, lower P / E companies, and one might think that the new, larger level of earnings should be valued at a smaller multiple than the prior earnings were.

Price - to - book (P / B) ratio is another popular tool for measuring the price of a stock or index against its per - share book value (total assets minus intangible assets and liabilities).

From Investopedia, «The price - earnings ratio (P / E Ratio) is the ratio for valuing a company that measures its current share price relative to its per - share earnings.»

The investor looking only at P / E is effectively valuing these businesses at negative $ 136 per share ($ 4 of losses multiplied by the 34x P / E ratio).

To determine the companies» P / E ratios, we just need to divide the share price by the earnings - per - share value for each respective company.

The price - earnings ratio (P / E ratio) is the ratio for valuing a company that measures its current share price relative to its per - share earnings.

Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus), Fresh, raw pods, Nutrition value per 100 g. (Source: USDA National Nutrient data base) / p >

To examine the extent to which maternal fish intake modified relationships of breastfeeding with outcome measures, we stratified by fish intake (< 2 vs ≥ 2 servings per week) and calculated the P value for an interaction term (breastfeeding duration × fish intake) in linear regression.

Mean values that share same letters per bee species are not significantly different according to Tukey post-hoc tests at p < 0.05 following ANOVA (*** indicates p < 0.0001).

On Day 3, the percentage of time spent freezing during the two tones is averaged per group, and then groups can be compared and P - values calculated to determine statistical significance.

P values are from the multiple linear regression models for the relation between dietary magnesium intake (per 100 mg / d increase) and log - transformed biomarkers.

Daily plasma glucose concentrations were 10 percent lower with the high - fiber diet than with the ADA diet (values for the area under the curve, 3743 ± 944 vs. 3365 ± 1003 mg ․ hour per deciliter [207.8 ± 52.4 vs. 186.8 ± 55.7 mmol ․ hour per liter]; P = 0.02), and plasma insulin concentrations were 12 percent lower (values for the area under the curve, 1107 ± 650 vs. 971 ± 491 μU ․ hour per milliliter [6642 ± 3900 vs. 5826 ± 2946 pmol ․ hour per liter]; P = 0.05)(Figure 1).

As per the American Statistical Association's (ASA) recently released «Statement on P - Values,» statistical significance «is not equivalent to scientific, human, or economic significance... Any effect, no matter how tiny, can produce a small p - value [i.e., «statistical significance»] if the sample size or measurement precision is high enough» (p. 10); hence, one must always check for practical significance when making claims about statistical significance, like Kane et al. actually do here, but do here in a similar inflated veinP - Values,» statistical significance «is not equivalent to scientific, human, or economic significance... Any effect, no matter how tiny, can produce a small p - value [i.e., «statistical significance»] if the sample size or measurement precision is high enough» (p. 10); hence, one must always check for practical significance when making claims about statistical significance, like Kane et al. actually do here, but do here in a similar inflated veinp - value [i.e., «statistical significance»] if the sample size or measurement precision is high enough» (p. 10); hence, one must always check for practical significance when making claims about statistical significance, like Kane et al. actually do here, but do here in a similar inflated veinp. 10); hence, one must always check for practical significance when making claims about statistical significance, like Kane et al. actually do here, but do here in a similar inflated vein.

A stock's price - earnings (P / E) ratio — its share price divided by its earnings per share — is of particular interest to a value investor, as are the price - to - sales ratio, the dividend yield, the price - to - book ratio, and the rate of sales growth.

«Price - Earnings Ratio or P / E Ratio» is a ratio for valuing a company that measures its current share price relative to its per - share earnings.

You will like to educate yourself about some vital terms such as share price, dividend yield, price yield, earning per share (EPS), Price Earnings Ratio (P / E), Price to Book Value, Bullish and Bearish markets etc..

The price - earnings ratio (P / E ratio) is the ratio for valuing a company that measures its current share price relative to its per - share earnings.

In this case, XYZ is priced at $ 130 per share (P / B of 1.3 times $ 100 book value), and is producing $ 13 per share in earnings (13 % ROE on $ 100 book value).

Notes: Price: Closing price per share; P / E: Price to earnings ratio; Total Return: The total return generated by the stock over the last year; Dividend Yield: Expected - annual - dividend divided by price, expressed as a percentage; P / B: Price to Book Value Ratio; Earnings Yield: Earnings divided by Price, expressed as a percentage

For an individual company, the price - to - book (P / B) ratio is the current share price divided by a company's book value (or net worth) per share.

Any valuation of a stock would therefor use P / E to value the productive assets and then add the cash balance per share on top.

Formula: P / B Ratio = Stock Price / Book Value per Share Book Value per Share = (Total Stockholder's Equity — Preferred Equity) / Total Outstanding Shares

The P / E ratio is the market value per share divided by the current year's earnings per share.

The Gen - 1 Value simulation is based on the Russell 1000 Value Index methodology to select stocks from the parent universe according to a composite value score calculated using B / P, five - year sales per share growth, and two - year earnings per share grValue simulation is based on the Russell 1000 Value Index methodology to select stocks from the parent universe according to a composite value score calculated using B / P, five - year sales per share growth, and two - year earnings per share grValue Index methodology to select stocks from the parent universe according to a composite value score calculated using B / P, five - year sales per share growth, and two - year earnings per share grvalue score calculated using B / P, five - year sales per share growth, and two - year earnings per share growth.

A: This represents the future value of the loan (interest inclusive) P: This represents the principal loan amount r: This is the annual interest rate expressed in decimal n: This is the number of times the interest is compounded per year t: This is the number of years the loan will last

The divergence in the P / BV (price divided by book value per share) is even wider: 5.19 for growth and 1.74 for value.

The current 11.625 p share price is a 44 % discount to 20.7 p of net cash / investments per share, and a massive 63 % discount to my latest 31.1 p estimate of intrinsic value per share.

Finally, we'll look at EPS: For the same reasons as above, I'm not prepared to place Fair Value any higher than a 12.5 P / E, which corresponds to $ 3.95 per share based on latest LTM EPS of $ 0.316.

My current Fair Value Price Target is virtually unchanged at GBP 8.08 p per share, offering an Upside Potential of 138 % from the current GBP 3.4 p share price.

If you assume a 9.7 % operating margin deserved a 1.0 P / S multiple, plus net cash & investments, you're looking at a value of $ 1.67 per share — remarkably similar to the buyout price].

I peg my latest Fair Value for ARGO at GBP 31.1 p per share.

In fact, the shares almost reached my original 8.4 p fair value target, with a Nov - 2013 high of 8.25 p per share.

Back in 2012, at 1,543 p per share (close to its peak), I predicted a near - 80 % decline with a fair value of 339p.

The company's price / earnings ratio (P / E) or earnings per share (EPS) is a better way to assess the value of a company.

I also predicted its loss - making CEM unit would be closed down, or sold — contingent on that, I suggested a Secondary Fair Value of 11.0 p per share was also possible.

Table 4 shows that as we reduce the rebalancing frequency of the equal - weighted portfolio from the base case of 1 month to 6 months and then to 12 months, the per annum alpha of the equal - weighted portfolio drops from 175 basis points to 117 basis points and then to 80 basis points.Once the rebalancing frequency of the equal - weighted portfolio is 12 months, the difference in the alpha of the equal - weighted portfolio and that of the value - and price - weighted portfolios is no longer statistically significant (the p - value for the difference in alpha of the equal - and value - weighted portfolios is 0.96 and for the difference of the equal - and price - weighted portfolios is 0.98).

Which knocked my Fair Value targets back to 5.1 p & 6.8 p per share, respectively.

(GBP 25.30 p P / E Val + GBP 22.25 p P / S Val + GBP 30.10 p Asset Val) / 3 = GBP 25.9 p Fair Value per share, for an Upside Potential of 130 % (from current GBP 11.25 p market pricep P / E Val + GBP 22.25 p P / S Val + GBP 30.10 p Asset Val) / 3 = GBP 25.9 p Fair Value per share, for an Upside Potential of 130 % (from current GBP 11.25 p market priceP / E Val + GBP 22.25 p P / S Val + GBP 30.10 p Asset Val) / 3 = GBP 25.9 p Fair Value per share, for an Upside Potential of 130 % (from current GBP 11.25 p market pricep P / S Val + GBP 30.10 p Asset Val) / 3 = GBP 25.9 p Fair Value per share, for an Upside Potential of 130 % (from current GBP 11.25 p market priceP / S Val + GBP 30.10 p Asset Val) / 3 = GBP 25.9 p Fair Value per share, for an Upside Potential of 130 % (from current GBP 11.25 p market pricep Asset Val) / 3 = GBP 25.9 p Fair Value per share, for an Upside Potential of 130 % (from current GBP 11.25 p market pricep Fair Value per share, for an Upside Potential of 130 % (from current GBP 11.25 p market pricep market price)

The basics of Earnings per share (EPS), P / E Ratio, Book Value, P / BV, Dividend, Return on Equity (ROE), Return on capital employed (ROCE), debt / equity ratio etc should be known to you before you analyze a stock.

Price - to - earnings ratio (P / E ratio)-- A ratio for valuing a company that measures its current share price relative to its per - share earnings.

All in all, I'm happy for the moment to average the above valuations into a single new GBP 5.9 p Fair Value target per share.

Fortunately, there was such a huge gap between investors» standard P / E-based * approach vs. my own perspective on Applegreen's unique float - driven model & underlying free cash flow - based valuation, that the shares still trade (despite new all - time highs) well shy of my original $ 8.61 Fair Value per share.

Universe Group (UNG: LN): My last UNG post, a year ago, laid out three approaches to valuation: Value, Growth & Activist Investor Perspectives, ranging from a 7.4 p to 17.1 p Fair Value per share.

-LRB-(EUR 3,074 million LTM Revenue * 0.125 P / S + 99.7 m Cash / Inv Property / Securities) / 329.9 m Shares + EUR 0.088 EPS * 11 P / E) / 2 = EUR 1.22 Fair Value per share (for an Upside Potential of 53 %)

It now trades on a 0.64 P / B — a re-rating to a 1.00 P / B would imply a EUR 10.91 Fair Value per share, and a 56 % Upside Potential.

Overall, this leaves TOT on a P / E of only 6.2, and implies very v minor amendments to my Fair Value Price Target, which now stands at EUR 0.912 per share, for an Upside Potential of 103 % vs. the current EUR 0.45 share price.

(EUR 14.0 M Revenue * 1.2 P / S + 3.2 M Debt Adjustment + 2.7 M Cash + 0.4 M Option Cash + 0.6 M YTD Cash Generation) / (97.9 M Shares + 7.8 M Option Shares) = EUR 0.225 Fair Value per share

I think this is highly unlikely, but if it turned out to be the case, I believe we're still looking at net cash / investments of GBP 17.3 p per share & an intrinsic value of GBP 29.3 p.

(92.0 mio carats * 67 % * $ 1.00) Resources + $ 6.255 mio Inventory + $ 4.746 mio Adj Cash + $ 4.092 mio Cash Raised — $ 1.371 mio Debt = $ 75.4 million / 147.686 mio shares = $ 0.51 or GBP 32.5 p Fair Value per share