Sentences with phrase «pns scale»

These findings from the present research supported that the PNS - J was mostly comparable to the original PNS Scale.

Confirmatory factor analyses showed that the two - factor model of the PNS - J fit the data better than the one - factor model, as shown in the studies that validated the original PNS Scale.

The PNS Scale was translated into languages such as German (Machunsky & Meiser, 2006), Dutch (Rietzschel et al., 2007), and Chinese (Shi, Wang, & Chen, 2009), and validation of these translated versions were conducted in each country.

However, to the best of the author's knowledge, there exists no Japanese - translated version of the PNS Scale that is comparable to the original version.

Although the original PNS Scale was written in English, the use of the PNS Scale has become widespread in non-native English - speaking countries as well.

The original PNS Scale that was validated by Neuberg & Newsom (1993) was translated by following translation back - translation steps in order to keep the semantic equivalence between the original and the translated versions.

Although the validation study of the original PNS Scale (Neuberg & Newsom, 1993) also reported that the two subscales of the PNS Scale positively correlated with variables that are related to the rigidity of one's cognition?such as dogmatism (Rokeach, 1960) and intolerance of ambiguity (Eysenck, 1954)?

Validation studies of the original (Neuberg & Newsom, 1993) and the Chinese (Shi et al., 2009) versions of the PNS Scale consistently reported following results: the Desire for Structure subscale positively correlated with Conscientiousness subscale (rs =.35 -.41); the Response to Lack of Structure subscale negatively correlated with the Extraversion (rs = −.23 - −.18) and Openness subscales (rs = −.44 - −.41), and positively correlated with the Neuroticism subscale (rs =.31 -.32).

The PNS Scale consists of two subscales: the Desire for Structure subscale (e.g., «I enjoy having a clear and structured mode of life,» 4 items) and the Response to Lack of Structure subscale (e.g., «It upsets me to go into a situation without knowing what I can expect from it,» 7 items).

To assess PNS, the 11 - item PNS Scale validated by Neuberg & Newsom (1993) was widely used among self - reporting questionnaires in the previous research.

Although Suzuki & Sakurai (1999) tried developing a Japanese version, they did not follow appropriate translation back - translation steps and changed the contents of some items without permission of the authors of the original PNS Scale.

Not exact matches

The difficulty with the IPCC is in miniature the problem with PNS: the corruption of those self - appointed to adjudicate the suitability of the science and its practitioners rapidly moves to the «absolute» end of the scale.

The PNS - J used a 7 - point Likert scale with the anchors 1: strongly disagree to 4: neither agree nor disagree to 7: strongly agree.

The PNS - J and the Japanese versions of the Ten - Item Personality Inventory and the Need for Cognition Scale were administered at T1 and T2.

Future research in Japan should implement a wide range of application of the PNS - J and conduct further validation of the scale to overcome the limitations noted above.

Study 2 examined correlation between the PNS - J and other related variables (big - five personality traits and need for cognition) to show convergent and discriminant evidence of validity of the PNS - J, and evaluated test - retest reliability of the scale.