The expanded Oscar ballot makes it even harder than ever to win for cinematography without a Best
Picture nomination because voters tend to like to spread the wealth among the Best Pic nominees.
Not exact matches
In addition to Bullock's win, it somehow managed to get a best
picture nomination,
because 2009 was not the finest year for film.
That's
because it received a Best
Picture nomination but Ben Affleck failed to get a nod as Best Director.
But no Oscar predictor has the film on the list for Best
Picture even though many believe Sully could come in with a few
nominations because of the Eastwood - Hanks Academy connection.
You can knock «The Revenant's» chances
because the last time a movie won Best
Picture without a screenwriting
nomination was «Titanic» in 1998 (18 years ago).
The biggest complaints so far include Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close getting some
nominations, 50/50 being completely snubbed (I kind of agree that Gordon - Levitt got snubbed), and somehow people are upset that Bridesmaids didn't get a
nomination for best
picture, which blows my mind completely, not
because it wasn't nominated but for the fact that anyone would consider that film worthy of any sort of award.
This year, two documentaries crack my Best
Picture field, likely
because I didn't see five documentaries worthy of an Oscar
nomination, not that they don't exist... I just didn't see them.
• Jeff Wells is beside himself
because Oscar prognosticators understand «Che» has a snowball's chance in hell at a best
Picture nomination.
• «The Kids Are All Right,» with major
nominations including
picture, actress (Annette Bening), supporting actor Mark Ruffalo) and screenplay (Lisa Cholodenko and Stuart Blumberg), joins «Milk» among top nominees with a homosexual subject, and in a way is more meaningful
because it shows a functioning family rather than a single person.
You can always tell when the actors have their say
because the film will have a Best
Picture nomination and only one acting
nomination.
But just for kicks, and
because Pixar has a habit of making us think about stuff like this, let's examine what it might take for «Inside Out» to actually get that elusive Best
Picture nomination.
This is usually
because the film that wins also has a Best
Picture nomination, as so few of Deakins»
nominations have had.
That might be
because The Weinstein Co did not get a Best
Picture nomination last year.
The victory for «The Shape of Water» is rather surprising
because, for the first time in over 20 years, a Best
Picture winner has won the top prize without having a
nomination for Best Cast from SAG, along with another big surprise of not winning its respective Screenplay category on the way to the top.
A Best
Picture nomination for that could be her ticket to the Oscars, but Witherspoon won't need that
because she's one of a few practically guaranteed to be nominated in one of the acting categories.
Or maybe it's
because no SAG Ensemble
nomination + no BAFTA / Oscar screenplay
nominations have always been insurmountable roadblocks for winning Best
Picture, regardless.
Perhaps this is
because this Merchant Ivory production earned eight Oscar
nominations, including nods for Actor (Anthony Hopkins), Actress (Emma Thompson), and Best
Picture.
We aren't sure what that something is, but we know something is out there, In The Sixth Sense that «something» revealed made it a great film in the eyes of many viewers, earning it an Academy Award
nomination for Best
Picture, but I feel that it is only
because people who saw the film had no idea there was a «something», and were genuinely unprepared for the bottom dropping out of the story in the end.