Despite a couple of decent performances, it is now certain that the England international is not capable of leading the line, nor is he capable of
playing at wing - back, which is well illustrated by the fact that Nacho Monreal, Kieran Gibbs, Alex Oxlade - Chamberlain, Hector Bellerin and Alex Iwobi are all ahead of him in the pecking order for the wide positions.
Theo Walcott is a very dangerous player.Arsenal should be lucky to have him.I do hope he signs a new contract because we need him very much.In my opinion he should stay on the wing because he is specialized for that role.His style of play shows this.He would get us a lot of goals when
playing at the wing so at least he should be there instead of the cf role where he may or may not excel.SIGN DA TING
More likely Ramsey stays (After all, he's the future of Arsenal according to Wenger) Ox might go (To avoid spending the next 2 years
playing at wing - back) Lacazette will go somewhere that doesn't try to get him on - the - cheap.
The Spaniard simply does not seem to have the legs as we saw in the game against Boro and I feel Kieran would be better suited to
play at wing - back as pace will be crucial in dealing with the likes of Sane and De Bruyne.
Was Ousmane Dembele
played at wing back at Dortmund?
Did Walcott
play at wing back when he made the English team to the World Cup at 17?
As CAM, Ozil
play at both wings, left or right, and his assist stats is speaking well.
Our side will be keen for a big performance against the Reds, having already been embarrassed by the Anfield club in August when they gave us a 4 - 0 thrashing on Merseyside, and Alex Oxlade - Chamberlain will hopefully be on the end of both defeats having
played at wing - back for us in the reverse fixture shortly before moving to our rivals.
Anyone who
plays at the wings in Arsenal suffers with time, Ramsey, Ozil, Carzola... unless they change position.
Nelson has also mostly
played at wing - back for Arsenal's senior side, even if he has looked more at home in attacking midfield at youth level.
sanchez is NOT a striker, he loves to cut in from the wing and Ozil CAN NOt
play at the wing (for germany its different, they have a bloody strong team).
Wenger back in his crap.I n order to impose Ramsey in the team,
he plays him at the wing that does not suit him.We have fast wingers, Welbeck or Walcott, play them with Giroud in the middle.
we have Nelson, Sanchez, Walcott, ox all who can
play at the wing, lemar is not a priority maybe you can link us to good cm you attention seeker, stop this lemar love affair are gay!
Although he can
play at the wings more especially at right winger.
During pre-season, Wenger played Joe Willock in central midfield while Oxlade - Chamberlain
played at wing - back.
The 25 - year - old can
play at wing - back or full - back and has been capped by Italy.
Not exact matches
Walcott seems to be in a battle of wills with Wenger over his contract
at the moment, so he was given (unsuccessfully) half an hour in Giroud's place as centre - forward against Swansea, but Ramsey thinks he should be
playing in his own place on the
wing.
Apart from his preferred role of
playing as a box - to - box midfielder, the Juventus star can also
play as a winger, a full - back or as a
wing - back, whilst also having
played as a centre - back in a three - man defence during his spell
at Marseille in the 2014 - 15 season, under manager Marcelo Bielsa.
wenger
plays our cam's on the
wings because they can
play 3 positions
at once - winger, attacking midfield, and defender.
@ Tony Montana (The Realest)
At the WC and at man U he was playing on the wing and definitely and an outright winger was going to be better than hi
At the WC and
at man U he was playing on the wing and definitely and an outright winger was going to be better than hi
at man U he was
playing on the
wing and definitely and an outright winger was going to be better than him!
Ozil is
played on the
wing because it is not quite so damaging to have a spectator standing on the
wing as opposed to him being a spectator
at no 10.
It would make more sense, like
at Barca, for Arsenal to have a top striker in the center (Higuain or Aubamayng) and Sanchez on the right
wing or to
play Sanchez as a nr 10 in a 4 -4-2 type of style where he can
play of a more physical central striker.
Sanogo is usually injured, Campbell has not
played a singer game
at ST for us, and Sanchez will need time to settle and his far better on the
wings or
playing as a support striker.
Wenger always refers to the
wing as a learning tool and
at Freiburg he was forced to
play out of position as a LAM.
he could have said i hated
playing on the
wing, or wenger was the reason and we wouldnt have minded but saying he left to «improve»
at liverpool and
play more regularly is stupid.
Either
play him as a No. 10 or don't
play him
at all, he can't
play on the
wing.
If we looked
at the pre-season and opening game, the Ox was constantly moved between either
wings or the
wing back position and this does not do well with players in general who'd prefer a defined role and position in which they can
play in.
Wenger needs to
play the right player on the left
wing, I thought this is what they do in practice and all, currently the left
wing in like rehab
at Arsenal, if there is a player lacking fitness or game time just throw him on the left
wing!!!
«He was the perfect team - mate for me
at Barcelona because his understanding of
wing play was second to none.
It is quite another to say to a young player, you are no3 striker after giroud, who will go on a goal drought
at some point and walcott who wants to
play on the
wing and will almost certainly get injured.
The only thing that matters is that he often
plays the left
wing poorly or not
at all and he normally
plays much better in the middle.
Speaking after Walcott announced that he wants to return to
playing on the
wing, where has had his better days, Wenger has instead came out to the media to announce that he personally sees Walcott's future as a striker
at Arsenal, rather than a winger.
Playing Gibbs on the
wing problem is he passes ball back.Play Monreal on flank and Gibbs
at left back.Play Ramsey and Flamini in middle Le Coqu on bench use him only if needed.
The main difference in the game was having pacey players on the
wings and
at CF with Ozil and Cazorla
playing centrally where they excel.
we lack penetration as
at least having bellerin up the field is the different matter.Take one of them OFF and bring Theo so the attack has more presence.we got
wing backs but we are
playing narrow in the centre..
«Coutinho replacement» is just a phrase that is use, we need someone the quality of Coutinho to get into the team, a player not necessary as skillful as him but can
play at either
wings, or as a
play maker, he should share the goal scoring duty with the front 3, as well as rotating with the 2 players
at the
wing.
haven't you seen Giroud drifting to the
wings because our players who were supposed to be
playing there were too busy
at the center of midfield doing God knows what?
Not exactly the same kind of player as Alves, but one United have looked
at before as an option to come in and
play wing - back in a 3 -5-2, Juan Cuadrado is quite simply an extraordinary talent.
We were
playing at home so their game plan was to sit back, allow us come out, so they can hit us on a counter through their
wings.
I think so, he
played well
at palace but I just feel if we give it a right go with plenty of pace on the
wings we could put 3 / 4/5 past that Liverpool defence.
The 26 - year - old is regarded as one of the top full - backs in the game
at the moment and looks ideal to
play wing - back in Conte's 3 -4-3 or 3 -5-2 systems.
To be honest, the idea isn't bad, but the current manager has not been able to improve players in defensive positions... But it's good that
at least we now have 3 players who can
play as
wing backs well enough.
Stevens
played a traditional big position for Connecticut because of the Huskies» lack of size, but she showed in her first two seasons
at Duke that can stretch out to the
wing and
play on the perimeter, too.
Expect to see Lacazette as a DM
at some point, Ramsey, Denilson, Wilshere, Cazorla and bunch of other forwards have done, where will our new Armenian
play if Lacazette is on the
wing?
He featured for the first team
at wing - back earlier in the season, but has been
playing in his natural attacking midfield role in the Championship.
«Hell, Sanchez
played right
wing at Barcelona and was the third top goalscorer in La Liga, so Wenger
played him on the left
wing»
Princeton is
playing it close to the vest, but the word is that the Tigers may be giving up the single
wing so that Scott MacBean and Brian McCullough can be in the back - field
at the same time.
But the one question that has dogged his interviews on and off since the U.S. Open
at Winged Foot in 1974, the question that he had to answer over and over again throughout the week
at Augusta, even though he was
playing one fine round after another, seemed finally to have been laid to rest.
Exactly, the ones who don't look like they have the weak mentality get sided out for no reason, Sanchez was scoring for fun when he was free to
play in the centre and the
wings, but he was outshining Giroud so the manager restricted him, Ramsey was scoring for fun when he was allowed to shoot outside the box and had players supporting him
at the back but now the manager tells him to
play Cazorla role instead, when Ox was new he was dribbling past City defenders for fun but then he was benched for Walcott who can't even dribble past one defender, now we have Campbell who always impresses on the pitch but the manager benches him for a player with no confidence.
Gonzalo Huigine or Lacazetteg Wingers or Attacking midfielders we don not need
at all as we have some of the best in these two postions Do not forget we have Gnarby also along with with OX and Theo, Welbeck also can
play in
wings May be solid CB