Not exact matches
James A. Edmonds • Member, IPCC Steering Committee on «New Integrated
Scenarios» (2006 -
present) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Framing Issues,» IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (2007) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Global, Regional, and National Costs and Ancillary Benefits of Mitigation,» IPCC Third Assessment Report (2001) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Decision - Making Frameworks,» IPCC Third Assessment Report (2001) • Lead Author, Working Group III, Summary for
Policy Makers, IPCC Third Assessment Report (2001) • Lead Author, Working Group II, «Energy Supply Mitigation Options,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, Working Group II, «Mitigation: Cross-Sectoral and Other Issues,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Estimating the Costs of Mitigating Greenhouse Gases,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «A Review of Mitigation Cost Studies,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, Working Group III, «Integrated Assessment of Climate Change: An Overview and Comparison of Approaches and Results,» IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) • Lead Author, IPCC Special Report, Climate Change 1994: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change and An Evaluation of the IPCC IS92 Emission
Scenarios (1994) • Lead Author, IPCC Special Report, Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment (1992) • Major contributor, IPCC First Assessment Report, Working Group III, Response Strategies Working Group (1991).
Regionalization, a chief concern of the mayors, ironically
presented a way to address what those on the
policy side had dubbed «the bad - mayor
scenario.»
The
scenarios presented in this book show how alternative
policies of education expansion in the near term, mostly through their effect on the future educational attainment of young women, can significantly influence the medium to long term paths of population growth for individual countries and the world as a whole.
If the IEA is uncertain about the prospects of the investments required by its Reference
Scenario being financed in developing countries, is there any real likelihood that the funds and infrastructure will be forthcoming to support two or three times the investment in power supply and distribution that the Agency is predicting on the basis of
present policies?
Present policy probably sits somewhere between these two
scenarios.
Minister Kent did explicitly credit strong provincial
policies, and those are modeled into the
scenarios presented.
Based on the model outputs from 1960 to the
present, policymakers and the public would be better served by rejecting the alarmist
scenarios A and B; instead, moving forward, base all adaption and mitigation
policies on
Scenario «C», which would likely produce better outcomes with superior allocation of scarce resources.
Presenting the New
Policies scenarios — including its unrealistic assumptions on renewable energy — as the reference
scenario inevitably affects
policy makers who will base their measures and
policy designs on the WEO.
It insists on
presenting the New
Policies scenario as the central one.
It
presents three
scenarios: the New
Policies Scenario, the Current
Policies Scenario and the Sustainable Development
Scenario.
Policy analysts have input radiative forcing into simple climate models, which are used to examine a wide range of
scenarios of past,
present, and future climate.
I might add that it isn't pointed out often enough that the science (read IPCC)
presents a range of
scenarios as decision support to
policy, not a single outcome.
The policyholder, in such a
scenario, needs to
present the original documents and papers related to the treatment, such as bills, to the insurer and inform them about the hospitalization according to the terms and conditions of the
policy.
In the
present scenario, in case you or your spouse lose your job due to the economic downturn, auto insurance companies will still nail you with a hike in premiums or even cancel your
policy.