Sentences with phrase «people on each side claim»

Not exact matches

The group says that the legislation would, for example, allow an evangelical police officer to refuse to patrol a Jewish street festival or «an EMT could claim the law is on his side after refusing service to a dying transgender person in the street.»

Numerous people on both sides responded obliquely but did not answer, and a few on each side claimed to already possess knowledge of absolute truth.

How sad to claim to be a chaplain and not be able to tell a dying patient anything about the specifics on the other side of the veil; what will happen to a person who has died, what they will be doing, what is the exact nature of God and those who depart from this life.

People who are true Agnostics would sit squarely in the middle, so their belief claim shouldn't tilt either way (but it typically errs on the side of a god).

For any religious person to crow about having the majority on their side and worse to actually use this as justification for their religious claims is grossly ignorant and WRONG.

The US Department of Education has published the names of colleges claiming the Title IX exemption; people on both sides of the issue have called it an effort at «shaming.»

You can not put violent acts of rage and vengeance that killed millions of people, including innocent children, infants and babes in the womb on one side of a balance and then claim that the loving God presented by Jesus makes the sides equal.

Instead, people simply wanted to go to war, to annihilate their enemies, to set themselves up as ruler, or raise taxes, and so they claimed that God had given them a message, that God was on their side, and that God would fight for them in their «Holy War.»

On all sides of conversation between people who prefer one or another title for themselves, I hear claims that make sense to me as one Christian among many.

On each side of this great divide people claim to have a better account of how God is present in the world.

Hear me tllk and notice how soon people will come out on this side, and claim things like.

The Gunners travel across London to take on the Premier League champions tomorrow, and many people are writing off our chances of stopping Antonio Conte's side, but Murphy has gone a step further by claiming we are too naive to stop them.

He claimed 200,000 people have died in the past three years of fighting between black African rebel groups on one side, and government forces and the Janjaweed Arab militia on the other.

Even, improbably, Jeremy Corbyn has used it, telling his delirious fans in his leadership acceptance speech, «I want us to stand up and say «we want to live in a society where we don't pass by on the other side of those people rejected by an unfair welfare system»,» and motivating them again 18 months later at the start of the 2017 Election campaign by claiming, «we know that the people of Britain don't pass by on the other side.»

Slight quibble with «after a while people stopped caring about how true the claims were» and how that «was a considerable political victory by the strategists on the other side».

And he claimed the Conservative party did not just say it was on the side of hard - working people but showed it «day in, day out in the policies we deliver.»

Labour is on the «wrong side of working people and British business» the Conservative leader David Cameron claimed today - after another 14 business leaders endorsed the Tories» promise to scrap Labour's planned National Insurance increases.

«A lot of issues are divisive, but if you want to claim to be the healer, then you're not on the side of the person that's pushing those divisive issues... They do have freedom of religion.

But David Cameron has claimed that the autumn statement showed that the coalition was on the side of people working.

The calls for more armed officers in schools is one side of the many argued nationally about gun control in America following the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida on February 14 which claimed the lives of 17 people.

When your person is found to be on the right side of history you would want to claim ownership of him.

His current research seeks to document how people on either side of the controversy collect and use evidence about the claim that GMOs increase crop yields.

There are people who may not experience these effects after taking maca supplementation, though, and regard the benefits of maca root as nothing short of amazing and claim that the maca side effects are outweighed by the benefits including better skin, improved libido, alleviated anxiety, and so on.

The first thing we do is validate the identity to confirm that the person on the other side of the computer is who they claim to be.

Of course, people on every side of every education issue claim it is about the kids.

On the flip side plenty of people also said they love the fact Apple's iPhone 5 isn't too big, claiming some Android's are just too unwieldy.

Healthy Paws Pet Insurance may be the only insurance company that I've encountered where the people on the other side of the insurance claim actually care.

These same people claim to have the «best available science» on their side, but either can not or will not describe or discuss what exactly they've got in mind for a solution to the «feral cat problem.»)

Yet, these same people — who, ironically, claim to have the «best available science» on their side — either can not or will not describe or discuss what exactly they've got in mind for a solution to the «feral cat problem.»

Given that people on Brulle's side of the Global Warming / Climate Change argument have been making false claims for decades — for example, that New York and Washington would be under water by the year 20004 — and given that the mass media sound daily alarms about the climate threat, the statement in the National Research Council report that «some» information sources are «affected» by campaigns opposed to policies that would limit carbon dioxide emissions is scant foundation for believing a massive conspiracy exists.5

In conclusion, I think there might be a solution to the gridlock where educated people on both sides of the debate do nothing but pick away at the individual claims of the other side, both throwing around biased data sets.

The problem is that both sides tend to see a conspiracy both in the promotion of the results of science like this and in opposition to the research results which it is claimed is funded by commercial interests like the Donor fund and promulgated by the same tactics and often the same people that undermined the science on tobbaco, asbestos, DDT, CFCs, lead.....

You know that both of these claims are false, but you keep pumping the significance of the story, secure in the knowledge that most people on your side of politics are either too lazy or too ignorant to tell the difference.

For example, focusing only upon easy claims to agree with — «warmer than before», «big factor», and removing the quantitative element is more or less a rhetorical trick to try to push people toward a conclusion — on one «side» or another, as is the use of record breaking statistics for «shock value» or to seem «more compelling».

As to your suggestion that I re-do the «study», I find the whole point of the study to be political in nature, trying to prove a scientific point by some kind of opinion poll and then bragging all over the press that your opinions are right because you claim to have lots & lots of people on your side.

As a side note, claiming «fabrication» in a nefarious way doesn't help, and generally turns people off to open debate on the issue because the process of infilling missing data wasn't designed at the beginning to be have any nefarious motive; it was designed to make the monthly data usable when small data dropouts are seen, like we discussed in part 1 and showed the B - 91 form with missing data from volunteer data.

You might consider early on providing an operational definition of climate, then enumerating four or five claims made by those supporting AGW, making distinctions between those on the high and low sides and summarizing their evidence, including posting links where people can learn more.

It is completely legitimate to examine the credentials of people making public statements (on any side of any issue)-- especially if they make a claim to scientific expertise.

People who claimed to have the «settled science» on their «side» were wrong all along!

«I've spent almost 35 years trying to help those poor folk,» he writes, «and I have been frustrated daily by the actions of the people on the other side of the claims.»

What is also unique about this case is that the person identified as the RateMDs poster was involved in different lawsuit on the other side of Dr. Foda in Foda v. Capital Health Region, [2007] A.J. No. 22; 2007 ABQB 19, where he was making a claim for breach of contract, conspiracy, harassment, defamation, and direct interference with economic relations.

Having tried cases on both sides of the docket, Mr. Forteith has a tremendous insight into how insurance companies fight the claims of injured persons which helps clients maximize their recovery.

That process may include going to an arbitration of your claim, where each side presents arguments to an impartial third party and that person makes a ruling on the dispute.

On the civil side, that service generally involves counseling and representing indigent persons who have solid legal claims or defenses but lack the means to pursue them successfully.

The law will always be on the side of the police officer who claims that a person is not wearing a seat belt.

When it first unveiled a phone with a side - mounted fingerprint scanner, Sony defended its decision by claiming that this is the most convenient location because usually, people tend to hit the power button when turning their devices» display on and off.