Perhaps human languages alone simply aren't up to the task.
Not exact matches
Much of the effect can likely be explained by researchers unconsciously giving hints or suggestions to their
human or animal subjects,
perhaps in something as subtle as body
language or tone of voice.
Let us begin with
language,
perhaps the most fundamental of all studies because of the fact that speech is so clearly a distinguishing feature of
human beings within the whole created order and because it is so essential to the effective conduct of all
human affairs, including every aspect of education.
The electronic age with its offering of a wide variety of ways to present the
human voice has commanded new attention to oral
language.1
Perhaps the ascendancy of science and the domination of the scientific method has created such a restricted view of
language that a reaction in favor of more dimensions to
language is to be taken simply as clear testimony to a general degeneration of meaningful discourse, a degeneration in which the church figures prominently.
«This article
perhaps overreaches in its interpretations,» he says, because the subjects have grown up with
language but «they have not grown up with stone tools» as early
humans did.
In fact, it is a system years in the making, and
perhaps the most impressive attempt ever to create a question - answering computer that understands the nuances of
human language.
The results reveal important insights into the neural networks needed to understand speech, hinting that
perhaps both
humans and dogs may have relied on similar networks that were already in place before
language evolved, and later adapted to process speech.
April 26, 2006 «Uniquely
human» component of
language found in gregarious birds Although linguists have argued that certain patterns of
language organization are the exclusive province of
humans —
perhaps the only uniquely
human component of
language — researchers from the University of Chicago and the University of California San Diego have discovered the same capacity to recognize such patterns and distinguish between them in Sturnus vulgaris, the common European starling.
Perhaps it's something like Pensato's paintings — animal and «
human» personages anthropomorphized into the barest semblances of themselves, erased (to use Pensato's own
language), and re-represented, brutally, in the grammar of «high» art, with the painterly strokes and complex surfaces of abstract expressionism.
They give a viewer pause — to ponder the boundaries of
human fantasy, the degree to which nature is pristine, or
perhaps how both our
language for and concepts of nature are transformed by an intricate and inevitable interweaving with
human technology.
«the art of making knots, which is the peak of both mental abstraction and manual work, could be seen as the
human characteristic par excellence, just as much and
perhaps even more than
language...» Italo Calvino
Gatekeeper sculptures were
perhaps representative of a
human population reduced to base observations of the world around them, then these poems might be a key to their
language.
Upshot: Currently, businesses agree on deals in prose (
human language),
perhaps capturing it in a legal contract, and then independently write their own computer code to automate the logic.