Sentences with phrase «pipeline joint review»

Not exact matches

«In December 2013, the Joint Review Panel found that construction and operation of the Northern Gateway Pipelines project is in the public interest, subject to 209 conditions being met by the proponent.

VICTORIA — The National Energy Board is shutting out important voices by limiting the scope and depth of participation in the Joint Review Panel hearings on the Kinder Morgan pipeline expansion, say the New Democrats.

«Harper indicated before the joint review panel even started its sessions he wanted that pipeline through,» Suzuki told DeSmog Canada.

Natural Resources Minister Greg Rickford said in a statement: «In December 2013, the Joint Review Panel found that construction and operation of the Northern Gateway Pipelines project is in the public interest, subject to 209 conditions being met by the proponent.

The Government of Canada approved the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline Tuesday, six months after the Joint Review Panel recommended the pipeline be built subject to 209 conditions.

For that reason, our government can not support the issuance of a certificate for the pipeline as it was presented to the Joint Review Panel.

The mandate of the joint review panel ensured that it focused on risks which can be mitigated without harming the pipeline or the prospect of future of oil sands development while ignoring the larger risks that can't be so easily mitigated.

However, [they] have presented little evidence as to how they will respond... For that reason, our government can not support the issuance of a certificate for the pipeline as it was presented to the Joint Review Panel.»

In 2012 - 2014, we represented Heiltsuk First Nation before the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline Joint Review Panel, and in 2015 - 2016, we represented Heiltsuk First Nation and Kitasoo / Xai» xais during a judicial review before the Federal Court of Appeal, and successfully challenged the decisions of the National Energy Board and government to allow the building of the pipReview Panel, and in 2015 - 2016, we represented Heiltsuk First Nation and Kitasoo / Xai» xais during a judicial review before the Federal Court of Appeal, and successfully challenged the decisions of the National Energy Board and government to allow the building of the pipreview before the Federal Court of Appeal, and successfully challenged the decisions of the National Energy Board and government to allow the building of the pipeline.

Ongoing pipeline reviews: While there is a strong argument that the FCA may have applied the wrong sections of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 in Gitxaala (given that the Enbridge Joint Review Panel was operating under transitional rules), the analysis of the FCA is certainly applicable to more recent environmental assessments conducted by the National Energy Board — like those for the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain and Energy East oil tanker and pipeline projects.