Sentences with phrase «playing big means»

Not exact matches

At Dyn, our platform play has meant that we're now prepared to hunt down opportunities in business categories that are emerging as the big prospects of the future: automation, predictive analytics, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT), full cloud adoption, mobile and ever more globalization and global growth.

Minnesota Vikings fans were hoping to see their home team play in the big game at Minneapolis» U.S. Bank Stadium, but Sunday's 38 - 7 shellacking by the Philadelphia Eagles means tickets on the resale market aren't quite as insanely priced — though they're hardly cheap.

«If equivalence plays a much bigger role than it plays today then we need enhanced equivalence, that means putting on the table how does this equivalence work,» he told Reuters during a visit to London.

This is a console aimed at folks who already have those problems solved and simply want a means to play Nintendo's biggest games.

Fewer big players could mean fewer dollars at play to expand oil sands.

(CNN)- Just because President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney mostly have avoided talking religion during this campaign doesn't mean religion won't play a big role in determining the winner of the presidential race.

We really need to ask ourselves: Can we enjoy the big game, even if it means in 30 years these players won't be able to remember the plays that brought us so much joy?

Instead, the unheralded but uniquely talented songwriter has had to settle for the status of Texas Music icon (which ain't a bad thing to have to «settle» for, especially when it means that a former Texas Governor and President of the United States is a big fan and it gets you a gig playing at his 2004 Presidential Inauguration).

the problem isn't cos he isn't WC, the problem is cos he is a rich man's Andy Carroll; I mean even Defoe that play for relegation candidate - Sunderland is a far better striker than him.he isn't WorldClass either Chicharito is also way better, he isn't a 30 - goal striker but when u play almost all games for a club with the creativity as Arsenal, scoring 30goals isn't a big deal.

But in the meantime we have Arteta as captain which means he plays every game he is fit for when he is clearly not up to the standard of DM we need for the matches against our biggest rivals.

it seems wenger does nt have the courage to play big... he does nt take risks... then he says he was looking at the player of the moment, or he said the same speech u already gave to us to defend something that is, for me, only stubborness and lack of diligence... about granit: do nt start with formal arguments, go to the bone, u know what i mean... u cant said xhaka was the good choise while we did nt see hin play for our colours... i hope he could be the player that we need, but nobody can said that today

It meant they avoided playing the big pressure games were a team can be deemed bottlers after it's played.

When you aren't recording a ton of big plays, that means you have to avoid mistakes for eight or 10 plays at a time to score touchdowns.

If we do, then it just means we have one less of the big boss to play.

Losing Iyiegbuniwe (who declared early for the NFL Draft after making 11.5 TFLs), Johnson, and end Derik Overstreet means losing by far your three biggest play - makers.

Adopting wing backs and a three man defence means we can play lot more direct and to a bigger imposing CF which Sanchez is not.

Grimm is an amateur poker player — which means he plays poker for money but not for a living — and an amateur would have as much chance in the big poker game at the Horseshoe as Cadillac Jack would have of bringing in a wildcat oil well through the floor of the First National Bank building in Abilene, Texas, where the Grimm Oil Company is located.

when well» beckperez, then we can have a bigger 4ward line for rotation.that would mean AW can rest any of our front men without distracting our play style.miss our 90 + min match winner DW23.!

Because we can play with the big boys does not mean we can spend with the big boys.

I mean, FFS, if he could play like this against the big boys, what else can we ask for?

The Steelers offense will present the biggest challenge for the Bills defense, but if we play them, it means we've won a playoff game.

That means we lose the pace of Danny Welbeck up front, but that can be compensated by playing the pacy Alexis and Oxlade - Chamberlain in the wide attacking positions, with Cazorla creating chances for them and linking up with the big French striker.

Arsenal have to secure the attack and get Alexis ready for the match against Barca and the remaining fixtures against top premier league sides.The team has to win against Barca and then beat them at Nou - Camp causes it really is irritating to see Wenger playing bad players in the big matches in the past, Arsenal have allowed themselves to be weak where Wenger is after the league means these Southhampton, Stoke, Chelsea get the luck against this side.

Miller's ability to run with the ball in his hands means he won't always have to catch go routes to make big plays.

That means that we still have at least one big, hot name remaining in each group, and semifinals of Azarenka - Kerber and Kvitova - Sharapova are still in play.

Giroud is lost, he needs to be benched but who is gonna replace him because I can't explain why a 6» 2 big man supposedly falls down at the slightest touch, he keeps playing back to the goal, I mean how are you gonna score backing the goal?

but we know talent wins in the league more than anything else, and if you have someone guys like, someone guys will play hard for, someone who guys want around because they know it'll mean good things for their career, then that's a big part of getting to a good place

Doesn't take a math major to see that means he had a 48 - yard return, which would definitely qualify as a big play.

The way that Wenger has Arsenal set up to play, usually anyway as we dominate possession against all but the biggest clubs we face, means that his power as a target man and his link up play are invaluable in breaking down stubborn defences and bringing the players around him into dangerous areas.

I would like to tell arsenal fan that the transfer window is not arsenal's problem.Let explain what is in my mind.We need to reinforce our team but we need to think in the future that most of the high class players are going to refuse signing for arsenal fc because of Mr Wenger's philosophy.It looks like arsenal becomes cemetery of players.How many players came in and left because of performance, became good players out of arsenal.We need to accept all of the transformation Mr wenger brings in arsenal but now it does not work.Why??? because lack of tactics, strategies and pretending best players for Mr wenger mind but in reality those players do not get standard of best player.Mr wenger wants to prove everybody that he is wright that players who are calling by wenger are best.I means Mr wenger is the only one can see all matter in good position or bad.He is wrong by thinking this way.He does not like criticism.he is the mind of arsenal.Everything he can say or defend is wright.Think about morrinho comments about arsenal!!!! Why he likes to be arsenal coach!!!! One thing I want to say about arsenal players, I think everybody watch arsenal games.We have got short mind players who play two good games and the rest shameless.They are working hard in the training ground for catching Mr wenger's mind to let them play; what is behind their (players) mind to be the most regular players.Those players have no vision even ambition; they are never becoming high class and their carriers are going to finish in arsenal after arsenal we are going to see them playing for championship.They do not care to become legend as Ian wright, Vierra, Berckam, piress, Henry... What is the big behind their mind to use wenger name to be selected in national team.They are not able to face different leagues in the world.

If we play 3 -4-2-1 again then we need a strong presence who can hold the ball up which in the PL usually means a bigger physique (but not always).

It could mean another big night for ace wide receiver Jordy Nelson, who caught two touchdowns last time these two teams played and leads the Packers with 737 receiving yards.

He will then say we need to secure qualification (through play offs) before we can attract big players, which will then mean end of august or last two weeks of August.

But both Lukaku and Morata are regarded than Giroud and are both better than Giroud like it or not.Morata has not really had a team where he's been the main man and I don't think he's played the number of games Giroud has.As for Lukaku not outscoring Giroud in the big games it's not a problem.Even if it was vice versa it means nothing.I'd take Lukaku over Giroud all day long.

It's funny how he said we are better than Liverpool overrall forgetting that in terms of players we were still better than them last season yet the beat us home and away.Liverpool team is not so good yet out of all the top four team they're the ones who play their hearts out.That's why Liverpool didn't lose a single game to a top four team last season though on paper they should have.As for Tottenham if you look at their team they just need a few more signings and consistency so I don't know what's the big deal about them.The painful this is they could've won the league if not for draws.It was a disgrace for any of those two to finish over us last season because on paper it shouldn't be so.This should tell you that it's not all about the team you have.Some it's about luck, sometimes it's about giving your best and sometimes it's just meant to be.

In the past the Champions League has meant big money, playing amongst Europe's elite.

Our biggest hopes got outclassed, outhustled and everything else... i mean im going to believe even if we lose this one and go 0 - 3 im a gambling man we always do, but still we have to have our guys play perfect to turn this all around... Well lets see what happens!

Bringing in players with big names and wages means he will find it difficult to get playing time.

We will win our game against Bayern Munich, if our players can wake up from their slumber and play football the way it is meant to be played for a big club like Arsenal.

With Welbeck therefore ruled out, it means that Wenger may decide to include another first team big name to play against the non-league side.

The one thing that I can see that could give us an advantage is the fact that we are definite underdogs, which normally means that you can play without fear as there is less pressure on us, while Bayern will be desperate to get a big lead in the first leg.

The bigger tyres mean more rubber touching the track surface, so grip levels look set to increase by quite some margin and will play a big role in cutting lap times.

The one constant is Wenger but the fault is not only his... Now players are showing there discontent by not even considering big offers from within the club even if it means going somewhere else for less money and still playing out of position.

... break that big long string of words and # «s into sections, and if you are, say, a receiver, listen for your part of the play, and remember what that means, ignoring everything else.

It has an even bigger meaning now because there are three points between the teams, and we play at home in a big game.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

TBH playing for a big team doesn't mean you are world class.

That means extending drives, even if it only results in changing the field position, preventing big plays on defense and avoiding turnovers.

Combine measures like broad jump (correlation with pro marginal explosiveness: 0.18), bench press reps -LRB--0.20, meaning the more you bench, the less explosive you're likely to be), and vertical jump (0.13) are more closely tied to big - play potential than how many big plays you broke at the college level.

A dependable 4th big would mean Davis and Cousins can play less.