Sentences with phrase «people disagree on»

However, a healthy argument can be more like a discussion where two people disagree on an issue.

Though there isn't a «one size fits all» golden resume format, and though many people disagree on this subject, there are some very common steps to follow.

There are an infinite number of reasons why intelligent people disagree on CAGW.

Well people disagree on who are the trolls and hijackers.

People disagree on if you will be able to get the bonus for this card and then again for Ascend.

People disagree on if you will be able to...

People disagree on how much sugar is safe to eat each day.

This seductively simple strategy has drawbacks; in particular, people disagree on what exactly «consciously seeing» is if the face was only briefly flashed on a computer display screen.

Not so, science education: There, more or less everyone agrees on the ends; what people disagree on is the means.

«Because people disagree on the outcome of the grand jury does not mean you trash the whole thing,» the senator added.

The two statements can co-exist quite happily - that some people disagree on what religious truth might look like, doesn't therefore mean that there can never be such a thing as religious truth, and that a particular religion can't be the the most faithful expression of it.

But I've seen reasonable people disagree on this topic.

People disagree on how much sugar is safe to eat each day.

A weak case can be made for permitting abortions on the grounds that responsible people disagree on the matter.

Throughout history, people disagree on what Scripture actually teaches, and so doctrinal statements were written to serve as a guide for the proper interpretation and understanding of Scripture.

You have to read it in context... because the extremely educated kermit says so... and the best thing about it... is even though people disagree on the meaning... it's still perfectly clear...

This is because people disagree on the idea of God.

Interesting topic that I'm finding out a lot of «free grace» people disagree on.

People disagree on good and evil, not mainly out of ignorance nor because of the changefulness of the world, nor because perfection is beyond reach, but primarily because they are self - centered.

I have no doubt at all that people disagreed on the amendment.

Not exact matches

It's based on the writings of Carl Jung and categorizes people into one of 16 different four - letter types using a series of agree - or - disagree scenarios, such as, «you tend to be unbiased even if it might endanger your good relations with people» or «failing to complete your task on time makes you uncomfortable.»

«There's a tradition in America of people of principle when they are sufficiently offended and disagree with their president on matters fundamental resign,» he said.

If we connect with people about what we have in common — sports teams, TV shows, interests — it is easier to have dialogue about what we disagree on.

You're likely surrounded by people at work, on your commute, or at home who disagree with you and your beliefs.

«That means people having a voice, having leaders step down and being able to trust and respect everybody on the team enough that it's OK to disagree.»

He and other Facebook executives, such as Ms. Sandberg, disagreed early on over how proactive the social network should be in policing its own platform, said the people briefed on the matter.

It's named after a strategy which states: if nine people agree on a particular action or plan, then the tenth must disagree in order to stir up alternatives to be considered.

It is hard to assess value because people are disagreeing on whether this is a bubble or not.

«My suggestions to young filmmakers would be to embrace and trust your strange and unusual ideas, and to not be afraid of disagreeing with others and stepping on people's toes, because that will inevitably happen every day you have to make executive decisions.»

When you reply to posters with whom you disagree, it would be helpful to comment on the person's views or assumptions.

In that thread to Lymis people talked about how you never know who's reading or what impact your words will have when reflected on in years to come... Well, I * was * that person, and I read and listened quietly, and when I spoke and disagreed, I remembered later what was said in response.

What is interesting is doing this work in community, where other people might call you on stuff, or heaven forbid, disagree with you.»

Again, if you disagree with this, prove the only thing that makes gravity stick to a 9.8 constant is god keeping his finger on the button and back it up with evidence, or else you're just making baseless claims and still gettting angry at other people for backing up their claims with hard evidence when you can not.

Even though I was clearly conservative, and still am on many issues, I recognized that people of good conscience can and do disagree on many of these issues.

Hence, part of the reason of the concept of the «separation of church and the government... or church and the secular,» so, no religion including Christianity can stomp on the rights of people to express themselves fully and in their own way... whether you agree, disagree or don't have an opinion one way or another on others view and comments... yes...?

I disagree with a wide range of people on a wide range of topics.

To me I would rather have a friend who I respectfully disagreed with on a view, who I could still find approach and say «we differ on views, but that you are still a cool person but, once you finish you vigil, would you like to come volunteer and paint the school?»

It's one thing to disagree on fiscal or some social issues; it's another thing to look at gay people and say «that grosses me out; therefore, they shouldn't have the same rights as me».

We have spent hours in person and on the phone discussing our differences in our theology, and I have freely and frankly disagreed with him so many times we both have likely lost count.

People of integrity can disagree on precisely what policies are best, or are attainable, with respect to clearly moral questions in medicine and genetics.

«People are surely free to disagree with us on the facts,» Dale Jones, a church spokesman, wrote in an e-mail to CNN.

Atheists can't explain why in a situation with two people who disagree on morals, one person can be wrong, and one person can be right.

But Wesley himself was more impressed by the fact that people could disagree on many of these matters and yet commit themselves with equal fervor to the evangelical task.

Their conviction raises a very difficult issue, a thorny and uncomfortable problem: how to live with people with whom we disagree on basic issues of human life.

If both sides can agree on a common objective — to reduce the demand for abortions, maybe we can do something to make a difference in people's lives while we disagree over the larger issue.

If you take two people who disagree with each other on a fundamental level, and stick them in a room where they can't see or touch one another, they can only talk, and then give them nothing specific to talk about, there is only one direction that's going to go.

Besides, are you suggesting that we suppress anyone's right to free speech because if you are than you need to move to one of these bass ackward countries where a less than middle school quality production of a total farce can insight people to act as a pack of rabid dogs blaming America for why they live in dirt... We are LUCKY and BLESSED to live in a land where we can smile and walk away from an opinion that we disagree with... that South Park can but Jesus in a boxing ring against Satan and depict Moses as a glowing spinning dreidl... and these nutcases want to burn and pillage because one lunatic makes a childish and stupid play on videotape?

And why should I, as a faithful lay member of the Church, have to disagree with the Church as represented by its shepherds when I make judgments of fact and feasibility, judgments on which people of goodwill may disagree?

Most people who wrote me positive things about my blog had already a progressive theology and found some of my ideas useful while disagreeing with others, like I did on their blogs.

i hope people who disagree will think on it rather than rush to respond with the same reposts that are sadly familiar and all too quick to judge.