Sentences with phrase «poor rear crash protection»
Poor rear crash protection: Honda Accord 4dr, Infiniti M35, Nissan Quest, and Toyota Avalon and Sienna
http://www.iihs.org/ Not exact matches
The IIHS rated the Sentra an» «acceptable»» for frontal off - set crash test, a» «poor»» for side impact, and a» «poor»» for rear crash protection and head restraint.
Protection in side impacts improves, but most cars tested still afford marginal or poor protection in reProtection in side impacts improves, but most cars tested still afford marginal or poor protection in reprotection in rear crashes
IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests, a roof strength test for rollover protection, plus evaluations of seats / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
The other 8 models are rated marginal or poor for rear crash protection.
IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in a moderate overlap frontal crash, small overlap frontal crash, side impact and rollover, plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
IIHS rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on performance in a moderate overlap frontal crash, small overlap frontal crash, side impact and rollover, as well as evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
Instead, rear crash protection is rated acceptable, marginal, or poor (Honda reports that the seat / head restraints in the only Civic model with electronic stability control wouldn't be rated good).
But rear crash protection is rated acceptable, marginal, or poor.
The Fusion without optional side airbags is rated poor for side crash protection, and it earned a marginal rating for rear crash protection.
The Institute rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal, or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.
It earned a poor rating in the side test and a marginal rating for rear crash protection.
Seat / head restraint designs in 22 current car models are rated good for rear crash protection, but those in 53 other cars are rated marginal or poor.
The Institute rates vehicles good, acceptable, marginal, or poor based on performance in high - speed front and side crash tests plus evaluations of seat / head restraints for protection against neck injuries in rear impacts.