Not exact matches
Future
studies with larger numbers of breastfeeding mothers could allow for
paired comparisons before and after an intervention, as well as analysis of the impact of independent variables like gender, year of training, age, or previous breastfeeding experience.
In this situation, sensitivity on the IAT means that
study participants would have a greater difference in response times to congruent
pairings of shape and sound (a high position in space, and a high pitch, for example) in
comparison to incongruent
pairings.
The base
pair numbers do not correspond to those provided by Roses et al because the present numbers refer to the total length of the polymerase chain reaction product, not the number of polyT repeats (see http://neuroscienceresearch.wustl.edu/Pages/cruchaga2011.aspx for quality control and call
comparison between the present
study and previous
studies).
We conducted a similar
comparison study, but observed our parent - child
pairs as they read an e-book on an iPad as well as a print book.
Summary: (To include
comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) The authors note that two - thirds of
study participants were randomly assigned to intervention conditions, while the remaining
pairs were assigned based on caseload and scheduling factors.
Summary: (To include
comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) Note: This
study is a follow - up of 58 mother - infant
pairs from the Cohen et al. (1999)
study described above.
Type of
Study: Pretest - posttest with nonmatched
comparison group Number of Participants: 30 mother - child
pairs