Sentences with phrase «police conduct violated»

Police conduct violated both Mr. Figueiras» right to travel unimpeded on a public highway (sidewalk is considered public highway under the common law) and his right to freedom of expression under the Charter.

Not exact matches

• A 19 - year - old Orland Park male who received an oral warning for dancing atop a vehicle and playing loud music outside his home was charged with violating a local disorderly conduct ordinance for yelling obscenities and threats May 26 after he thought police had left.

According to the Director of Public Affairs of the Central Regional Police Command, ASP Irene Oppong, «She [the female student] said: «The man never raped me», so now it's up to the Ghana Education Service (GES) to take over and also investigate if there is any code of conduct that the man has violated.»

«Allegations that Mr. Grant violated the police code of conduct do not support a conviction of a federal crime,» said John Meringolo, who represents Grant.

Wilful police conduct that violates an individual's constitutional rights should be severely punished.

On appeal, he argued that his s. 8 Charter rights had been violated when the police officer conducted a pat - down search, which the majority of the Court of Appeal dismissed.

A 4 - 3 majority held that the Calgary Police Service did not violate section 8 of the Charter by the manner in which it conducted a «dynamic» or «no - knock entry» search of an accused person's home.

At the original trial, the man argued that the police had violated his constitutional rights when they conducted the search.

''... «The message is police can't have shortcuts, violate people's rights by conducting illegal searches», said Kim's lawyer, Leora Shemesh.

In R v Edwards, the Supreme Court of Canada offered the following two - part framework to determine whether s. 8 of the Charter has been violated in a search conducted by the police: [1]

Third, and at issue here, is the attenuation doctrine: Evidence is admissible when the connection between unconstitutional police conduct and the evidence is remote or has been interrupted by some intervening circumstance, so that «the interest protected by the constitutional guarantee that has been violated would not be served by suppression of the evidence obtained.»

Police officers are entitled to qualified immunity from suit; a plaintiff must show that the officers» conduct violated «clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.»