Sentences with phrase «pay losing side»

When the winner has to pay the losing side's legal expenses.

Kelly Santini LLP's Employment Law Blog for the Suddenly Unemployed Judge Says Winner Has to Pay Losing Side's Legal Costs When is a win not a win?

In a recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court in Ottawa, Goulding v. Street Motor Sales, 2013 ONSC 1904 (CanLII), the Honourable Justice Robert N. Beaudoin held that notwithstanding the plaintiff's success in his wrongful dismissal case, because he brought the case in the wrong court, he would have to pay the losing side's costs.

Not exact matches

Prominent, my gills, she was a nobody with no information for Atheism, so she figured a bunch of Christian radicals would put her on a pedestal, as their token Reformed - Atheist, and somebody would finally pay attention to her, so she went to the losing side.

One of the most exciting aspects of contract bridge is the competitive auction in which each player tries to determine the price he can afford to pay for the privilege of naming the trump suit or the declaration at which his side will gain the most points or lose the fewest.

While Remi Garde will have been pleased with their showing before the break, the Premier League side began to lose their way in the second half and were almost made to pay.

I can only hope that this attempt is taken more seriously than the largely muted and clearly unsuccessful protests of late last season... although the plane writing escapade brought some much - needed attention to the matter, it failed to resonate with fence - sitters and those who had just recently fell off the Wenger truck... without a big enough showing of support the whole endeavor appeared relatively weak and poorly organized, especially to the major media outlets, whose involvement could have significantly changed what was to follow... but I get it, few wanted to turn on their club, let alone make a public display of their discord... problem is, they are preying on that vulnerability, in fact, their counting on you to keep your thoughts to yourself... who are you to tell these fat cats how to steal your money... they have worked long and hard to pull the wool over your eyes... they even went so far as to pay enormous sums of cash to your once beloved professor to be their corporate spokesmodel so that the whole thing would be more palatable... eventually the club made it appear as if this was simply a relatively small fringe group of highly radicalized supporters, which allowed the pro-Wenger element inside the club hierarchy to claim victory following the FA Cup win... unfortunately what has happened to this club can't be solved by FA Cups or a few players coming in, the very culture of this club needs to be changed and that starts at the top... in order to change the unhealthy and dysfunctional narrative that has absorbed this club we need to remove everyone who presently occupies a position of power... only then can we get back to the business of playing championship caliber football, which should always be the number one priority of this organization... on an important side note, one of the most devastating mistakes made in the final days of this hectic and poorly planned transfer window didn't have to do with the big name players like Sanchez or Lemar, but the fact that they failed to secure Jadon Sancho, who might even start for Dortmund this season... I think they might seriously regret this oversight... instead of spending so much time, energy and manpower pretending that they were desperately trying to make big moves, they once again lost the plot due to their all too familiar tunnel vision

The Liberty Stadium side paid a club record # 13m for Bony last summer, with the former Vitesse Arnhem man smashing in 25 goals in his debut campaign, and having seem Michu, Michel Vorm and Ben Davies leave over the summer one can see why boss Garry Monk would not be looking to lose the powerful marksman.

Despite a 4 - 0 win over Levante, the side have lost four of their last five matches, and as a consequence, Moyes has paid the price with his job.

Its hard to believe that manu lost 6 - 1 to man city, take nothing away from man city but every club uses manu as a measuring stick to compare themselves too, I really wish it was arsenal that gave that drubbing, I remember not long ago I was watching arsenal lose to manu by that you know what scoreline and my father (a manu fan) walk away, when it was 3 something becoz he couldn't watch a far one sided match, so I guess he is feeling what we are feeling that day, manu is always a side that neva lose by a huge margin no matter what, but tell you da truth I don't like man city becoz I do nt like a side that will spend and replace every single player and still have classy players on the bench, they can say that we won that and this but that becoz of the huge wages that we are paid, I just don't like football to be won by having money to spend there should be a mixture of everything good, middle and work in progress players.

Arsene Wenger risked fielding a weakened side and paid the price, losing in the Third Round for the first time ever in charge of the Gunners.

Now officials from both governing bodies have made some changes to the proposal, including forcing the Park District to show its projects won't burden neighbors and requiring the losing party to pay the winning side's legal fees if both end up in court.

We probably lost money on the investment side of the 401K by having less in the retirement account, but I'm certain we probably gained in the long run by paying off credit cards that were at 20 % interest or more!

On the flip side, by using the cash to pay down debt you lose liquidity; i.e., the ability to do something else with the cash.

On the flip side of the equation, someone who paid $ 5,000 in property taxes and qualified for a $ 2,000 mortgage interest deduction would actually lose $ 3,000 a year.

Also as a side note, as long as the companies dividends stay (on average between them all) above 4.5 % which is the interest I am paying on my LOC, then I wont be losing any money correct?

If your investments lose 20 %, you'll find yourself on the hook for paying back $ 100,000 while the other side of your balance sheet has an $ 80,000 asset that has to overcome the double hurdles of interest payments and high fees.

Often, those are laws that allow for something called «fee shifting,» where the losing side is legally required pay for the winner's attorneys fees.

If you lose a small claim it's rare to have to pay the other sides costs although a judge could decide you need to pay for a limited amount of their expenses.

My name is Harold Wilson I am here to testify about the good works of Perry Morgan Loan company a reliable loan company who help me in getting a loan of 60,000.00 dollars, i was into a debt for over 5 years, i was unable to meet up with the repayment of the debt i went to severer banks here in Bellingham, Washington USA but they refuse to grant me the loan saying that my bank draft is too low to apply for any amount of loan, i was very confuse because i could not meet up with the repayment of my debt, i got an email that they will come and take my house since i could not meet up with the debt repayment because when i borrow the money i use my house as a collateral, the year was almost coming to an end, the grace period i was given was November 2nd i don't want to lose my house and keep my family out side, a friend of my introduce me to one of the online reliable loan lending company who also help him in getting a loan the name of the loan company is called Perry Morgan Loan Firm, i emailed them and apply for a loan of 60,000.00 dollars they gave me some procedure which i followed could you believe the loan was credit into my bank account after 48 hours, do you need a loan, are you into debt and you don't know how to pay back contact the loan company now they can help you with any amount of loan at a low interest rate, contact them now via email: [email protected] for more info.

If you are one of the cardholders contributing to that massive amount and paying hundreds of dollars in interest each year to carry a balance, I'll cut to the chase: You are probably coming out on the losing side of the credit card rewards game.

PS + edition to release along side release of game in October 2014, PS + Edition announce date to come... so three times and you lost count The PS + edition was delayed due to server issues, once in production and people have paid for pre-orders Sony can't pull the full version or stop it hitting retail as the issues were in launch week, they did have the power to make sure millions of others did not download it and cause even more issues.

In it to love this paid what's a the issue side lost or at 25 cheap cialis online canadian pharmacy said they is people me.

The government has dropped Lord Leveson's controversial proposal to make newspapers pay both sides» legal costs for libel actions, whether they won or lost in court.

This meant that, even if the claimant lost their claim, they only need to pay # 5,000 in costs to the other side, or # 10,000 where the claimant was an organisation.

If you lose your judicial review you could have to pay the other side's court costs.

Fay Copeland, head of City law firm Wedlake Bell's contentious trust and probate team, is quoted (The Observer, 30 November 2008) as saying: «Going to court can cost as much as # 150,000 — with the risk that if you lose you may have to pay the winning side's costs as well.

Legal expense insurance may cover you for the risk of losing and having to pay the other side's costs or cover you for your own costs, but not the risk of losing and having to pay the other side's costs, or both your own costs and the other sides costs if you lose.

In the event that the claim is successful, then a solicitor is also likely to be paid a fee from the losing side.

The order may specify a limit on the amount that a claimant can be ordered to pay in respect of the other side's cost if the claimant loses (e.g..

In addition, if the arbitrator, at the request of the winning party, finds that the losing party brought a claim or asserted a defense frivolously or for an improper purpose, then regardless of the amount in dispute, the arbitrator must order the losing party to pay both sides» arbitration fees and may order the losing party to pay the winning party's reasonable attorneys» fees, unless such an award of fees is prohibited by applicable law.

Parties, moving swiftly toward trial, may decide at a one - day mediation, whether that mediation is mandatory or voluntary, that they do not wish to incur any or all of the following: the inherent risk of trial, the lack of finality (since the trials can lead to appeals), the publicity of open court proceedings, the prospect of having to pay the other side's legal costs if they lose, stress, and the further fracture of relationships.

But, hang on, why don't we take our human rights case first time out to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, particularly as we have ben told that we don't have to pay anything to the other side if we lose (not something which usually happens in the domestic courts)?

The general rule in an employment tribunal is that each side pays their own legal fees regardless of whether they win or lose.

Regardless of how your injury happens, or where it happens, the expert personal injury attorneys at Altman & Altman LLP have over 50 years of experience fighting for our clients who need someone on their side to ensure that they receive necessary compensation to be able to pay their medical expenses and compensate for lost wages from being unable to work.

In Canada, the losing side of a dispute will be asked to pay legal costs to the winning side, which can typically include lawyer's fees and disbursements.

«The costs are still far higher in the UK than the US because here you pay the other side's costs if you lose, which means that funders will not get involved in frivolous claims.

In short this means that the losing party generally has to pay the winning sides costs.

England and many other European countries have what's termed a «loser pays» policy, whereby whomever is on the losing side of a legal action has to pay the legal fees of the prevailing party.

Maybe more facts of the case would make it sound more plausible, but for a case that would cost perhaps $ 75,000 of attorneys» fees and costs to litigate in the U.S. with no prospect of an award of those fees to you if you prevailed in the U.S. (except recovery of your filing fees, out of pocket costs and expert witness fees for things other than attorneys), and a risk of paying the other side's expert witness costs if you lost, the provable harm would have to be in the many hundreds of thousands of dollars and the mistake would have to be very glaring before that kind of case would make sense to seriously consider bringing.

However, the amendments incorporated restrictions such as a cap on damages and rules that required the losing side to pay the legal fees and expenses of the winning side, to discourage a tumultuous increase in suits similar to what has happened in the U.S..

The cost of EPLI insurance is a fraction of what you will pay if you end up on the losing side in a lawsuit.

Since patent trolls often use the high costs of litigation to pressure their targets into settlements, a likelihood that the losing party (which, in cases litigated all the way to a final judgment, is most often the troll) will pay the other side's fees could put a serious damper on trolls filing lawsuits in the first place.

Require that a losing party who brings a frivolous case pay the other side's attorney's fees — and make sure the troll can pay.

Under the Act, if the patent troll loses in court (because the patent is found to be invalid or there is no infringement), then it pays the other side's costs and legal fees.

Under the Act, if a patent troll loses in court because the patent is found to be invalid or there is no infringement, then the troll pays the other side's legal costs, which often reach into the millions of dollars.

Under this proposal, if the patent troll loses in court (because the patent is found to be invalid or there is no infringement), then it pays the other side's costs and legal fees.

However, this can be a disadvantage, such as when governments can not track funds easily, and risk losing on the tax side of the equation (which may, potentially, mean that the average taxpayer ends up paying more).

The bill creates a system where if a troll loses in court because the patent is found to be invalid or there is no infringement, then it pays the other side's costs and legal fees.