Sentences with phrase «palestinian areas»

According to 21c the miserable state of the Alexander, which runs through both Israel and the Palestinian Authority, is one of the reasons why researchers have joined to restore the quality of not only the Alexander, but the 15 rivers that flow through both Israeli and Palestinian areas.

Working in the Public Policy Department of Tel Aviv University, Dr. Lounsbury will examine pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs), one class of contaminants, to determine best practices and risk assessment for waste water reuse, both in Israeli and in Palestinian areas.

He says that water for Jericho, which will be one of the first Palestinian areas to be given some autonomy, has become saline because of overabstraction through new boreholes dug by Israelis.

Areas A and B were Palestinian areas; they had full control over area A but Israel retained security control of Area B. Area C, easily the largest region, consisted of land (including the settlements) Israel retained control of.

This means that different governments control the Gaza Strip and Palestinian areas of the West Bank, but as these areas are under Palestinian control, and as Israel granted the Palestinians these areas, there is little controversy as to whether or not these areas should be under Palestinian control.

A recent workshop in Stockholm brought together work as varied as West European attitudes to Eastern Europe from the eighteenth century to 1989, Israeli students» knowledge of the Palestinian areas of the country, the conflicting mental maps of 20th century Lebanon, mental maps of Europe based on quantitative evidence from surveys of European and extra-European students, and comparative work on mental maps in the Baltic and Mediterranean regions.

Moreover, the Israeli army would regain control of Palestinian areas and might impose even harsher military rule.

While Zababdeh has averted the huge disasters that have befallen many Palestinian areas during the past seven months, it has not been immune to the occupation's crushing blows.

Not exact matches

So, basically, Israel is using Gaza as an excuse to slice and dice the West Bank into separated small areas of Palestinians who are all effectively in prison camps even though most people living in the West Bank just want to live in peace and not be attacked regularly by Israeli settlers.

This story will go on for ever until the date life ends on Earth... this ever lasting conflict was planted there because ever since it started it created jobs for war arms manufacturers, it has created good business revenue for war and arms lords, made a good business for those con - fis - cat - ing Palestinians lands & olive trees, turning them in to residential areas for imported Jews, gradually removing Palestinians of all faiths further out of range every time...?

Next, I will instruct our Armed Forces to move in force to Israel and remove all peoples from that area and ship them to Diego Garcia as their new home; Jewish and Palestinian alike.

In Israel, there is not the critical mass of Christians necessary for authentic dialogue, and the Palestinian Christians native to the area are politically traumatized and, to put it gently, disinclined to dialogue.

The area the Palestinians are fighting for was originally all in Jordan, but if one man loses his farm, and then loses his family while they are fighting for their land, what do you expect him to do?

Also remember that Israel fires rockets, mortars, chemical weapons, bullets, etc etc from an area that the Palestinians were forced to flee from because Israel invaded and took land that doesn't belong to them.

I can not at this point enter into the discussion of types of Diaspora Judaism affected by contact with paganism; I wish only to record my conviction (1) that Paul's Judaism was not of the orthodox Palestinian type, which later became normal, and normative; and (2) that early Gentile Christianity, both before Paul and also outside the area of his influence, was far more substantial than the Book of Acts and the surviving Pauline letters have led many to assume.

Gee... I wonder what would happen if the US government finally decided that continuing to help Israel rid the area of Palestinians so that god can return as the Bible states is well... stupid and counter — productive to the interests of the US?

Thousands of Palestinians have protested along Gaza's sealed border with Israel, engulfing the volatile area in black smoke from burning tyres.

Welby finished his visit by walking down Shuhada Street - an area under Israeli military control which has been closed to Palestinians for nearly two decades.

Welby received briefings on the history of the area as well as the current political situation from the Palestinian director of Hebron Rehabilitation Council (HRC) Imad Hamdan.

Welby praised the «utterly inspiring» work of HRC who aim to revive Hebron's Old City by renovating old buildings and encouraging Palestinians to move into the area, despite the high level of political tensions.

The larger area - H1 is controlled by the Palestinian Authority, while Israel retains military control in H2.

Israeli border police shot a Palestinian man in the area last week.

Jewish worshipers often enter Joseph's Tomb, but are generally escorted by Israeli soldiers after coordination with Palestinian security officials in the area.

The Oslo Accords divided the West Bank and the Gaza Strip into three sections, areas A, B, and C. Area C is under full Israeli control, Area B is under Israeli military control but Palestinian civil control, and area A (comprising major Palestinian population centers) is under Palestinian military and civil contArea C is under full Israeli control, Area B is under Israeli military control but Palestinian civil control, and area A (comprising major Palestinian population centers) is under Palestinian military and civil contArea B is under Israeli military control but Palestinian civil control, and area A (comprising major Palestinian population centers) is under Palestinian military and civil contarea A (comprising major Palestinian population centers) is under Palestinian military and civil control.

This would include area C (though the term more traditionally used for these areas, albeit still controversially, is «Palestinian Territories»).

The Oslo Accords were only intended to define interim borders until a final settlement had been negotiated, but in the mean time, Israel recognizes Palestinian sovereignty over the areas specified in the Oslo Accords.

Just as a clarifying note: The areas Israel captured were not «Palestinian» land at the moments.

However, after Israel ceded all areas of the Gaza strip to the Palestinians in 2005, Hamas violently overthrew the Palestinian Authority government in Gaza and established control over Gaza.

Here you will find much more controversy, as many classify area C of the West Bank as part of Israel, or at least not as Palestinian.

The light brown areas is that the Palestinian Authority currently controls, and the rest is what Israel controls.

Giving these areas to the Palestinians is currently not possible because many Israeli Jews feel that they are part of their historical homeland.

At the same time, it would transfer Arab - Israeli areas to the Palestinian state.

The Oslo Accords were intended to establish only an interim government until a final settlement could be negotiated, but as the Israelis and Palestinians have, as of yet, failed to reach an agreement, the Area divisions in the West Bank still stand (though, as mentioned previously, Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005).

Israel and the PLO negotiated the Oslo Accords, which granted the Palestinians limited self - government over many areas of the West Bank and Gaza.

Area B is under Palestinian military control but Israeli civil control, and Area C is under Israeli civil and military control.

From what was, at times, a confused and halting justification for this position your correspondent gleaned three interrelated strands of argument: that the lands of Judea and Samaria are the Jewish people's «homeland;» that while the area is also claimed as a homeland by the Palestinians this merely means the territory is contested and does not detract from the Jewish claim and finally; that the Palestinians lost their right to this land by engaging in violence in 1948 and 1967.

Very few Palestinians live in those areas: the settlement blocs are overwhelmingly comprised of Jews.

The right of self - determination is typically a right of a «nation», i.e. a group of people who share a national identity (e.g. Kurds or Palestinians or Navajos or Kosovars or Scots) who are the dominant population of a compact and contiguous geographic area.

In order to contend persuasively that the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs is at the core of the regional problems one has to be able to demonstrate that its resolution would have prevented at least any of the major events that have taken place in the area or would have created a considerably different regional reality than the one prevailing at present.

Yet, what its government is orchestrating in the West Bank's areas B and C (respectively 60 % and 22 % of the West Bank) is the use of security as an alibi to permanently station its military forces, control Palestinian mobility, and seize unoccupied (or partly occupied) Palestinian land.

Area C is 70 % + of the West Bank and areas A and B are in a myriad non-contiguous chunks, so Palestinians have to go through area C to go between citArea C is 70 % + of the West Bank and areas A and B are in a myriad non-contiguous chunks, so Palestinians have to go through area C to go between citarea C to go between cities.

This area consists of densely populated Palestinian metropolitan areas.

A small percentage of Palestinians live in Area C, which is not subject to the same laws as Israel is, but those Palestinians are not citizens of Israel (and almost every Palestinian who has been offered citizenship has declined).

In Area B, the Palestinians would have civil control, but the area would be under Israeli military contArea B, the Palestinians would have civil control, but the area would be under Israeli military contarea would be under Israeli military control.

The Oslo Accords, signed in 1993 through 1995, were intended to grant Palestinians autonomy over certain areas of the West Bank and Gaza.

All parties in the conflict recognize Palestinian control of those areas (though the PNA and Israel object to Hamas» control of Gaza), so we can, without much ambiguity, refer to Areas A and B of the West Bank, as well as the Gaza Strip, as Palesareas (though the PNA and Israel object to Hamas» control of Gaza), so we can, without much ambiguity, refer to Areas A and B of the West Bank, as well as the Gaza Strip, as PalesAreas A and B of the West Bank, as well as the Gaza Strip, as Palestine.

In 1994, Israel agreed to divide the West Bank and Gaza into three areas, Areas A, B, and C. Area C would remain under Israeli military and civil control (though would not become part of Israel unless a final status agreement resulted in that), Area B would be under Israeli military control and Palestinian civil control, and area A would be under full Palestinian conareas, Areas A, B, and C. Area C would remain under Israeli military and civil control (though would not become part of Israel unless a final status agreement resulted in that), Area B would be under Israeli military control and Palestinian civil control, and area A would be under full Palestinian conAreas A, B, and C. Area C would remain under Israeli military and civil control (though would not become part of Israel unless a final status agreement resulted in that), Area B would be under Israeli military control and Palestinian civil control, and area A would be under full Palestinian contArea C would remain under Israeli military and civil control (though would not become part of Israel unless a final status agreement resulted in that), Area B would be under Israeli military control and Palestinian civil control, and area A would be under full Palestinian contArea B would be under Israeli military control and Palestinian civil control, and area A would be under full Palestinian contarea A would be under full Palestinian control.

Oslo I was roughly a framework for negotiations, the Gaza - Jericho agreement provided for a limited amount of Palestinian autonomy within the Gaza Strip and Jericho following IDF redeployment, and the third agreement, Oslo II, divided the West Bank into areas with the goal of interim self - government pending final status negotiations, which would include the «difficult» issues: the division of Jerusalem, the Palestinian refugees, the borders, Jewish settlements in Palestinian territory, as well as security.

In Area A, Palestinians would have full military and civil control.

On 24 October 2017, a cross party group of UK parliamentarians wrote to the Foreign Secretary about compensation for demoltions of Palestinian structures in Area C of the West Bank.