Sentences with phrase «panel on climate change science»

To me, that says the climate science community — including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change science working group — has not adequately conveyed the reality you state here.

Not exact matches

The panel released a condensed version of the first part of the report, on the physical science basis of climate change, in February.

He has served on the National Research Council and the National Science Foundation and was a lead author on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) team.

On climate science: «As summarized in the 2013 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), there continues to be significant progress in climate sciencOn climate science: «As summarized in the 2013 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), there continues to be significant progress in climate sclimate science: «As summarized in the 2013 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), there continues to be significant progress in climate sciencon Climate Change (IPCC), there continues to be significant progress in climate sClimate Change (IPCC), there continues to be significant progress in climate sclimate science.

The 2007 International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the most authoritative source of climate science, spelled out the likely consequences of inaction, including extreme heat and precipitation, droughts, and risinClimate Change (IPCC), the most authoritative source of climate science, spelled out the likely consequences of inaction, including extreme heat and precipitation, droughts, and risinclimate science, spelled out the likely consequences of inaction, including extreme heat and precipitation, droughts, and rising seas.

Last week, representatives from 85 countries gathered in Busan, South Korea, to approve the formation of the Intergovernmental Science - Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), which will operate much like the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

In the «post-truth» world, the role of science is changing, said Amy Luers, director of climate change at the Skoll Global Threats Fund, during a panel on «The Role of Scientists in Producing and Defending Evidence.»

And it is also clear — even to the negotiators who also agreed to be «informed» by the science expected from the International Government Panel on Climate Change's next assessment report in 2013 — that neither the «Durban Platform for Enhanced Action» nor the extended Kyoto Protocol are equal to the task of restraining ever - rising greenhouse gas emissions.

Such a transition has been made possible by the convergence of several factors: a stream of new science showing an accelerating pace of climate change and its impacts; the everyday experience of people witnessing the change around them (and seeing it on the evening news); the compelling portrayals of what is happening and why, such as Al Gore's documentary An Inconvenient Truth and the 2007 reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; and the shifting stances of constituencies as diverse as evangelical Christians (who argue for protecting the climate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national secclimate change and its impacts; the everyday experience of people witnessing the change around them (and seeing it on the evening news); the compelling portrayals of what is happening and why, such as Al Gore's documentary An Inconvenient Truth and the 2007 reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; and the shifting stances of constituencies as diverse as evangelical Christians (who argue for protecting the climate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national secuchange and its impacts; the everyday experience of people witnessing the change around them (and seeing it on the evening news); the compelling portrayals of what is happening and why, such as Al Gore's documentary An Inconvenient Truth and the 2007 reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; and the shifting stances of constituencies as diverse as evangelical Christians (who argue for protecting the climate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national secuchange around them (and seeing it on the evening news); the compelling portrayals of what is happening and why, such as Al Gore's documentary An Inconvenient Truth and the 2007 reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; and the shifting stances of constituencies as diverse as evangelical Christians (who argue for protecting the climate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national secClimate Change; and the shifting stances of constituencies as diverse as evangelical Christians (who argue for protecting the climate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national secuChange; and the shifting stances of constituencies as diverse as evangelical Christians (who argue for protecting the climate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national secclimate on grounds of stewardship of God's creation) and military leaders (who argue on grounds of national security).

More recently Rosenzweig helped chair the New York City Panel on Climate Change, brought together to update the city on the latest climate science and to help city agencies prepare toClimate Change, brought together to update the city on the latest climate science and to help city agencies prepare toclimate science and to help city agencies prepare to adapt.

With these words, Thomas Stocker of the University of Bern in Switzerland summed up the new assessment of climate science by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change climate science by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Climate Change (IPCC).

Since the early 1970s, this climatologist and science popularizer has been a fixture on TV news shows, on Capitol Hill, and on White House panels, where he weighs in on both the politics and science of climate change.

Several questions in the 2010 survey addressed the «Climategate» controversy, which brought allegations of flawed science by researchers contributing to the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Katharine Mach, who served as co-director of science on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), will present her most recent findings on the trials and triumphs of achieving a consensus on climate sClimate Change (IPCC), will present her most recent findings on the trials and triumphs of achieving a consensus on climate sclimate science.

The InterAcademy Council, a coalition of world science academies, has released a 113 - page review of the management of the world's most prominent climate body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate climate body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Climate Change.

Those are some of the key messages in the «Summary for Policymakers» of the physical science of global warming from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released on September 27.

Although collaborative efforts benefit from as many voices as possible, Llewellyn Smith said that it was important for those running such projects, such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research, to strike a balance between a desire to include everyone and an overemphasis on doing so at the expense of quality science.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) sent a strongly worded message to policymakers around the world early today: The new science of the past 6 years has only reinforced the already - confident conclusions of the 2007 IPCC assessment report.

It relied on a raft of published materials, including work by the Nobel Peace Prize - winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and a series of 21 studies from the U.S. Climate Change Science Program.

The report is the latest from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which releases detailed assessments of climate science every fewClimate Change (IPCC), which releases detailed assessments of climate science every fewclimate science every few years.

The research was given prominence in the 2001 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and then was picked up by many in the wider science community and by the popular media.

The full quote:» Three investigations of the alleged scientific misconduct of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia — one by the UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, a second by the Scientific Assessment Panel of the Royal Society, chaired by Lord Oxburgh, and the latest by the Independent Climate Change E-mails Review, chaired by Sir Muir Russell — have confirmed what climate scientists have never seriously doubted: established scientists depend on their credibility and have no motivation in purposely misleading the public and their collClimate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia — one by the UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, a second by the Scientific Assessment Panel of the Royal Society, chaired by Lord Oxburgh, and the latest by the Independent Climate Change E-mails Review, chaired by Sir Muir Russell — have confirmed what climate scientists have never seriously doubted: established scientists depend on their credibility and have no motivation in purposely misleading the public and their collClimate Change E-mails Review, chaired by Sir Muir Russell — have confirmed what climate scientists have never seriously doubted: established scientists depend on their credibility and have no motivation in purposely misleading the public and their collclimate scientists have never seriously doubted: established scientists depend on their credibility and have no motivation in purposely misleading the public and their colleagues.

In December 2013, Susan, Science Director Richard Somerville, and photographer James Balog of Chasing Ice conducted a panel on communicating climate change at the fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union (AGU).

[T] he idea that the sun is currently driving climate change is strongly rejected by the world's leading authority on climate science, the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which found in its latest (2013) report that «There is high confidence that changes in total solar irradiance have not contributed to the increase in global mean surface temperature over the period 1986 to 2008, based on direct satellite measurements of total solar irradiance.climate change is strongly rejected by the world's leading authority on climate science, the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which found in its latest (2013) report that «There is high confidence that changes in total solar irradiance have not contributed to the increase in global mean surface temperature over the period 1986 to 2008, based on direct satellite measurements of total solar irradiance.&change is strongly rejected by the world's leading authority on climate science, the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which found in its latest (2013) report that «There is high confidence that changes in total solar irradiance have not contributed to the increase in global mean surface temperature over the period 1986 to 2008, based on direct satellite measurements of total solar irradiance.climate science, the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which found in its latest (2013) report that «There is high confidence that changes in total solar irradiance have not contributed to the increase in global mean surface temperature over the period 1986 to 2008, based on direct satellite measurements of total solar irradiance.Climate Change, which found in its latest (2013) report that «There is high confidence that changes in total solar irradiance have not contributed to the increase in global mean surface temperature over the period 1986 to 2008, based on direct satellite measurements of total solar irradiance.&Change, which found in its latest (2013) report that «There is high confidence that changes in total solar irradiance have not contributed to the increase in global mean surface temperature over the period 1986 to 2008, based on direct satellite measurements of total solar irradiance.»

The next year, as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was publishing its second major assessment of climate science, Shell found itself in a delicate balancing act between accepting the scientific consensus and arguing that there was still too much uncertainty to dictate aggressive Climate Change was publishing its second major assessment of climate science, Shell found itself in a delicate balancing act between accepting the scientific consensus and arguing that there was still too much uncertainty to dictate aggressive climate science, Shell found itself in a delicate balancing act between accepting the scientific consensus and arguing that there was still too much uncertainty to dictate aggressive action.

Climate change 2013: the physical science basis; contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Cchange 2013: the physical science basis; contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeChange.

In a couple of weeks, the UN's official advisors on climate change science, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will update its global assessment on theclimate change science, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will update its global assessment on the change science, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will update its global assessment on theClimate Change (IPCC) will update its global assessment on the Change (IPCC) will update its global assessment on the issue.

Jean - Pascal Van Ypersele, Intergovernemental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Vice-chair and Professor of climate sciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium contributed to the conference with a clear message from the IPCC, showing that the Arctic is very vulnerable to climate Climate Change (IPCC) Vice-chair and Professor of climate sciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium contributed to the conference with a clear message from the IPCC, showing that the Arctic is very vulnerable to climate cChange (IPCC) Vice-chair and Professor of climate sciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium contributed to the conference with a clear message from the IPCC, showing that the Arctic is very vulnerable to climate climate sciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium contributed to the conference with a clear message from the IPCC, showing that the Arctic is very vulnerable to climate climate changechange.

«Our primary source for climate science was the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report, which we augmented with other peer - reviewed analyses and contracted reclimate science was the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report, which we augmented with other peer - reviewed analyses and contracted reClimate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report, which we augmented with other peer - reviewed analyses and contracted research.

An update on the science since publication of the Fourth Assessment Report (FAR) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2007.

The first installment in the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's latest scientific assessment on climate science came out on Friday, and it's loaded with dense terminology, expressions of uncertainty, and nearly impenetrable grClimate Change's latest scientific assessment on climate science came out on Friday, and it's loaded with dense terminology, expressions of uncertainty, and nearly impenetrable grclimate science came out on Friday, and it's loaded with dense terminology, expressions of uncertainty, and nearly impenetrable graphics.

Michael serves on the U.S. National Academies Board on Energy and Environmental Systems and the New York City Climate Change Panel, and is a science advisor to the Environmental Defense Fund.

A committee convened by the InterAcademy Council, the association of the world's leading national science academies, delivered a long to - do list to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change on Monday, including steps ranging from limiting the term and policy recommendations of its leadership to fostering more transparency in its machinations and being more careful to describe the science determining the strength, or weakness, of particular conclusions.

For his part, Mr. Monckton says there is no need to exploit such events because he and others have exposed fatal weaknesses in the mainstream view that a strong warming effect is due to rising concentrations of carbon dioxide — regardless of the peer - reviewed, Nobel Prize - winning work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the conclusions of various national academies of science and 100 years of growing accord on the basics.

Once again, I'd like to think that these groups» conclusions on the science, along with the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, can help bound, at least a little, the comments on Dot Earth on climate science and its implicClimate Change, can help bound, at least a little, the comments on Dot Earth on climate science and its implicclimate science and its implications.

We reconfirm the significance of the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as providing the most comprehensive assessment of the science and encourage the continuation of the science - based approach that should guide our climate protection eClimate Change (IPCC) as providing the most comprehensive assessment of the science and encourage the continuation of the science - based approach that should guide our climate protection eclimate protection efforts.

Updates below, 10:03 a.m. To my eye, perhaps the most important line in the summary of the new report on global warming science from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is this:

That's why no one should expect the next review of climate science from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to suddenly create a harmonious path fclimate science from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to suddenly create a harmonious path fClimate Change to suddenly create a harmonious path forward.

It's an important moment for this message to sink in, because the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, meeting this week in Bangkok, is getting ready to dive in on a special report on the benefits of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above Earth's temperature a century or more ago and emissions paths to accomplish that (to learn what this murky number means in relation to the more familiar 2 - degree limit click here for a quick sketch, basic science, deep dive).

The InterAcademy Council, the global association of national science academies, is going to assess how the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change undertakes its assessments of climate science and policy cClimate Change undertakes its assessments of climate science and policy cclimate science and policy choices.

I have an article in Tuesday's Science Times assessing next steps for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

It appears that Muller has pushed to get the new findings submitted now because Tuesday is the deadline for journal submission for research to be considered in the next climate science report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate climate science report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Climate Change.

While it did not name the scientist involved, the subject was clearly Susan Solomon, the agency scientist who was the co-leader of the 2007 science report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

This group includes Susan Solomon, the federal climate scientist who led the 2007 science review by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Kenneth Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution and Stanford University and Raymond T. Pierrehumbert of the University of Chicago and (on occasion) Realclimaclimate scientist who led the 2007 science review by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Kenneth Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution and Stanford University and Raymond T. Pierrehumbert of the University of Chicago and (on occasion) RealclimaClimate Change, Kenneth Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution and Stanford University and Raymond T. Pierrehumbert of the University of Chicago and (on occasion) Realclimate.org.

The leaders of the 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change review of the basic science on climate change and its causes have weighed in with a strong defense both of their findings and the individual scientists involved in the hacked e-mail messages andClimate Change review of the basic science on climate change and its causes have weighed in with a strong defense both of their findings and the individual scientists involved in the hacked e-mail messages and Change review of the basic science on climate change and its causes have weighed in with a strong defense both of their findings and the individual scientists involved in the hacked e-mail messages andclimate change and its causes have weighed in with a strong defense both of their findings and the individual scientists involved in the hacked e-mail messages and change and its causes have weighed in with a strong defense both of their findings and the individual scientists involved in the hacked e-mail messages and files.

A new study led by Susan Solomon, a federal climate scientist and co-leader of the 2007 science review by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is fascinating not only for the revelations, but the underlying lessonclimate scientist and co-leader of the 2007 science review by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is fascinating not only for the revelations, but the underlying lessonClimate Change, is fascinating not only for the revelations, but the underlying lessons, too.

The science behind human - induced global warming is far stronger, as documented by the latest assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Some scientists, like Susan Solomon, who directed the writing of the science report issued by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 2007, try to defer from interpreting findings.

It would've been better if the timing had been reversed, given the signs that many of the science findings of the extremes report, from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, are largely not reflected in the statements from the leaders in Dhaka.

If Mann had wanted to point to an opposite end to the spectrum of ways in which scientists can contribute to public discourse on global warming science and risks, a better choice (in my view) would have been Susan Solomon's handling of the rollout of the 2007 science report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.