EDUCATION CONNECTION Professional Development Specialist Susan Domanico, CEA Teacher Development Specialist Kate Field, and AFT - Connecticut Professional Issues and Development Coordinator Jennifer Benevento talked to
PEAC about their work with Professional Development and Evaluation Committees.
Not exact matches
and to see how well the views expressed here
about assessment and reporting match so well with the way we are approaching this in the Primary Extension and Challenge (
PEAC) Program in Perth, Western Australia.
Many of the issues articulated by
PEAC members are ones that CEA has voiced concern
about already and addressed in the proposed CEA teacher evaluation guidelines released at a news conference last week.
It's significant that
PEAC's recommendation is unanimous, for 2 reasons: First, it appears that the leadership shown by CEA last year in striving to work with
PEAC members to have deeper discussions
about the issues has been successful, which, in turn has brought a more clear understanding of the negative impact brought
about by including mastery test scores in teacher evaluation; and second, a unanimous decision will, hopefully, have a greater impact on the way the State Board of Education discusses and reviews the recommendation.
Training for evaluators is one area that CEA leaders on the Council have previously highlighted as needing attention, and yesterday
PEAC heard from administrators in the Wolcott Public Schools
about their efforts to improve evaluator training.
We have several concerns
about the amount of work that must be done by
PEAC in order to guide the work of the four work groups (teacher evaluation, administrator evaluation, pupil services evaluation, and implementation).
The state Performance Evaluation Advisory Council (
PEAC) has been consumed in recent years by reports from consultants, disagreements
about what's best for students and teachers, and plenty of eduspeak — all in pursuit of a new teacher evaluation system.
«Teachers are very concerned
about the direction and process that appears to be evolving on the Performance Evaluation Advisory Council (
PEAC), and we would like the Board to consider our concerns before adopting evaluation guidelines and piloting them,» said Loftus Levine.
But it only took commonsense comments from thousands of teachers for
PEAC to reach consensus
about new flexibility in the implementation of the new evaluation and support system, and to relieve the significant demands and pressures on teachers and administrators who simultaneously must also implement the Common Core State Standards.