In the years prior to the 2014 Gaza conflict, far left - wing and Islamist traditions came together and cross-fertilized each other in the context of the failure of the Israeli -
Palestinian peace process, the Second Intifada, the Durban conference, the 9/11 attacks, and widespread and fierce public protests against the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Not exact matches
«
Palestinians say
peace process hasn't worked.»
«The
Palestinian president was perfectly fine with this idea of not having the United States as the only interlocutor for the
peace process, but of having a multilateral framework in which the European Union has a central role that is together with others, including our partners in the Quartet, including the United States,» she added.
Anatol Lieven, writing recently in the London Review of Books, points to a 1996 policy paper «A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,» by Perle and Douglas Feith, which advised Netanyahu to abandon the Oslo
peace process and return to military repression of the
Palestinians.
According to the consensus among American commentators, reflecting the views of the administration and Congress, a
peace process that was on the verge of a breakthrough a few months ago has broken down because of the
Palestinians» intransigence.
In terms of virtually every index, whether per capita income, freedom of movement or otherwise, the lives of ordinary
Palestinians have gotten worse since the current «
peace process» began in 1991.
The
peace process for the Middle East must have ironclad deadlines and fixed objectives: a rapid and phased end to occupation, the complete removal of settlements,
Palestinian self - determination and statehood with Jerusalem as a capital for both Palestine and Israel, and a real security framework for all nations of the region.
On some core issues involving Israel, they're well to the left of Netanyahu and many Americans: They refer to the «West Bank,» not to «Judea and Samaria,» fervently supported the Oslo
peace process and Israel's unilateral withdrawal from Gaza and believe in the urgency of creating a
Palestinian state.
If Israel were to decide not to prop up the
Palestinian Authority but to let it fall, the «
peace process» begun in 1993 might fall apart in a matter of days.
The essays gathered in The End of the
Peace Process speak eloquently and defiantly of the failure of
Palestinian leaders to recognize the need to move from a revolutionary guerrilla entity to a mature democratic movement representing the needs of its constituency within and outside of the occupied territories.
The crisis in Gaza and tragic loss of
Palestinian and Israeli life shows why the region and the world can not afford this vacuum in the
peace process.
We would not support a strong reaction which undermined the
peace process by sidelining President Abbas or risked the collapse of the
Palestinian authority.
Illegal settlement activity in the West Bank, which we condemn, threatens the very viability of the
peace process, and after many decades the
Palestinians still do not have the state they aspire to.
The most depressing aspect of the situation is that despite its proven inability to make progress on the
Palestinian track, America continues to cling to its monopoly over the
peace process.
Mansour at the U.S. echoed this view, saying there is «no chance» that
Palestinians will engage in a U.S. - led
peace process.
The justification of the
Palestinian officials for not openly accusing Israel of assassination at the time was simple; they didn't want to jeopardise the
peace process, so they made a sacrifice.
On the value of these delegations in giving a first - class intensive examination of the issues impacting on the
peace process and
Palestinians living under occupation and blockade, Caabu Director Chris Doyle writes: «The overwhelming majority of delegates return energised by what they have seen and with a sense of duty to address the injustices they have witnessed.
Speaking to the Financial Times, he insisted the
Palestinian group must recognise Israel's right to exist if it is to take part in the
peace process.
He is currently serving as UN secretary general's special co-ordinator for the Middle East
peace process and his special representative to the
Palestinian Liberation Organisation.
The Liberal Democrats position is that they wish to recognise a democratic, sovereign and viable
Palestinian state when it will help the
peace process most.
Haaretz.com provides extensive and in - depth coverage of Israel, the Jewish World and the Middle East, including defense, diplomacy, the Arab - Israeli conflict, the
peace process, Israeli politics, Jerusalem affairs, international relations, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the
Palestinian Authority, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the Israeli business world and Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora.
In fact, students have to win PeaceMaker, a simulation of the Middle East
peace process, twice — once while playing as the Israeli prime minister and once as the
Palestinian president.