Not exact matches
For a more current look at what happens when
abortion is severely restricted, we looked to Brazil, where
abortion is illegal except
in cases of rape, when the mother's life is
in danger, and
in the rare instances of anencephaly, a severe fetal anomaly
in which the fetus lacks
parts of the brain, leaving the infant with virtually no chance of survival.
«The biggest reason we've seen all this action on
abortion since the GOP came to power is that social conservatives are still a very important
part of the Republican coalition,» says John Green, an expert
in politics and religion at the University of Akron.
Leaving aside the fact that nearly twenty - five years later legalized
abortion still remains our most pressing legal and social issue, the claim that the issue of
abortion could be medicalized turns out to be wrong
in a way that we should have been able to predict long before: the medical profession has for the most
part declined to join the partnership.
In the Press this was hailed as «Catholic hospital orders ban on abortion referrals» (Daily Telegraph), (etc. etc)... and finally in the Catholic Herald a leader appeared entitled «A Catholic hospital is saved» which went on to say «But the fact remains that, at last, an important Catholic institution in this country has managed to resist the pressure of secularisation — thanks, in part, to the leadership of the Cardinal»
In the Press this was hailed as «Catholic hospital orders ban on
abortion referrals» (Daily Telegraph), (etc. etc)... and finally
in the Catholic Herald a leader appeared entitled «A Catholic hospital is saved» which went on to say «But the fact remains that, at last, an important Catholic institution in this country has managed to resist the pressure of secularisation — thanks, in part, to the leadership of the Cardinal»
in the Catholic Herald a leader appeared entitled «A Catholic hospital is saved» which went on to say «But the fact remains that, at last, an important Catholic institution
in this country has managed to resist the pressure of secularisation — thanks, in part, to the leadership of the Cardinal»
in this country has managed to resist the pressure of secularisation — thanks,
in part, to the leadership of the Cardinal»
in part, to the leadership of the Cardinal».
They say further that even if one does not equate a fetus with a child, as long as one attributes some value to the fetus» and they demonstrate how economists routinely make such outrageous calculations
in insurance claims for loss of body
parts» and put the value as low as one hundredth of a human being, the lowered crime rate would not come near justifying the number of
abortions.
With opposition to
abortion often playing out
in voting for candidates — at least
in part — based on their reproductive stances, and efforts to fight
abortion often playing out
in courtrooms and legislation, the pro-life movement has taken on a distinctly political direction.
When places like these fail to get shut down
in part because we've turned
abortion into such a political issue?
You see,
abortion became legal because of a massive practical problem, which is still taking massive numbers of women's lives
in parts of Africa where
abortion is illegal.
So the politician who votes
in favour of
abortion really does formally co-operate
in a very serious ethical offence: the killing of innocent human beings who are
part of our human family.
He may also be faced with incomprehension and hostility when he tries to persuade the school not to support «Red Nose Day» or «Jeans for Genes»; when he suggests that asking pupils to stand at the front of the class and shout out the names of intimate body
parts is an invasion of their modesty; when he objects to the non-Catholic geography teacher's presentation of solutions for over-population, the «gay rights» agenda seeping
in through text books, the chaplaincyco - ordinator's failure to get
abortion agency leaflets removed from the library, or the school nurse's distribution of cards with information on how to get the morning - after pill.
And
in truth, egregious fibs like the spurious mammogram claim mostly stem from wishful thinking on the
part of defenders of the
abortion giant, rather than from its own publicity materials.
As he makes clear, for the most
part those dealings were ham «fisted, especially when it came to Washington's efforts to establish
abortion as a «human right»
in international law.
But Judge Posner incisively points out that «public support for the [partial - birth
abortion bans] was [
in part] based... on sheer ignorance of the medical realities of late - term
abortion.
Their conservative leanings are
part of a broader trend increasingly documented
in freshman surveys, federal statistics, and public opinion polls, which have found declining rates of approval for casual sex and legal
abortion among the young and a rise
in the percentage of teenagers who say they are virgins.
Leaving aside for the moment the prochoice arguments
in favor of the
abortion liberty, it is clear that great science - based industries, trajectories of medical experimentation, and perhaps the profession of bioethics itself rest
in large
part upon the settlement articulated
in Roe v. Wade and related decisions.
She later converted to become an evangelical Christian and joined the pro-life movement saying her
part in the legalisation of
abortion «was the biggest mistake of my life».
«
In the case of an intrinsically unjust law, such as a law permitting abortion or euthanasia,» the Pope says, «it is... never licit to obey it, or to take part in a propaganda campaign in favor of such a law, or vote for it.&raqu
In the case of an intrinsically unjust law, such as a law permitting
abortion or euthanasia,» the Pope says, «it is... never licit to obey it, or to take
part in a propaganda campaign in favor of such a law, or vote for it.&raqu
in a propaganda campaign
in favor of such a law, or vote for it.&raqu
in favor of such a law, or vote for it.»
In the end, however, Feezell's moderate view (which leans toward the «conservative view») is not too much different in practical effect from my or Hartshorne's moderate view (which leans toward the «liberal view») in that I am only delivering a carte blanche for abortion in the early stages of pregnancy and pointing out that the fetus in the later stages of pregnancy has a moral status analogous to that of an animal, a status which I think deserves considerable attention on our par
In the end, however, Feezell's moderate view (which leans toward the «conservative view») is not too much different
in practical effect from my or Hartshorne's moderate view (which leans toward the «liberal view») in that I am only delivering a carte blanche for abortion in the early stages of pregnancy and pointing out that the fetus in the later stages of pregnancy has a moral status analogous to that of an animal, a status which I think deserves considerable attention on our par
in practical effect from my or Hartshorne's moderate view (which leans toward the «liberal view»)
in that I am only delivering a carte blanche for abortion in the early stages of pregnancy and pointing out that the fetus in the later stages of pregnancy has a moral status analogous to that of an animal, a status which I think deserves considerable attention on our par
in that I am only delivering a carte blanche for
abortion in the early stages of pregnancy and pointing out that the fetus in the later stages of pregnancy has a moral status analogous to that of an animal, a status which I think deserves considerable attention on our par
in the early stages of pregnancy and pointing out that the fetus
in the later stages of pregnancy has a moral status analogous to that of an animal, a status which I think deserves considerable attention on our par
in the later stages of pregnancy has a moral status analogous to that of an animal, a status which I think deserves considerable attention on our
part.
Dreihaus,
part of a group of Democrats that supported a ban on taxpayer funding of
abortion yet — when this provision failed to pass — still voted
in favor of the final health care reform bill, argued that, given his pro-life beliefs, the ad amounted to defamation.
Re: idiot above claiming it is bigoted and dogmatic not to give to a believer charity, if it is ok for believers to argue that no money should be given to Planned Parenthood because it mind find its way to the
part of PP that provides
abortions (70 + % of which are for believers
in th USA), it is ok for non-believers to argue that donations to a cult based charity might find their way to the cult's indoctrination division.
That faulty diagnosis [that Evangelical progressives are a Fifth Column of sorts
in the Democratic Party] seems to be shared
in recent speculation that the Stupak amendment — which went beyond the
abortion neutrality called for by all the Christian progressives I'm aware of — was added to the House health - care bill as
part of a long - standing plan by progressive religious forces.
The battle between Driehaus and a group of progressive Catholic supporters on the one hand and religious conservatives on the other is a reminder that
abortion has become a key issue
in the midterm elections
in parts of the country, even as the economy and jobs remain voters» top concern.
Like ignoring the
part where Jesus
in the Bible
in his own words said nothing about gays or even
abortion...
But I would like to add that many of the reasons an «unwanted» pregnancy happens
in the first place is due
in large
part to the same people who are against anything resembling
abortion... like opposing birth control pills, opposing any form of birth control at all for that matter, opposing s - ex education, and so on.
That a lot of secular progressives are fierce supporters of the
abortion license because they're eugenicists at heart shouldn't come as a surprise; one current member of the Supreme Court, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, had a Gruberian moment some years ago when she admitted
in an interview that legal activists promoting the
abortion license prior to 1973 did so
in part because they thought it would cut down the «growth
in populations that we don't want to have too many of.»
There is a fairly constant onslaught on the fundamental right to life — from Ireland with its proposed referendum on permitting
abortion, to campaigns for increased access to
abortion and euthanasia
in many
parts of the world.
In a recent interview with the Washington Post (part of their ominously titled «Voices of Power» series), Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius discussed Archbishop Joseph Naumann's request that she not present herself for communion because of her public support for legalised abortion: «Well, it was one of the most painful things I have ever experienced in my life, and I am a firm believer in the separation of church and state, and I feel that my actions as a parishioner are different than my actions as a public official and that the people who elected me in Kansas had a right to expect me to uphold their rights and their beliefs even if they did not have the same religious beliefs that I ha
In a recent interview with the Washington Post (
part of their ominously titled «Voices of Power» series), Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius discussed Archbishop Joseph Naumann's request that she not present herself for communion because of her public support for legalised
abortion: «Well, it was one of the most painful things I have ever experienced
in my life, and I am a firm believer in the separation of church and state, and I feel that my actions as a parishioner are different than my actions as a public official and that the people who elected me in Kansas had a right to expect me to uphold their rights and their beliefs even if they did not have the same religious beliefs that I ha
in my life, and I am a firm believer
in the separation of church and state, and I feel that my actions as a parishioner are different than my actions as a public official and that the people who elected me in Kansas had a right to expect me to uphold their rights and their beliefs even if they did not have the same religious beliefs that I ha
in the separation of church and state, and I feel that my actions as a parishioner are different than my actions as a public official and that the people who elected me
in Kansas had a right to expect me to uphold their rights and their beliefs even if they did not have the same religious beliefs that I ha
in Kansas had a right to expect me to uphold their rights and their beliefs even if they did not have the same religious beliefs that I had.
Some may have had no
part to play
in the
abortion decision their spouse or partner made years previously, but they are living with the consequences of that decision and may want to accompany their partner
in seeking healing as a couple; other men go to seek healing for the wound at the heart of their own
abortion experience.
Thirdly, by owning the
part they played
in the
abortion experience and learning to forgive, they are offered real hope that their wound can not only behealed but also be a tremendous grace.
Although I'm not quite sure what Mr. Gardner means by actions being «motivated
in part by the immediate circumstances,» I can assure him that so long as he holds that there are acts, such as direct
abortion and terror bombing, that are wrong
in any circumstances, he stands with us against proportionalism.
Abortion is increasingly legal, available, and socially acceptable
in every
part of the world.
That respect for the past reasserted itself this term
in the surprising 7 «2 reaffirmation of the benighted Miranda decision, and it played a
part in the partial «birth
abortion case.
Some men have taken
part in this process by coercing girlfriends into getting
abortions.
«It is stomach - churning to hear a top doctor for the national Planned Parenthood organization admit, on videotape, that Planned Parenthood abortionists can and will alter late
abortion procedures to facilitate the harvesting of intact baby body
parts — she specifically mentioned hearts, lungs, livers, even intact heads —
in order to fill specific pre-orders,» said National Right to Life president Carol Tobias
in a statement.
In June 1983, Lynn Hilliard, a part - time nurse in a Winnipeg, Manitoba, clinic where abortions are performed, had her planned marriage in a Catholic parish peremptorily canceled by Archbishop Adam Exner two weeks before the event, even though the archbishop admitted he did not know whether Ms. Hilliard was formally responsible for any abortion
In June 1983, Lynn Hilliard, a
part - time nurse
in a Winnipeg, Manitoba, clinic where abortions are performed, had her planned marriage in a Catholic parish peremptorily canceled by Archbishop Adam Exner two weeks before the event, even though the archbishop admitted he did not know whether Ms. Hilliard was formally responsible for any abortion
in a Winnipeg, Manitoba, clinic where
abortions are performed, had her planned marriage
in a Catholic parish peremptorily canceled by Archbishop Adam Exner two weeks before the event, even though the archbishop admitted he did not know whether Ms. Hilliard was formally responsible for any abortion
in a Catholic parish peremptorily canceled by Archbishop Adam Exner two weeks before the event, even though the archbishop admitted he did not know whether Ms. Hilliard was formally responsible for any
abortions.
Portraying the individual choice to abort
in this way, as a step toward freedom for the entire human race, invites women to see the sorrow they feel about their own
abortions as
part of a false consciousness instilled by a society determined to repress female sexuality.
Liberals for the most
part have shrunk from facing the ethical consequences of their embrace of
abortion, which results
in the annihilation of concrete individuals and not just clumps of insensate tissue.
The properly doctrinal
part of EV comes
in the third chapter, and especially
in the three italicized statements within that chapter,
in which the Pope condemns the taking of innocent human life,
abortion, and euthanasia.
What about all the other institutions that aren't «religious institutions»
in the narrow sense, but are staffed by human beings (yes, even profit - making businesses are staffed by human beings) who are now required by federal law to become
part of the
abortion industry?
Ziegler writes: «[F] or the better
part of a decade after the Court's decision, the vast majority of lawyers, law professors, and grassroots activists
in the antiabortion movement opposed efforts to strip the Court of its authority or to return the
abortion question to democratic politics....
No, REALLY pro-life, eschewing
abortion (
in part by advocating contraception), executions, non-defensive wars, torture, pollution, violence, poverty.
She revealed
in her book that
abortion «broke» her and wrote: «Abortion would now forever be a part of
abortion «broke» her and wrote: «
Abortion would now forever be a part of
Abortion would now forever be a
part of my life.
«Certainly, experiencing feelings of guilt or regret
in the short - term after an
abortion is not a mental health problem;
in fact, such emotions are a normal
part of making a life decision that many women
in this study found to be difficult,» the study said.
It is time for Ireland to move its maternity services into line with the WHO guidelines for the provision of safe
abortion services as
part of Primary Healthcare and for the government to realise that pregnant people must have the final say
in what happens to their bodies.
Part of the difficulty with creating a new understanding of adoption - including the women who chose it, the families who adopt, and the children who are adopted - is combating archaic adoption practices that not only reinforce negative stereotypes, but also do an incredible disservice to what adoption can be - that is, adoption is a legitimate pregnancy option for all women faced with a pregnancy decision, regardless of whether they identify as «pro-life» or «pro-choice,» religious or not, conservative or liberal... In the face of a pregnancy decision, the women who choose adoption feel no more part of the political discussion around it then the women who choose abortion feel about the political rhetoric characterizing their decis
Part of the difficulty with creating a new understanding of adoption - including the women who chose it, the families who adopt, and the children who are adopted - is combating archaic adoption practices that not only reinforce negative stereotypes, but also do an incredible disservice to what adoption can be - that is, adoption is a legitimate pregnancy option for all women faced with a pregnancy decision, regardless of whether they identify as «pro-life» or «pro-choice,» religious or not, conservative or liberal...
In the face of a pregnancy decision, the women who choose adoption feel no more
part of the political discussion around it then the women who choose abortion feel about the political rhetoric characterizing their decis
part of the political discussion around it then the women who choose
abortion feel about the political rhetoric characterizing their decision.
Lack of a secure attachment
in the first three years can not be easily corrected later, and it can be partly responsible
part for all kinds of problems, from depression and bi-polar disorder to unhealthy choices
in mates, inability to parent, even to poor sexual choices and
abortion decisions, and difficulty experiencing intimacy with God.
«MSI is also calling for healthcare professionals to provide women with comprehensive contraceptive information and access to the full range of modern methods via dedicated client consultations, and for more investment
in training for healthcare professionals
in fitting long acting reversible contraceptive methods (LARCs), which are a critical
part of the Government's strategy to reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and
abortions in the UK.»
Former Council Speaker Christine Quinn, a leader of the WEQ — an effort created at least
in part as a Cuomo campaign tactic to highlight the Westchester county executive's socially conservative views — said she would be delivering the pledge to Mr. Astorino this afternoon, putting him
in the position of likely rejecting a promise to pass legislation that would strengthen pay equity and
abortion laws.
The agenda, introduced as
part of Cuomo's State of the State address, also includes a strengthening of the state's
abortion laws by codifying the Roe v. Wade decision
in state law.
Cuomo, to chants of «four more years», promised to deliver
in his next term on a mostly progressive agenda, including enacting a number of items that were stalled
in the State Senate over the past couple of years, like an
abortion rights provision as
part of a women's rights agenda and public financing of political campaigns.