Applicants should have
a PhD in a relevant discipline (e.g. Astrophysics, Applied Mathematics, Computational Fluid Dynamics or Planetary Sciences), together with computational experience, and they should be able to demonstrate the ability to conduct independent research and possess a developing track record of publications in international journals.
It's such an extreme bastardisation of the physics and mathematics relating to radiative fluxes that it should have been called out by EVERY
PhD in relevant disciplines and ridiculed for the Alice in Wonderland thinking it clearly is.
Not exact matches
Meanwhile, polytechnics seeking to be converted into Technical Universities should have the following requirements: a) satisfy the existing norms, guidelines and requirements of the National Council for Tertiary Education and the National Accreditation Board for accreditation as a Technical University, b) offer a minimum of four Bachelor of Technology degree programmes
in Science and Technology based
disciplines c) have academic departments headed by at least a Senior Lecturer with a
PhD and professional experience; and d) have at least three full - time lecturers with
relevant research master's degree, at least one of whom shall have industry experience.
The authors all hold
PhD's
in relevant disciplines.
I doubt that any geophysicist with a recent
PhD (or even a Masters)
in a
relevant discipline would make these errors, and at such a basic level.
Requires a Masters or
PhD in pharmacology, biochemistry, or related
discipline (
relevant industrial experience most critical)...