Sentences with phrase «perhaps if the right»

Perhaps if the right deal comes along he may consider it, but its too early to tell at the moment.

Not exact matches

If this were an old Disney movie made while Walt was at the controls, this would be the moment in the story when a little bit of magic would appear — perhaps in the form of a fairy godmother or some pixie dust — to make things right.

A subterranean tunnel (pictured at lower right) leads up the mountainside to a «Graubünder barn» (a traditional barn built in the traditional style of the region, pictured at lower left), should an undetected escape become necessary, or perhaps if the occupants need access to safely stowed cows to handcraft some Swiss cheese.

If it feels right in your heart, the truth is that it will feel right in the hearts of those who need you, too — perhaps all 4.1 million of them.

If the company can't do anything right in the food department, perhaps a Silicon Valley-esque pivot is called for?

Perhaps, but do you want to wait around to see if I'm wrong, especially when the solution is right in the palm of your hand.

If mainstream Americans won't stop eating animal flesh for ethical reasons, suggest many animal rights advocates, then perhaps they will if they're given a tastier alternativIf mainstream Americans won't stop eating animal flesh for ethical reasons, suggest many animal rights advocates, then perhaps they will if they're given a tastier alternativif they're given a tastier alternative.

If this is the reason you're doing it, then perhaps talk to investors about whether they'd be willing to give up that right in a Series Seed equity deal.

If you're right out of school, you've got a lot of upside, but perhaps your finances don't look so great at the moment.

If you can anticipate the objections your persona will have, you can be prepared for them in the sales process and perhaps even educate them in your marketing collateral to help allay fears right away.

You will not get the insights that come from the right level of ethnographic research and the information will most likely be used incorrectly — perhaps even damaging if used for a high stakes initiative.

Perhaps a modern paraphrase for us today would be: «If I have my doctrinal statement nailed down flawlessly and am able to prove myself right by quoting verses to support my theology, but do not have love, I am dead wrong.»

It doesn't take a great deal of common sense to see that this gentleman is hurt emotionally (and perhaps he has every right to be... who wouldn't be if they were in his shoes), and he's angry.

If this is an example of GodsPeople, perhaps the the Atheists have it right.

If the christian right starts impeding on personal freedoms then perhaps it is time for a revolution.

If it's only about right here right now than perhaps you should jump in the volcano because after all, why put up with the difficuties of life.

I am not sure if superior is the right word, but if you don't feel that a position you hold is superior or perhaps more correct than the opposite position why would you hold it?

People talk of moving freely about as if it's to be expected and you just roll with the punches, and perhaps they are right however they have no idea the depth of the feeling... the ache and the confusion.

I wonder if perhaps someone needed to see how this, too, is what it looks like to proclaim the Gospel: quite pregnant, female, Bible open, voice filled with tears and laughter and passion, not from - away but rooted right here, imperfect.

If the Trump administration wants to get religious freedom right, perhaps President Trump can apply his words of «America first» to this crucial issue.

If progressive evangelicals want more free exchange and less institutional solidarity, perhaps they should lobby a bit more aggressively for the conscience rights of beleaguered institutions like Biola University and groups like Bowdoin Christian Fellowship.

Perhaps it represents a generation that had relaxed the radical renunciation of wealth he demanded, and felt that after all you must be realistic and practical; wealth is all right if you make the right use of it.

On the other hand, if Jenson is right, perhaps what is needed is a richer notion of the God in whom these processes occur.

Sane people can disagree about whether there ought to be a right to privacy, i.e., about whether it is logically a natural right and if so perhaps ought to be put into the Constitution via amendment, or about whether we (usually at state - level) should pass particular laws, such as ones that legalize gay - marriage, that factually expand what might be called privacy, but no sane U.S. Citizen, gay, straight, liberal, or conservative, should be left ignorant about the Constitution - wounding judicial usurpations done in the name of this right, more of which are planned to be done soon enough.

For example, even though the liberal state has no right to require its citizens who are Christians to accept Locke's proposition that toleration and a respect for religious freedom are the marks of the correct understanding of the Gospels, it has every reason to hope that they do, and perhaps to do more than hope — to educate and persuade, if not to coerce.

If the framers of the Constitution had been more morally courageous in identifying slavery as an evil, or if the later compensatory amendment had rooted liberty in a common human nature rather than on weaker procedural grounds of equality under the law, then perhaps the expansion of protected classes and arbitrary rights would not have advanced so stridentlIf the framers of the Constitution had been more morally courageous in identifying slavery as an evil, or if the later compensatory amendment had rooted liberty in a common human nature rather than on weaker procedural grounds of equality under the law, then perhaps the expansion of protected classes and arbitrary rights would not have advanced so stridentlif the later compensatory amendment had rooted liberty in a common human nature rather than on weaker procedural grounds of equality under the law, then perhaps the expansion of protected classes and arbitrary rights would not have advanced so stridently.

As a Christian, if a believer decides to become a disciple then perhaps at that point a believer surrenders his rights, per se, to follow God as he is led to do so.

I wondered if they were really the right person to lead this nation, and if their opponent was perhaps more qualified for the task.

If so, somebody must be doing something right, and if not, then perhaps a change is in ordeIf so, somebody must be doing something right, and if not, then perhaps a change is in ordeif not, then perhaps a change is in order.

If you're a perfectionist, perhaps the anxiety comes from past experiences of not knowing the right answer, or of trying to do something good, only to have someone else misinterpret your actions.

If you're only reasoning or defense for why something is right or wrong is begins with «the Bible / Qur «an says...» or «Jesus / Muhammed said...» then perhaps you need to do a bit more souls searching and critical thinking for yourself.

Right NAncy, and especially if they did not like the practice of selling salvation (martin luther) or dared to state that the earth was not the center of the universe (galileo galilei) or perhaps did not like killing people for eating meat during lent (spanish inquisition).

The governement can and perhaps should step out of the marriage business altogether, but it would have to be replaced by something equivalent, call it a civil union if you wish, that would give people the same rights.

Perhaps in McLaren's church, «everything has changed,» but in mine, addressing global poverty or AIDS or healthcare will get you branded as a «bleeding heart liberal» if you don't do it right.

Perhaps some one expresses himself, «It's all right with me if it comes out that way.»

Sorry, should read: «If you want to keep your own, perhaps you might consider supporting other people's right to keep their's.»

With 6:1 we perhaps return to something more directly taken from tradition: «If a man is detected in any misbehavior, you who are spiritual must put him right, very gently, and with great care lest you should be tempted yourselves.

If a significant number of theologians, bishops, and priests operate with a concept of conscience (and perhaps seemingly with the Pope's blessing) that reduces objective absolute moral norms to optional guidelines, that concept will free Catholics individually to determine what is right and wrong not just about divorce and remarriage, but about many other issues.

Perhaps if humanity survives it's religious zealots and exists for many millennia to come, we may gather enough evidence to point us in the right direction to answering that huge question about what caused the Universe to be.

6 --(yawn) Not sure what you are talking about due to your usual vagueness, but I'll take a stab at it — If I am right, and there is no heaven and no hell, you, as a believer and minister lose nothing by wasting years and years of your life preaching a lie, and convincing hundreds, perhaps thousands to believe that same lie, and waste millions, no, billions of dollars to pay for the continued propagation of that lie...?

I hope «Christianity» is the right religion, if it is not then I have wasted a lot of time and money, or perhaps not, for if one lives up to the values, beliefs and principles of true Christianity that one would be one of the nicest people to live on Earth with and as a child of 6 I realized I did not like any of the people in my neighborhood very much, not much at all.

If your beliefs on heaven and hell are right but you find yourself lacking a bit in some other necessary core beliefs, perhaps we can talk a lot more about things as we both roast in the big lake of fire

Perhaps if the tea baggers and the religious right (oxymoron) were not so fixated on which candidate for secular office could «out Jesus» the other, you would have a point.

Could we say perhaps there is not much if anything to figure out but just simply affirming that different environments call for different needs and as long as someone comes at things with the right attitude it's cool?

But if they judge us to be mad they will be wrong — or perhaps they will be both right and wrong.

And yet we grope, If perhaps we might find it, If perhaps we might build it right, If perhaps it won't matter if we don'If perhaps we might find it, If perhaps we might build it right, If perhaps it won't matter if we don'If perhaps we might build it right, If perhaps it won't matter if we don'If perhaps it won't matter if we don'if we don't.

Perhaps that most involved part is peeling / deveining the shrimp (if your shrimp are frozen, just pop them into a cool water bath to defrost for a few minutes first)-- We prefer to remove the entire shell, no tails since everything is cooked together and nobody wants to mess with pulling off cheesy - coated tails, right??

You are most likely right and perhaps if it has been a rough day, all three.

I don't have the link handy, and I haven't tried it, but it's cheap and reversible, so perhaps worth a try if you can't get decals right away?

Mine came out fine, so if it looks different, perhaps the ingredients weren't measured right.