I must say that I sympathise with
your PNAS reviewers... I don't get what you mean either: --RRB-
Does having achieved a certain level of eminence in your field mean your papers are not scrutinised (by
PNAS reviewers) as lesser mortals» might be?
Not exact matches
PNAS confirmed that Venter chose all three
reviewers for the study.
«I'm surprised that the authors, the
reviewers, and the editors [of the
PNAS paper] didn't see this,» Albers says.
When you publish in
PNAS do you get in on the «scam» by picking your own
reviewers?