Sentences with phrase «point temperature then»

When one cooks these foods at boiling point temperatures then the lectins are indeed deactivated.

Not exact matches

In a series of carefully calibrated steps during the sintering process, the polymer is burned off, and then the metal is fused together at a temperature well below its melting point.

I would recommend any oil that's liquid at room temperature, so if it's generally hot where you live and above the melting point for coconut oil then it should be fine.

Make ahead: at this point you could cover and refrigerate the rolls overnight then let them come back to room temperature for 1 hour before baking.

1) Pre-heat oven to 300 deg Fahrenheit (150 deg cel) 2) Line one large baking sheet (0r two medium baking sheets) with parchment paper 3) In a large bowl, combine the oats, chia seeds, flax seeds, raisins, almonds and other nuts, and mix well 4) In a smaller bowl, whisk together the honey, light brown sugar, melted butter and cinnamon until smooth and sugar has dissolved 5) Pour the honey mixture over the dry ingredients and stir well until you get a homogeneous mixture 6) Pour the mixture over the baking sheets and spread evenly with a spatula, then season lightly with sea salt 7) Bake for 15 minutes, then stir the granola gently (to make sure all sides are cooked) 8) At this point, you may need to switch the baking sheets (if you are using 2) so the granola cooks evenly 9) Bake for another 15 minutes, then stir again, before cooking for a final 15 minutes or until golden brown 10) Remove granola from the oven and place on cooking racks until completely cool and crisp 11) Store granola in air - tight containers at room temperature.

* At this point, the dish can be cooled to room temperature, then covered tightly and stored in the refrigerator for 2 to 3 days.

The temperatures are very high — olive oil started to smoke a lot (I used pomace which has much higher smoking point then vergin) and my pan twisted from the heat a bit!

Ovens are calibrated to hit their set temperature, then shut off the heat until the temperature falls below a certain point — usually 25 °F to 50 °F below the set temperature before heating back up again.

Here's the bottom line: Your basal body temperature will reach its lowest point at ovulation and then rise immediately about a half a degree as soon as ovulation occurs.

Which is a point I am surprised hasn't been brought up yet during the «pink slime debate»: the safest way of treating food you are preparing is to cook it to the proper temperature, then serve it within an appropriate amount of time.

The temperature will drop to its lowest point, 1 - 2 days prior to ovulation, and then rises and remains elevated until a couple of days before impending menstruation.

This alleviates the quantum traffic jam so that, when the material is cooled to a certain temperature, oppositely aligned electrons (magnetic partners where the «spin» of one electron points up and the adjacent one points down) form pairs and then become free to zip through the material unimpeded - a superconductor.

«Then both before and after the arrival of an oxygen atmosphere, the planet went into partial or potentially total snowball periods — millions of years when the Earth's mean temperature was well below the freezing point.»

It says not to stir until the setting point has reached 105c, when it has reached this temperature theN you stir or you will burn the jam.

That first morning, the temperature already a sweltering 96 degrees, I was handed a stack of textbooks and a schedule, then pointed in the direction of my first class.

If it's not an unvented fuel cap problem or a carburetor jet problem then it is most likely an electrical problem (coil, points, etc.) that becomes unstable when it warms up to operating temperature.

ST2, Overhead Console, HID Cornering Headlamps, Power Moonroof, Radio: Sony Audio System, single - CD, SiriusXM Radio, HD Radio and 10 speakers, SiriusXM audio and data services each require a subscription sold separately, or as a package, by Sirius XM Radio Inc, If you decide to continue service after your trial, the subscription plan you choose will automatically renew thereafter and you will be charged according to your chosen payment method at then - current rates, Fees and taxes apply, To cancel you must call SiriusXM at 1-866-635-2349, See SiriusXM Customer Agreement for complete terms at www.siriusxm.com, All fees and programming subject to change, Sirius, XM and all related marks and logos are trademarks of Sirius XM Radio Inc, SYNC 3 Communications & Entertainment System, enhanced voice recognition, 8» LCD capacitive touchscreen in center stack w / swipe capability, AppLink, 911 Assist, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto compatability, 2 Smart Charging USB ports,; Bluetooth and steering wheel controls, Sirius XM service is not available in Alaska and Hawaii, SYNC AppLink lets you control some of your favorite compatible mobile apps w / your voice, It is compatible w / select smartphone platforms, Commands may vary by phone and AppLink software, Dual - Zone Electronic Automatic Temperature Control, ST3, Heated Sideview Mirrors, Heated 3 Point Steering Wheel, Rear Armrest, SecuriCode Keyless - Entry Keypad, Ambient Lighting, Voice Activated Touchscreen Navigation, pinch - to - zoom capability, SiriusXM Traffic and Travel Link w / a 5 - year prepaid subscription, SiriusXM Traffic and Travel Link services are not available in Alaska and Hawaii, SiriusXM audio and data services each require a subscription sold separately, or as a package, by Sirius XM Radio Inc, If you decide to continue service after your trial,; the subscription plan you choose will automatically renew thereafter and you will be charged according to your chosen payment method at then - current rates, Fees and taxes apply, To cancel you must call SiriusXM at 1-866-635-2349, See SiriusXM Customer Agreement for complete terms at www.siriusxm.com, All fees and programming subject to change, Sirius, XM and all related marks and logos are trademarks of Sirius XM Radio Inc, Carbon Fiber Interior Accent Package, boost gauge bezel, door grab handle inserts, e-brake handle and shift knob

With 755 horsepower the 2019 Chevrolet Corvette zr1 is the most powerful Corvette ever it's also the most technologically advanced behind me are the rolling s's at Road Atlanta and we're here to see if we can reach to the supercar levels of performance afforded by this thing's massive power big tires and the tall wing on the back after that we'll take to the streets to see if a car this powerful can behave itself in public this is a monster of a car I've had some brief track opportunities moving this morning to get used to the pace of this machine which is phenomenal we're gonna warm up as we get out to the road Atlanta and sort of build up to the pace that this car can operate at now initially when you hop in this car you have this shrine to the engine right above you you see the line of the hood it kind of dominates the center of the view you can see over it it doesn't affect visibility but it's immediately obvious and that kind of speaks to what makes this car special it's a monster of an engine listen to that [Music] that is tremendous tremendous acceleration and incredible power but what I finding so far my brief time here at the Atlanta is that everything else in the car is rut has risen to match hurt me while I lay into it on the back straight look you know 150 mile - an - hour indicated we're going to ease up a little bit on it because I need to focus on talking rather than driving but like I was saying the attributes of the rest of the car the steering the braking capability the grip every system of this car is riding to the same level of the power and I think that's what makes it really impressive initially this is undoubtedly a mega mega fast car but it's one that doesn't terrify you with its performance potential there's a level of electronic sophistication that is unparalleled at this price point but it's hard not to get you know totally slipped away by the power of this engine so that's why I keep coming back to it this car has an electronically controlled limited slip differential it has shocks filled with magnetically responsive fluid that can react faster to inputs and everything this car has a super sophisticated stability control system that teaches you how to drive it quick but also makes you go faster we haven't even gotten into exploring it yet because the limits of this car are so high that frankly it takes a while to grow into it but [Music] I think what's impressive about this car is despite how fast it is it is approachable you can buy this car to track dates with it and grow with it as a driver and as an owner I think that's a really special [Music] because you will never be more talented than this car is fast ever unless you are a racing driver casually grazing under 50 miles an hour on this straight okay I'm just going to enjoy driving this now [Music][Applause][Music] this particular Corvette zr1 comes with the cars track performance package a lot of those changes happen underneath the sheet metal but one of the big differences that is immediately obvious is this giant carbon fiber wing now the way this thing is mounted is actually into the structure of the vehicle and it makes you know loading the rear hatch a bit more difficult but we're assuming that's okay if you're looking for the track performance this thing delivers also giving you that performance are these Michelin Pilot Sport cup tires which are basically track oriented tires that you can drive on the street but as we wake our way to the front of the thing what really matters is what's under the hood that's right there's actually a hole in the hood of this thing and that's because this engine is so tall it's tall because it has a larger supercharger and a bunch of added cooling on it to help it you know keep at the right temperature the supercharger is way larger than the one on the zo six and it has a more cooling capacity and the downside is it's taller so it pops literally through the hood the cool thing is from the top you can actually see this shake when you're looking at it from you know a camera from the top of the vehicle this all makes for 755 horsepower making this the most powerful Corvette ever now what's important about that is this not just the power but likewise everything in the car has to be built to accommodate and be able to drive to the level of speed this thing can develop that's why you had the massive cooling so I had the aerodynamics and that's why I had the electronic sophistication inside [Applause] we had a lot of time to take this car on the track yesterday and I've had the night to think about things Matt today two crews on the road and see how this extreme performance machine deals with the sort of more civil minded stuff of street driving the track impressions remain this thing is unquestionably one of the most capable cars you can get from a dealer these days a lot of that's besides the point now because we're on the street we have speed limits they have the ever - present threat of law enforcement around every corner so the question is what does this car feel like in public when you slow this car down it feels like a more powerful Corvette you don't get much tram lining from these big wheels though we as the front end doesn't want to follow grooves in the pavement it is louder it is a little firmer but it's certainly livable on a day to day basis that's surprising for a vehicle of this capability normally these track oriented cars are so hardcore that you wouldn't want to drive them to the racetrack but let's face it you spend more time driving to the track than you do on the track and the fact that this thing works well in both disciplines is really impressive I can also dial everything back and cruise and not feel like I'm getting punished for driving a hardcore track machine that's a that's a really nice accomplishment that's something that you won't find in cars that are this fast and costs maybe double this much the engine in this car dominates the entire experience you can't miss the engine and the whole friend this car is sort of a shrine to it the way it pops out of the hood the way it's covered with coolers around the sides it is the experience of this car and that does make driving this thing special and also the fact that it doesn't look half bad either in fact I think it has some of the coolest looking wheels currently available on a new car this car as we mentioned this car has the track package the track package on this car gives you what they call competition bucket seats which are a little wide for my tastes but I'm you know not the widest person in the world this automatic transmission works well I mean there's so much torque again out of this engine that it can be very smooth and almost imperceptible its clunky on occasion I think I'd might opt for the manual although Chevy tells me about 80 % of its customers will go for the automatic I don't think they're gonna be disappointed and that's gonna be the faster transmission drag strip on the street - and on the racetrack man it was a little bit more satisfying to my taste though we've talked about the exhaust I have it set in the track setting let's quiet it down a little bit so you can hear the difference now I've set that separately from everything else so let's put it stealth what happened to the engine sound that's pretty that's pretty amazing man stealth is really stealth and then go back to track Wow actually a really big difference that's that's pretty great the Corvette has always been a strong value proposition and nowhere is that more evident than this zr1 giving you a nearly unbeatable track performance per dollar now the nice thing is on the road this doesn't feel like a ragged edge track machine either you could genuinely drive it every day the compromises are few and that's what makes this car so special if you like what you see keep it tuned right here and be sure to visit Edmunds.com [Music]

You could argue the data on 30's arctic warming is too sparse both spatially and temporally to be a realistic test of model performance, but then you start to weaken your point about «well characterized» global surface temperature.

Then, each point from each temperature station is corrected by making a «weighted average» with points from nearby stations (depending on their distance — sometimes up to 1200 km).

I am (simplistically) assuming that such a reconstruction will then diverge in all presently non-divergent points, but might give an indication of the absolute temperatures reached earlier?

Chris O'Neill, If you think a graph of GISTEMP since 1880 is in any way empirical proof that there is a human component to the increasing global temperature then there is no point discussing further

If you think a graph of GISTEMP since 1880 is in any way empirical proof that there is a human component to the increasing global temperature then there is no point discussing further.

If you need to «select» various trees that match local climate to use as a temperature proxy, then this obviously raises two points.

But if at some point temperatures warmed sufficiently that snow would fall as rain instead, then I think the lack of snow cover across Siberia in the fall could amplify winter warming.

I particularly enjoyed the slides that, when combined (1) provided an overview of hotter and cooler CO2 molecules as it relates to how they are seen from outer space and from profile — because this will make it easier for me to explain this process to others; (2) walked through the volcanic and solar activity vs assigning importance to CO2 changes — because this another way to help make it clearer, too, but in another way; (3) discussed CO2 induced warming and ocean rise vs different choices we might make — because this helps point out why every day's delay matters; and (4) showed Figure 1 from William Nordhaus» «Strategies for Control of Carbon Dioxide» and then super-imposed upon that the global mean temperature in colors showing pre-paper and post-paper periods — because this helps to show just how far back it was possible to make reasoned projections without the aid of a more nuanced and modern understanding.

I do understand that the solar energy - in dictates the earthly energy - out at equilibrium at the balance point at the Top Of Atmosphere (~ 10,000 m) and that unless the solar - in changes then the law of conservation of energy requires that the Stefan - Boltzman derived 255 K temperature at equilibrium at this balance point can not change.

I assume that the ultimate atmospheric temperature is then dictated (approximately) by the ideal gas law, PV = nRT at the different elevations, and pegged to ~ 255 K at the ~ 10,000 m TOA energy balance point.

Then there is more heat to warm all that ice, first to melting point and then to the average temperature of the ocThen there is more heat to warm all that ice, first to melting point and then to the average temperature of the octhen to the average temperature of the ocean.

If either the photons have precisely the same energy, and / or are emitted at precisely the same time from precisely the same location in precisely the same direction, or otherwise are emitted so that they end up in the same direction passing the same point at the same time, then the brightness temperature would be infinity.

If he can use interglacial cycles to address the role of natural forcings in explaining the recent increases in temperature, then I propose to use black holes to refute his point about interglacial cycles.

If we may assume that the moving speed of a breaking up point of a glacier is a good indication for past temperatures, then have a look at the retreat of the largest Greenland glacier at Illulisat, West Greenland.

Then I point out that raising that altitude is like lifting the temperature profile over Death Valley and setting it at the valley edge.

The main problem I have with Michaels is while he reasonably points out the limitations of climate models for forecasting the next one hundred years, he then confidently makes his own forecast of warming continuing at the same rate as for the last thirty years, leading to a 2 degree increase in global temperature.

Using 1880 - 1900 as a base point, the temperature series would depart more in 2017 then using 1981 - 2010 as the base.

However, if the air continues to cool below freezing point then, although the nett flow of heat from the water is greater while the water is in the process of freezing, the air temperature does not rise and will continue to tend to fall, albeit at a slower rate.

Then the atmospheric temperature starts dropping and, because the thermal capacity of the water is much greater than that of the air, we soon reach the point where the water temperature is greater than the air temperature, even if it was colder to start with.

Once the Arctic temperatures do increase, then the melting ice = increased albedo and melting permafrost = release of methane theories of tipping points is played.

If there is no inflection point, then the slope has to be the opposite sign across the entire temperature regime.

If the measured temperatures at the two points on that day were say 12 and 17 deg C, then the system's estimated temperatures would use the model with its ends shifted up or down to match the start and end points:

Anyway, regarding his comment, McIntyre comes perilously close to understanding Wahl and Ammann's point about Bristlecone proxies but then suddenly recalls that the NAS panel said that Bristlecone proxies «should be «avoided» in temperature reconstructions».

I like to keep things simple, so you take the three points of the triangle in the model as representing a flat triangle, move the triangle corners to match the three measured temperatures, then place each point within the triangle at the same distance above or below the triangle as it is in the model.

If the air temperature starts rising then the rate of heat flow from the water to the air slows down and the water consequently stops freezing, so the latent energy falls and so the temperature tends to stabilize at that point.

Suppose that somewhere between two points there is an urb so that the model between the two points looks like this: Then suppose that on a given day the temperatures as measured at the two points are 12 and 13 deg C and that there are no measurements from the urb or anywhere else in between the two points.

They will point you to a regional event during the middle ages, call it the MWP, and then compare it to global average temperature today.

But if we can continue to reduce NOx — by targeting industrial emissions and improving agricultural efficiencies — then at some point the effect of temperature won't matter, because high O3 levels can not occur in the absence of substantial NOx concentrations.

lolwot, if the PDO is a cycle, then at some point in the next 5 to 15 years, we should change over to a cycle of increasing temperatures.

to be consistent, either we should have 100 points measuring the temperature on a specific hour of the day on mountains and in the ocean, and no average world temperature, or we should do the same with CO2, measure high for the day, low for the day, average, and make a global average from many regions, and then define an anomaly on the same interval as the temperature anomaly in order to be consistent.

Gohmert then brought up a talking point he» sused before, falsely claiming that somewhat higher temperatures in Greenland during the Viking age mean that climate change is a myth.

The way i see it we could have one of those LED jumbo screens somewhere in London, with the TV camera pointed at the beach, and current conditions (we already have one on the Internet), then we add two sets of information, «water temperature in 30 days» and «water temperature in 60 days».