Articles 5, 7 and 8 of the Kyoto Protocol address reporting and review of information by Annex
I Parties under the Protocol, as well as national systems and methodologies for the preparation of greenhouse gas inventories.
Provides information on the content and origin of the provisions of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety and the legal obligations of
the parties under the Protocol.
Not exact matches
Sellers may supply non-Quarantine and Pre-Shipment methyl bromide to a person who has a current critical use exemption approved by the
Parties to the Montreal
Protocol (an exempt person) only if the seller is listed as the nominated supplier for that exemption holder on the current non-Quarantine and Pre-Shipment Exemption List (and, if also required, the non-Quarantine and Pre-Shipment Intermediate Supplier List - see below)
under the Regulations.
Under the Montreal
Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, methyl bromide can only be used for a non-Quarantine and Pre-Shipment application if a critical use exemption has been approved by the
Parties to the Montreal
Protocol.
To address the shortage of oats grown
under a purity
protocol, I would answer that with a question... If General Mills could purchase 3rd
party certified gluten - free oats from the farm, would they buy them if the volume needed was available?
If the
party in question wins a majority (so that the unelected leader would ordinarily become PM), is there any
protocol that determines how a Prime Minister would be chosen
under these circumstances?
Countries that are
party to the 1997 Kyoto
protocol will continue to discuss a post-2012 commitment period; negotiators on a second track that includes the United States, which is not
party to Kyoto, will continue
under the main UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Thanks to a «quantum ATM» system
under development at HP Labs in Bristol, UK, this is now all it will take for two
parties to share a secret string of bits via a quantum key distribution (QKD)
protocol.
In Durban, the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action (ADP) was established to develop a
protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force
under the Convention, applicable to all
Parties.
Reporting is done by
Parties by submitting annual emission inventories and national reports
under the
Protocol at regular intervals.
In January 2013, a joint German - South African inspection of Princess Elisabeth Antarctica [5],
under the Antarctic Treaty and
Protocol on Environmental Protection, commended to all
Parties to the Treaty the station's energy and waste management systems, and commented on the «excellent science is undertaken by internationally staffed expeditions that do field work» around the station.
The purpose of the ADP in the next week is to consolidate a document that the
parties can adopt, as a
protocol or other legal instrument,
under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Annual report on the technical review of greenhouse gas inventories and other information reported by
Parties included in Annex I to the Convention that are also
Parties to the Kyoto
Protocol under Article 7, paragraph 1, of the Kyoto
Protocol
These include a 2nd commitment period of the Kyoto
Protocol (KP), and comparable mitigation actions by developed countries for non-KP
parties under the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long Term Cooperative Action (AWG - LCA) and Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) from developing countries with support from means of implementation, these are finance and technology transfer.
Countries that are not
Parties to the Kyoto
Protocol are not eligible to participate in emissions trading
under it.
Phase 2 KP - Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex 1
Parties under the Kyoto
Protocol (AWG - KP).
The Climate Change Conference of
Parties under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and its Kyoto
Protocol was held in Lima (Peru) this year.
The mandate of the ADP is to develop a
protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force
under the Convention applicable to all
Parties, which is to be completed no later than 2015 in order for it to be adopted at the twenty - first session of the Conference of the
Parties (COP) and for it to come into effect and be implemented from 2020.
Parties further requested the ADP to intensify its work, with a view to making available a negotiating text for a
protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force
under the Convention applicable to all
Parties before May 2015.
Voluntary submission of supplementary information
under Article 7, paragraph 1, of the Kyoto
Protocol by Annex I Kyoto
Protocol Parties is reflected in the last column of the table below.
Through the same decision,
Parties requested the secretariat to communicate the negotiating text to
Parties in accordance with provisions of the Convention and the applied rules of procedure, while noting that such communication will not prejudice whether the outcome will be a
protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force
under the Convention applicable to all
Parties.
This technical document synthesizes the information provided by
Parties and relevant organizations on the revision of the joint implementation (JI) guidelines, taking into consideration their experience of implementing the flexible mechanisms
under the Kyoto
Protocol and the recommendations on options for building on the approach embodied in JI.
The exact language is a feat of amazing creative ambiguity: the ADP is meant to conclude with «a
protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force
under the Convention applicable to all
Parties.»
The exact language in the decision (1 / CP.17) which mandated these talks is a feat of creative ambiguity: the ADP is meant to conclude with «a
protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force
under the Convention applicable to all
Parties.»
In the morning, the opening plenary of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I
Parties under the Kyoto
Protocol (AWG - KP) took place.
At climate negotiations at COP - 13 in Bali, Indonesia in 2007,
parties to the UNFCCC agreed to replace the Kyoto
Protocol with an agreement that would create a second commitment period
under the UNFCCC and would include binding emissions reductions for developed countries and new programs on adaptation for developing countries, deforestation, finance, technology transfer, and capacity building.
-- If the United States becomes a
party or otherwise adheres to a multilateral agreement, including any amendment to the Montreal
Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer, which restricts the production or consumption of class II, group II substances, the Administrator may utilize funds to meet any related contribution obligation of the United States to the Multilateral Fund for the Implementation of the Montreal
Protocol or similar multilateral fund established
under such multilateral agreement.
Under the Kyoto
Protocol,
Parties shall annually report emissions by sources and removals by sinks of CO2 and other greenhouse gases resulting from:
Unlike the Convention, which includes all emissions and removals from LULUCF in a
Party total emissions, the Kyoto
Protocol restricts the accounting of the LULUCF sector to emissions and removals from specific activities that are defined
under Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4, of the
Protocol.
During these COPs
Parties finalized the remaining work of the guidelines
under Articles 5, 7 and 8 of the Kyoto
Protocol.
For the first commitment period decision 15 / CMP.1 Guidelines for the preparation of the information required
under Article 7 of the Kyoto
Protocol stipulates that each
Party included in Annex I shall include in its annual greenhouse gas inventory information on anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions by sources and removals by sinks from land use, land - use change and forestry activities
under Article 3, paragraph 3, and, if any, elected activities
under Article 3, paragraph 4, in accordance with Article 5, paragraph 2, as elaborated by any good practice guidance in accordance with relevant decisions of the COP / MOP on land use, land - use change and forestry.
Parties also have to report annually, supplementary information related to LULUCF
under the provisions of the Kyoto
Protocol and the Marrakesh Accords to ensure compliance with their commitments.
Moreover, data reported by Annex B
Parties under the Kyoto
Protocol for the first commitment period as of 17 February 2015 are accessible through the links below:
In a nutshell,
parties «decided to launch a process to develop a protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force under the Convention applicable to all Parties» to be agreed on by all parties in 2015 and come into force b
parties «decided to launch a process to develop a
protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force
under the Convention applicable to all
Parties» to be agreed on by all parties in 2015 and come into force b
Parties» to be agreed on by all
parties in 2015 and come into force b
parties in 2015 and come into force by 2020.
In addition, for those
parties who are not
party to the Kyoto
Protocol or would not abide by that treaty, also have a responsibility to ensure comparability of their targets and actions
under the AWG - LCA.
With a view to ensure that mitigation ambition
under the DP is closely linked to work of
parties under the two other groups - namely LCA and KP, we would like to propose the inclusion of the following footnote in the agenda: The implementation of Decision 1 / CP.17 should be examined on the basis of its compliance with International Law, in accordance with the principle of pacta sunt servanda and, in particular, with the exception on non-performance related to the full respect and compliance with the UNFCCC and its Kyoto Protocol, for the Parties that are Parties of those instr
parties under the two other groups - namely LCA and KP, we would like to propose the inclusion of the following footnote in the agenda: The implementation of Decision 1 / CP.17 should be examined on the basis of its compliance with International Law, in accordance with the principle of pacta sunt servanda and, in particular, with the exception on non-performance related to the full respect and compliance with the UNFCCC and its Kyoto
Protocol, for the
Parties that are Parties of those instr
Parties that are
Parties of those instr
Parties of those instruments.
For a while now, the EU has been busy pushing a COP decision at Warsaw that will urge
Parties to begin this exact same process
under the Montreal
Protocol, and they are clearly excited to have China and the US in agreement.
UNFCCC data
under the Kyoto
Protocol in individual Annex I
Parties that are
Parties to the Kyoto
Protocol
At the COP - 13 negotiations in Bali, Indonesia in 2007,
parties to the UNFCCC agreed to replace the Kyoto
Protocol with an agreement that would create a second commitment period
under the UNFCCC and would include binding emissions reductions for developed countries and new programs on adaptation for developing countries, deforestation, finance, technology transfer, and capacity building.
«The introduction of environmentally friendly solutions will allow the
Parties to comply with the downstream obligations
under the Montreal
Protocol.»
In accordance with Kyoto
Protocol requirements,
Parties launched negotiations on the next phase of the KP
under the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I
Parties under the Kyoto
Protocol (AWG - KP).
While some
Parties are making more progress in cutting emissions than others, what unsettles us the most is that not a single developed country has indicated their intention to increase their targets for 2020, neither those countries that remain
under the Kyoto
Protocol or, even worse, from those who have stepped outside (or were never in).
For the purpose of fulfilling commitments
under Article 3, paragraph 1, of the Kyoto
Protocol, a
Party may, until the 100th day after the date set by the Conference of the
Parties serving as the meeting of the
Parties to the Kyoto
Protocol (CMP) for the completion of the expert review process
under Article 8 of the
Protocol for the last year of the commitment period, continue to acquire, and other
Parties may transfer to such
Party, emission reduction units, certified emission reductions, assigned amount units and removal units
under Articles 6, 12 and 17 of the
Protocol, from the preceding commitment period, provided the eligibility of any such
Party has not been suspended in accordance with decision 27 / CMP.1, annex, section XV, paragraph 4.
This would have been a significant first step, yet the agreement instantly came
under attack from the fossil - fuel lobby in the United States and Australia, and the recalcitrant
parties managed to insert so many loopholes in the
protocol that, after several international meetings culminating in a conference in Marrakech in 2001, it would, if implemented, result in minimal reductions in the rich countries» greenhouse gas emissions.
It was established in 2011 with the mandate to develop a «
protocol, another legal instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force»
under the Convention applicable to all
Parties, which is to be completed no later than 2015 and to come into effect in 2020.
The report features sections on, inter alia: the overview of information reported by
parties; capacity building activities
under the Kyoto
Protocol; and capacity building activities [continue reading...]
In the preamble of the Accord, the ongoing work of both the Ad hoc working group on Long - term Cooperative Action (AWG - LCA), and the Ad hoc working group on Further Commitments of Annex I
Parties under the Kyoto
Protocol (AWG - KP) are recognized.
The timely submission of the «true - up period reports»
under the first commitment period is an essential step for initializing the assessment of the compliance of a
Party with its commitment
under Article 3, paragraph 1 of the Kyoto
Protocol.
Annual compilation and accounting report for Annex B
Parties under the Kyoto
Protocol for 2015.
•
Under the Montreal
Protocol, all 197
Parties have accepted firm reduction commitments.