Christiansen has described (PDF) her journal as
a place for skeptics to go when their papers are rejected by more mainstream science journals.
Is There
a Place for Skeptics in the Church?
Not exact matches
Bartholomew does not directly engage many contemporary Christian
place -
skeptics» those who agree,
for example, with Michael Novak that whatever diminishment of
place it may cause, globalization has made these «the best of times
for those committed to solidarity.»
In 2012 the lines between the sacred and the profane will get even more blurry: Scientists will religiously maintain their search
for the elusive God particle (they won't find it); evangelical sports superhero and Denver Bronco quarterback Tim Tebow will continue to be both an inspiration to the faithful and an object of scorn to
skeptics (he will be watching, not playing in, the Super Bowl); at least one well - known religious leader or leading religious politician will be brought down by a sex scandal (let's hope all our leaders have learned a lesson from former Rep. Anthony Weiner and stay away from sexting); and the «nones» - those who don't identify with one religion - will grow even more numerous and find religious meanings in unexpected
places (what TV show will become this season's «Lost»?)
There can be no
place for the poor in spirit, the
skeptics, the pessimists, the sad of heart, the weary and the immobilists.
Turkey's media -
skeptic leader, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who has gained notoriety
for cracking down on his country's press core, has hailed Trump
for putting CNN's Jim Acosta «in his
place.»
Though carbon dating
placed the manuscript in the 13th century,
skeptics argued that it was not uncommon
for looters to create forgeries on period - correct paper taken from ancient caches.
If all goes well, GPIC will make the building its headquarters, a
place to continue its research and a «living lab»
for green - building
skeptics to visit.
Eventually, you go from being an optimistic seeker and wanting to make the world a better
place to a burned - out, jaded, and closed - hearted person; you turn into a
skeptic with a Ph.D. in why things didn't work out
for you.
Instead, González comes across as a
skeptic, wary of the enthusiasm
for, as the article puts it, «all of the educational experimentation» that took
place on Klein's watch.
Art's top
skeptic and a fine candidate
for anyone's best list, William Powhida,
places the center of the art world a few blocks southwest, with Jeffrey Deitch even before his move to LA MOCA, but I am entitled to my conspiracy theories, too.
ICE's plan called
for placing these three scientists, along with fellow greenhouse
skeptic S. Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virgina, in broadcast appearances, op - ed pages, and newspaper interviews.
Government in the U.K. and other
places outside of the United States seem to have supported the consensus IPCC findings on global warming, which has kept their
skeptics at bay in their countries
for the most part (except perhaps in Australia which is heavily influenced by interests in the U.S.).
It is somehow unsurprising that your sources
for «climategate» are a series of cherry - picked, out of context quotes from one of the British tabloids that hyped the faux scandal in the first
place, and a «
skeptic» blog.
Today I offer this post as a «Summary
for Policymakers» regarding my series of seven prior blog posts about a smear effort which took
place back in 2007 that is a case study
for examining other prior and current industry corruption accusations against
skeptic climate scientists.
when
skeptics are forced to answer that question, the only safe hiding
place for them is to say «they do nt know what effect added GHGs will have» and then when confronted with the vast amount of evidence that counts «
for» a warming hypothesis, it does nt seem rational reject the theory that added GHGs will (all things being equal) warm the planet.
Yes, and that's where this thing ends up with a weirder problem courtesy of the same Ozone Action
place where Gelbspan and their people simultaneously somehow «obtained» the documents which have long been used to accuse
skeptic climate scientists of accepting fossil fuel industry bribes in exchange
for lying to the public about the certainty of catastrophic man - caused global warming.
«I would call myself a pragmatic
skeptic... I think that some of the issues have been oversold, may have been oversold, because they allow
for more regulation to take
place.»
This abysmal failure to show us all absolute evidence of illicit money exchanged
for fabricated, demonstratively false science papers / assessments is the proverbial «mathematical certainty «that dooms the accusation, and
places the whole idea of man - caused global warming in peril of sinking if its promoters can not defend their position against science - based criticism from
skeptic scientists.
In other words, we could have trusted the scientists in the first
place and would have if certain «
skeptics» and deniers — yes, I will use that word
for those disputed science
for political or economic interests — hadn't raised unfounded doubt.
Neither of us could understand why a committed
skeptic would settle
for «hiatus» in
place of «peak».