Sentences with phrase «posted as a rebuttal»

Posted as a rebuttal to a 2011 Science paper reporting that a strain of Halomonas bacteria from a Californian lake could incorporate arsenic into its DNA4, the preprint appeared on the server in January5 before its publication in Science this month6.

Not exact matches

The Washington Post blog was ultimately revised with an editor's note: «The post occasioned three rebuttals (here, here and here) as well as a response from the authPost blog was ultimately revised with an editor's note: «The post occasioned three rebuttals (here, here and here) as well as a response from the authpost occasioned three rebuttals (here, here and here) as well as a response from the authors.

And while The Passive Voice shared a number of graphs on author earnings that were compiled by AuthorEarnings.com, it was the rebuttal post by Joshua Blimes of JABberwocky lit agency that trashes any concept behind Howey's questioning post, calling out the author's summation as a means to discredit the argument.

Rahmstorf added another RealClimate post today on a new graph created by his colleagues at the German KlimaLounge blog as a visual rebuttal to a graph created in 2009 by Anthony Watts, the online aggregator of anything questioning the significance of global warming:

Later that day, Gavin accepted the comment (now posted up as # 44 and bearing the date - time stamp of Oct. 28 9:18 a.m.) I am pleased to learn that the posting delays for my post were simply due to it being the weekend and not due to any intent on Gavin's part to suppress «serious discussion or rebuttals».

As a result, on Saturday morning, I posted the above thread, in which I asked questions about the authenticity of Gavin's commitment to «welcoming serious discussion and rebuttal» `?

He writes basic level rebuttals and occasional blog posts for Skeptical Science, motivated in part by a concern for the environment, and partly as a counter-reaction to the demagoguery and disinformation that pervades the public discourse on climate science.

As the description says, many of the posts take to task the published arguments of global warming skeptics and these rebuttals help to sharpen one's climate science reasoning and logic.

As I recall our long exchange started on a «Harmless Sky» blog with a post by David Whitehouse (on the «pause in warming»), followed by a rebuttal by Mark Lynas.

I will note your own unparalleled act of bravery, as to a James Delingpole post on on December 22, 2009, you waited until January 4, 2010 to courageously drop a link in the comments to your «rebuttal» under the pseudonym «Mr. Stoaty».

This post has been adapted into the rebuttal to the argument «Earth hasn't warmed as much as expected».

A thought experiment: the prosecution call Prof Lindzen or Roy Spencer as a rebuttal witness — should they be removed from their accademic posts if they agree to testify?

However, as you can see by reading carefully through the 561 comments on the Montford post to which the current post is a rebuttal, Gavin has declined to extend the discussion at RC and has not posted follow up comments from a number of substantive and polite commentaters here.

Note: this post has been incorporated into the new rebuttal to the myth «No long tail means climate sensitivity is low», as well as «global warming stopped in [insert date]» and «Trenberth can't account for the lack of warming».

Regarding Trenberth, having looked at the slides, I don't see Roger's interpretation, personally, but on the other hand I don't find his accusation of «recklessness» nearly as ad - hom as Eli's quite sarcastic and personal rebuttal post.

Thursday, July 24, 10:49 AM: Monckton responds with the «rebuttal» article, as he posted to his website and Eli linked to above, with my article included in full, and a prefatory statement that it was from «Dr. Arthur Smith, American Physical Society», which was not in the original.