Sentences with phrase «points bookings do»

Points bookings do not include taxes, fees, and other government / airport charges of at least $ 5.60 per one way flight

At other points the book didn't quite seem to have enough information, such as only having two pages devoted the entire of Noble Team, offering very little background information of the Spartans who gave up their lives on Reach.

Not exact matches

The entire book is far too unwieldy at this point to try to do all in one place.

But as bestselling author and Oprah - anointed happiness expert Shawn Achor pointed out on in an excerpt from his new book on the TED Ideas blog recently, that sort of praise — well intentioned as it might be — actually does more harm than good.

A clear summary of your points is possibly the best thing you can do to not just deliver value to the reader, but also make the book memorable, which helps you sell more books.

This book is a good jumping off point to explain to your son that men don't grow beards because they look cool or virile, but because shaving is a huge pain in the ass that you will have to commit to every morning for the rest of your natural life.

If people repeatedly come to you with requests in areas where you don't feel adequately qualified to help, having a few stock resources, such as books or articles, to point them to can ease the pain of saying no, Grant suggests.

You might not be thinking about what books, articles or speeches to create, but there has probably been a point in time where you have talked yourself out of pursuing something, because you convinced yourself that you lack a certain level of creativity that it takes to get the job done.

Then, whenever someone asked me for advice, instead of telling them I didn't have time, or trying to sell them on coaching or consulting they couldn't afford, I could point them to the book.

In the 2003 book «Sexual Selections: What We Can and Can't Learn about Sex from Animals,» the biologist Marlene Zuk points out that social groups of hens do have «pecking orders.»

If you don't complete a book, you run the risk of missing key points or leaving gaps in your understanding.

While I credit books like E-Myth by Michael Gerber as true turning points for me, the book doesn't always have to be on a standard business topic.

«You shouldn't view your education as a done deal,» advises a fun sketchbook of the book's main points.

With millions of copies sold on Amazon alone, it seems folks gladly took a break from their ball - point pens and to - do lists for a set of colored pencils and an «age - appropriate» coloring book.

While Gates does differ on certain «secondary points and policy prescriptions» offered by Piketty, he agrees with the book's basic premise: «that inequality is a growing problem and governments should play a role in reducing it.»

Thomas points out that, not only does this natural ebb and flow sound delightful, it also results in an impressive level of productivity (a book a year is a hefty output by any writer's standards).

Thanks to these selling points, FreshDirect is doing well — booking about $ 240 million a year — but I sometimes wonder why it isn't doing even better.

This is one of the most rewarding among travel cards, even if all you do is use its Ultimate Rewards points to book travel directly through Chase's website.

Dell's net cash, its finance business at book value and the cost of recent acquisitions, which Dell says are doing well, add up to almost $ 13 a share, as Southeastern points out.

«This book inspires readers to talk about what moves them — their heart and soul — while also outlining key points on how to do it effectively.

Given your belief that Berkshire's intrinsic value continues to exceed its book value with the difference continuing to widen over time, are we at a point where it makes sense to consider buying back stock at a higher break point that Berkshire currently has in place and would you ever consider stepping in buying back shares that did dip down below 1.2 times book value per share even if that prior years» figure had not yet been released?

200 + Podcasts, 100 + Articles, 20 + Books... In 11 Bullet Points — Life Learning 200 + Podcasts, 100 + Articles, 20 + Books... In 11 Bullet Points For the past 8 months, I have spent my time doing what I've wanted to do for years: listening to podcasts, reading books, and reading artiBooks... In 11 Bullet Points — Life Learning 200 + Podcasts, 100 + Articles, 20 + Books... In 11 Bullet Points For the past 8 months, I have spent my time doing what I've wanted to do for years: listening to podcasts, reading books, and reading artiBooks... In 11 Bullet Points For the past 8 months, I have spent my time doing what I've wanted to do for years: listening to podcasts, reading books, and reading artibooks, and reading articles.

Although people understood the rules of open book management, at first they didn't see the point of adding yet another meeting to their busy schedules.

Would you care to explain how it is that «primitive sheep herders» as most of you love to derogatorily call them were able to in and of themselves write scripture such that the first two books Genesis & Exodus spell TORAH = LAW for every equidistant letter sequence of the 50th letter... and does the same backwards HAROT for Numbers & Deuteronomy, and the 3rd book that they're pointing towards Leviticus, every 7th letter (7 is God's number for perfection) spells YHWH = The name of God.

hey chut — we don't care how many comedians may know the cardinal direction of mecca while on stage as they shuffle for a laugh - something about your holy book espousing slavery or death to non-believers is really more the point of contention.

= > no fiction book ever says that I pointed out the text analysis that person did to juxtapose it with the authenticity of the biblical narrative.

I will not enter that debate here, except to say that the reflections on memory that dominate Book X have everything to do with the story that Augustine has been telling to that point.

Like the good Dr. has pointed out, using your book to refute someone elses book when both have the same historical significance, outlandish claims and religion is probably the dumbest thing you can do.

The reality is that we all get our morals from our parents and our society, whether they have their ultimate base in a book or not doesn't really matter at this point.

Jesus didn't die according to your book, so what's the point?

Don't misunderstand me; some evolutionists (particularly some of the neo-atheists like Richard Dawkins, who argues in his new book people who don't believe in evolution are on the same level as Holocaust deniers) have gone ape over their theory (forgive the pun) to the point that they seem to forget it is a theory, and refer to it as if it is an undeniable scientific fact.

As a reader trying to be charitable, I face an unattractive choice: accept that His Eminence does hold the mistaken view that mercy is essential to God; or assume that when he emphatically made the multiple important statements at key points in his book that mercy is essential to God, he didn't mean them.

Darrel Falk, former president of the BioLogos Foundation and a biology professor at Point Loma Nazarene University, reviewed the book and used it as an example of why he does not support the intelligent design movement.

TheLies» comment above about your post as usual conveniently ignores the critical point that crimes done by Stalin et al were not done under any guidance of atheism, whereas the guidance to do the many atrocities that Christians have done can be found in the many horrific instructions «from god» presented in the Christian book of nasty AKA the bible.

I don't know what's more amusing, your assumptions about all atheists, or your attempt to quote a book they don't believe in to make your point.

Later, I did a whole series on «Gospelism» (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6) in which I argue many of the points that Scot McKnight made in his book, but which he referred to as «Gospeling.»

I did also want to point out a couple of other books by L.M. Montgomery you might not have heard about but feature excellent heroines: Emily of New Moon (who was Madeleine L'Engle's favourite) and Jane of Lantern Hill.

I do think he is off in several points, but I just found this book to be unreadable.

Neville you are right in that sense that the holy spirit or anti christ is not mentioned however the whole book is about the return of Jesus and the rise of the anti christ so it is logical to believe that the one being restrained is the man of sin or anti christ.I believe it is the anti christ and the restrainer is the holy spirit that is working through believers.It comes down to personal belief but This article covers all the options http://www.biblestudytools.com/commentaries/revelation/related-topics/who-is-the-restrainer.html What do you believe about preaching the Gospel to all nations and then the Lord will return at this point in time i believe there is around 2000 unreached people groups.brentnz

Hoever, I do like Haddon Robinson's book (old version) where he makes the same point you make.

Hence pointing out that even Bart Ehrman (who does happen to be a self - proclaimed agnostic, something rare — if not anti.thetical — among conservative ranks) has written a book («Did Jesus Exist?»)

For what Davies seems to be doing in this book, and in all his fiction since Fifth Business, is catching the reader's attention through marvels of storytelling to bring him or her to the point of undertaking a similar journey toward individuation.

We could point to examples of semantic structure, grammatical style, references to culture, and a whole host of other historical critical standards to prove by scholarly consensus that the author whose name is on the book did not actually write it.

I do want to point out, and I hope I do not confuse you by saying this, that Esther is sinning in this book.

Arkes agrees, but that's precisely the point of his book, which Prof. Smolin simply does not get: when racists appeal to natural law to justify slavery and white supremacy they employ principles that undercut their own rights.

As a matter of fact, there doesn't exist any book that has evidence and guidance like the Quran in the world today (and up until this point).

And, as Jean - Louis Brindamour, who developed Pyramid Publications» religious program, points out, «The phenomenal growth of sales so far tells us that time and a determined public will eventually force even greater space for such books where they do not yet appear.»

I really like McLaren and Compolo's book — adventures in missing the point — because that's what I feel we've been... and still are... doing.

Although there are other points in Neville's provocative article which perhaps ought to be taken up, I do not feel that this response should become another book!

I have reached the point that I simply can not buy any more new «dead tree» books because I simply do not have the space to put them!