Sentences with phrase «parties appear in court»

6.0 Parties appear in court at case management meeting.

6.5 Parties appear in court on trial date.

The parties appeared in court Friday to hear the motion.

This would, in turn, reduce the number of unrepresented parties appearing in court.

Not exact matches

Lawyers for Ailes and Carlson appeared in court in New Jersey as a federal judge sought to plot the course of the lawsuit in the wake of «rapid fire» motions from the parties, include Carlson's motion to block Ailes» attorneys» request for arbitration.

5 Although the court did not address private enforcement, it is worth noting that it does not appear that a private party could bring a claim under the CEA for fraud or manipulation in connection with the purchase or sale of virtual currencies.

Spokesperson Paul Afoko, Nana Yaw Osei, has said his boss» case against the party would not be weakened merely because, Kwabena Agyepong, failed to appear in court as a witness.

The former National Security Adviser (NSA) Colonel Mohammed Sambo Dasuki (rtd) who is being unlawfully detained against court orders by Department of State Service (DSS) has approached the Court of Appeal Abuja Division praying the court to set aside the subpoena issued against him by the federal high court to appear before it to testify in a N400m corruption charges brought against Former National Publicity Secretary of the People's Democratic Party (PDP) Mr. Olisa Mcourt orders by Department of State Service (DSS) has approached the Court of Appeal Abuja Division praying the court to set aside the subpoena issued against him by the federal high court to appear before it to testify in a N400m corruption charges brought against Former National Publicity Secretary of the People's Democratic Party (PDP) Mr. Olisa MCourt of Appeal Abuja Division praying the court to set aside the subpoena issued against him by the federal high court to appear before it to testify in a N400m corruption charges brought against Former National Publicity Secretary of the People's Democratic Party (PDP) Mr. Olisa Mcourt to set aside the subpoena issued against him by the federal high court to appear before it to testify in a N400m corruption charges brought against Former National Publicity Secretary of the People's Democratic Party (PDP) Mr. Olisa Mcourt to appear before it to testify in a N400m corruption charges brought against Former National Publicity Secretary of the People's Democratic Party (PDP) Mr. Olisa Metuh.

Democratic State Senate candidate Adam Haber won a write - in ballot effort to appear under the Green Party line come Nov. 4th, according to Nassau election officials, but party members are vowing to appeal the results in cParty line come Nov. 4th, according to Nassau election officials, but party members are vowing to appeal the results in cparty members are vowing to appeal the results in court.

Lems and other Nassau Green Party members have filed an appeal and are scheduled to appear in Nassau State Supreme Court in Mineola on Sept. 29.

The Daily News reported last year Biaggi had been courted by mainline Democratic lawmakers in the Senate to run for the seat, but that appears to have been before state party leaders and the factions in the Senate agreed to a unity deal.

Governor Ayodele Fayose of Ekiti State, on Friday, challenged President Muhammadu Buhari to direct the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to charge the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) National Publicity Secretary, Chief Olisa Metuh to court if the commission was sure of evidences of fraud against him, saying «the EFCC appears to be operating a system in which an accused person is first arrested, detained endlessly while the anti-corruption agency goes about looking for evidence.»

Long Island state Senate candidate Adam Haber won a write - in ballot effort to appear under the Green Party line in November, but party members are vowing to appeal the results in cParty line in November, but party members are vowing to appeal the results in cparty members are vowing to appeal the results in court.

Some seven supporters of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), suspected to have played various roles in the incident, have already been remanded into prison custody after appearing before a Wa Magistrate Court.

The former National Security Adviser, Colonel Sambo Dasuki has appeared before Federal High Court in Abuja in line with the subpoena issued to him by the court to give evidence in the trial of former National Publicity Secretary of the People Democratic Party (PDP) Mer Olisah Metuh on N400 million corruption chaCourt in Abuja in line with the subpoena issued to him by the court to give evidence in the trial of former National Publicity Secretary of the People Democratic Party (PDP) Mer Olisah Metuh on N400 million corruption chacourt to give evidence in the trial of former National Publicity Secretary of the People Democratic Party (PDP) Mer Olisah Metuh on N400 million corruption charges.

The Ali Modu Sheriff - faction of the national leadership of the Peoples Democratic Party is to appear before a Federal High Court in Abuja on Thursday (today) to argue its application for an interlocutory injunction seeking to stop the party from going ahead with its planned national convention scheduled to hold on AugusParty is to appear before a Federal High Court in Abuja on Thursday (today) to argue its application for an interlocutory injunction seeking to stop the party from going ahead with its planned national convention scheduled to hold on Augusparty from going ahead with its planned national convention scheduled to hold on August 17.

It shall be a routine use of records in this system to disclose them in proceedings before any court or adjudicative or administrative body before which DOT or any agency thereof, appears, when (a) DOT, or any agency thereof, or (b) Any employee of DOT or any agency thereof (including a member of the Coast Guard) in his / her official capacity, or (c) Any employee of DOT or any agency thereof (including a member of the Coast Guard) in his / her individual capacity where DOT has agreed to represent the employee, or (d) The United States or any agency thereof, where DOT determines that the proceeding is likely to affect the United States, is a party to the proceeding or has an interest in such proceeding, and DOT determines that use of such records is relevant and necessary in the proceeding, provided, however, that in each case, DOT determines that disclosure of the records in the proceeding is a use of the information contained in the records that is compatible with the purpose for which the records were collected.

You may also be requested to appear in court or at a deposition per the request of the litigating party or your own carrier.

If the other party files for a judgment with the court, and you didn't appear and mount a defense, a summary judgment would have been entered in favor of vendor.

The Fanatic is a boss that wanders throughout The Crimson Court, and has a slight chance of appearing whenever you enter a dungeon with cursed heroes in your party.

[First category:] Characteristics such as race, caste, noble birth, membership of a political party and gender, are seldom, if ever, acceptable grounds for differences in treatment... But [second category:] the Strasbourg court has given it a wide interpretation [to Art 14], approaching that of the 14th Amendment, and it is therefore necessary, as in the United States, to distinguish between those grounds of discrimination which prima facie appear to off end our notions of the respect due to the individual and those which merely require some rational justification.»

Still, when I learned that Lilly Ledbetter, a retired Goodyear worker and petitioner in Ledbetter v. Goodyear will address the convention tonight, I could only ask, «Where else but in America does an ordinary person have the chance to appear before both the Supreme Court and a national party convention?»

An individual who appears in active litigation before the courts without the assistance for the representation by advocate (the Scottish term for barrister), and wherein the party litigant would, then, conduct the litigation by himself or herself, including the research and expressions of the law, procedures, forms, delays, and submissions.

After papers are filed, the court sets a hearing for the party to appear and show cause as to why they should not be held in contempt.

The seemingly immortal Hartshorne case is once more in the forefront, with the parties appearing before the B.C. Court of Appeal and (hopefully) finally resolving all of the issues arising from their ill fated 1989 marriage agreement.

For example, a casual perusal of the online legal research service Westlaw reveals that «mumbo jumbo» appears at least 251 times in judicial opinions.8 «Jibber - jabber» shows up just seven times (although surprisingly used by parties, rather than in statements from the court), while the more prosaic «gobbledygook» has 126 hits in the legal database.9 Believed to have been coined in 1944 by U.S. Rep. Maury Maverick of Texas, «gobbledygook» has been used by everyone from political figures referring to bureaucratic doublespeak (for example, President Ronald Reagan's stinging 1985 indictment of tax law revisions as «cluttered with gobbledygook and loopholes designed for those with the power and influence to have high - priced legal and tax advisers») to judges decrying the indecipherable arguments and pleadings of the lawyers practicing before them.

Given the negotiation parties» desire to establish legal certainty, consistency and transparency for the roughly 5 million affected citizens and the prospect of an unprecedented bureaucratic operation, the Court missed an opportunity to clarify what kind of residence actually qualifies as «legal» residence for the purpose of acquiring permanent residence under Article 16 of the Citizens Directive: is this any period of non-reliance on the social assistance system (as AG Wathelet appears to suggest) or only periods in which applicants can demonstrate compliance with certain minimum thresholds for «work» or «sufficient resources» (as Member States seem to prefer)?

While the action for damages had been initially conceived to protect those having a subjective right to be enforced before national courts, a reasonable solution in the present situation could be that the party who had drawn a benefit from the implementing act contrary to EU law now would be required to carry the burden of undertaking the necessary steps of an action for damages against the Member State; this would appear more justified than to impose said burden on the party who possesses a right created through the concretisation of the content of a principle (para 79).

Having the same judge hear both motions encourages both parties to be credible in their initial temporary hearing submissions, as they are more likely to lose credibility with the court if they must appear before the same judge to whom they previously provided inaccurate information.

The difficulties for the parties begin when one or both of them first appear in court.

The Institute will «provide pro bono, non-partisan advocacy advice to parties appearing in an appeal before the Supreme Court of Canada».

«The panel finds that Justice Matlow participated in controversial political discussions, inappropriately used the privileged platform of judicial office, publicly offered legal advice and criticism, took a role in litigation that was likely to come before his court, communicated with the press in the course of advancing a specific point of view in a legal and political dispute against a party that was imminently to appear before him in litigation, and failed to ensure that his actions and the extent of his involvement in the dispute with that party were disclosed to his co-panelists [on Divisional Court] and to the parties,» said the pcourt, communicated with the press in the course of advancing a specific point of view in a legal and political dispute against a party that was imminently to appear before him in litigation, and failed to ensure that his actions and the extent of his involvement in the dispute with that party were disclosed to his co-panelists [on Divisional Court] and to the parties,» said the pCourt] and to the parties,» said the panel.

ICBC has a statutory monopoly on third party automobile liability insurance coverage in BC and appears to be manipulating this monopoly in ominous new ways, testing our courts sense of justice.

He has represented insurers, in both first and third party claims, appearing before all levels of court in Ontario and various administrative tribunals, including the Financial Services Commission of Ontario, and he has trial, appellate and mediation experience.

The defendant crossappealed against a finding that the court had jurisdiction to grant declarations in a case where the parties before the court were not the parties to the contracts in which the terms appeared.

Furthermore, the Court stated that the customary rule on the territorial scope of treaties (cf Article 29 VCLT) provides that treaties are binding upon parties in respect of their «entire territory», unless a different intention appears from the treaty or is otherwise established.

The Justice of the Peace will set a court date and the other party will be served with a summons to appear in court.

Neither party will be required to appear in court.

If an individual named as a witness by either party is unwilling to appear in the court, the judge may issue a subpoena to make him or her appear in court.

Duty of justice (2) A justice who receives an information under subsection (1) shall cause the parties to appear before him or before a summary conviction court having jurisdiction in the same territorial division.

According to Barrie Hanson, Canadian courts have been asked to allow non-lawyer agents to appear for parties, but the exercise of this discretion, in jurisdictions where it exists, will been exercised rarely and with caution.

If, after defence filed, it appears from the record that a document relating to the issues between the parties is in the possession of a third party, he may, upon summons authorized by the court, be ordered to give communication of it to the parties, unless he shows cause why he should not do so.

If the parties in mediation are represented by attorneys, those attorneys can appear in contested court proceedings if the parties are unable to reach an agreement in mediation.

In addition, the Partridge case appears to be one of the few instances in which a court has ordered a party to pay compensation for breaching the Human Rights CodIn addition, the Partridge case appears to be one of the few instances in which a court has ordered a party to pay compensation for breaching the Human Rights Codin which a court has ordered a party to pay compensation for breaching the Human Rights Code.

For example, in my firm's family law practice, an enormous amount of time is needlessly wasted by lawyers, clients, and pro se parties traveling to and from court for hearings for no reason other than to appear in person before a judge — even when no oral testimony is provided.

In one case, the court appeared to say, there was no illegality or human rights - incompatibility with a procedure that dispensed with the requirement that all the material must be shown to both parties in every casIn one case, the court appeared to say, there was no illegality or human rights - incompatibility with a procedure that dispensed with the requirement that all the material must be shown to both parties in every casin every case.

The course of the court is where no motion is made by either party, on its own motion, to reverse such a judgment for want of jurisdiction, not only in cases where it is shown, negatively, by a plea to the jurisdiction that jurisdiction does not exist, but even where it does not appear, affirmatively that it does exist.

In the Circuit Courts of the United States, the record must show that the case is one in which, by the Constitution and laws of the United States, the court had jurisdiction — and if this does not appear, and the judgment must be reversed by this court — and the parties can not be consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the Circuit CourIn the Circuit Courts of the United States, the record must show that the case is one in which, by the Constitution and laws of the United States, the court had jurisdiction — and if this does not appear, and the judgment must be reversed by this court — and the parties can not be consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the Circuit Courin which, by the Constitution and laws of the United States, the court had jurisdiction — and if this does not appear, and the judgment must be reversed by this court — and the parties can not be consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the Circuit Ccourt had jurisdiction — and if this does not appear, and the judgment must be reversed by this court — and the parties can not be consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the Circuit Ccourt — and the parties can not be consent waive the objection to the jurisdiction of the Circuit CourtCourt.

The court also considered that the parties appeared to have proceeded on an equal basis since the agreement, which was different than the 2/3 to 1/3 split in the agreement:

This case has significant implication for the use of NPOs in international cases as, following this ruling, where a third party has not submitted itself to the jurisdiction of the English court, the applicability of NPOs in cross-jurisdictional matters appears to be limited.