Sentences with phrase «posting on safe withdrawal rates»

Why not enjoy the benefits of that instead of arguing over whether honest posting on safe withdrawal rates should be permitted?

I say that permitting honest posting on safe withdrawal rates and scores of other critically important investment - related topics is the FIRST step, not the last step, Drip Guy.

The main event is the finding that we can reduce the risk of stock investing for millions of middle - class people by 70 percent just by opening the internet to honest posting on safe withdrawal rates and other critically important investment - related topics.

The effort to open the internet up to honest posting on safe withdrawal rates and scores of other critically important topics is an effort that will never end until we have brought the economic crisis to an end and we are all enjoying the greatest economic boom in U.S. history.

We need to open every discussion board and blog on the internet to honest posting on safe withdrawal rates and many other critically important investment - related topics.

Speak out against the Ban on Honest Posting on Safe Withdrawal Rates and Other Critically Important Investment - Related...

Not exact matches

I want to make it clear that none of this post should be construed as a personal attack on the authors of various Safe Withdrawal Rate studies.

This post has been on my mind from day one and it's also been a topic that was requested by readers in response to previous installments in the Safe Withdrawal Rate Series (click here for Part 1):

I absolutely agree with your comment on safe withdrawal rates, and I have an upcoming post on that very topic.

I was reading on Kitces.com and really enjoyed his post on Adjusting Safe Withdrawal Rates To The Retiree's Time Horizon.

I pray that I never let those people down by agreeing to post dishonestly on safe withdrawal rates or on any other critically important investment - related topic.

You want me to agree to post dishonestly on safe withdrawal rates and on other important investing topics.

They understand the stakes of permitting honest posting on something like safe withdrawal rates or the Plan B gibberish (even if they do not possess a full understanding of the investing realities).

What I will say is that you will never scare me enough to persuade me to post dishonestly on safe withdrawal rates.

Here are some great posts for newbies: May Highlights Always Insist on a baseline TIPS Table The Rule of 25 Safe Withdrawal Rates with Switching Pay special attention to these two posts.

A great series of posts by ERN who has a PhD in economics has 23 posts on current thinking on Safe Withdrawal Rates and is -LSB-...]

I will continue to post honestly on what the historical data says re safe withdrawal rates in any event.

I put up my famous post pointing out the errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies on the morning of May 13, 2002, Sensible.

I was banned from [FWF] because I posted honestly on safe withdrawal rates and other important investing topics.

I will continue to post honestly on safe withdrawal rates and on many other important investment - related topics.

«I put up my famous post pointing out the errors in the Old School safe withdrawal rate studies on the morning of May 13, 2002, How many of the Old School studies would you say have been corrected in the 12 years since?»

If it bothers you that I have a long history of posting honestly on safe withdrawal rates, then it bothers you that I have a long history of posting honestly on safe withdrawal rates.

Motley Fool, the site at which I posted my famous post of May 13, 2002, pointing out the errors in the Old School safe - withdrawal - rate studies (SWRs) and which for years now has prohibited honest posting on SWRs (after John Greaney, the author of one of the discredited retirements...

A fellow going by the name «SWR Lover» has posted a comment to Tuesday's blog entry on the Bogleheads wiki statement on safe withdrawal rates (SWRs), saying that he is the author.

As someone who enjoyed a friendship with you prior to the fateful day when I dared to be the first to post honestly on safe withdrawal rates and also as someone who cares about the millions of middle - class workers who hopes for their financial futures have been destroyed by the Buy - and - Hold Crisis, I see it as a win / win / win.

But as of today, based on everything I have seen go down during the first nine years of The Great Safe Withdrawal Rate Debate, I believe that I am under an obligation to my many good friends in all the communities to try to get the possibility of honest posting on SWRs and many other important topics opened to us again.

Our old friend Ed Easterling has published a new book that takes on «the mostly silly [Old School] research on safe withdrawal rates,» according to John Mauldin, who posted an excerpt from the book at his site.

I've posted comments at the Free Money Finance blog on a number of occasions, helping my fellow community members come to a better understanding of the errors in the Old School Safe Withdrawal Rate Studies and explaining in general why the discredited Passive Investing model for understanding how stocks work needs to be replaced with the Rational Model.

Yes, I will continue posting honestly on safe withdrawal rates and on many other critically important investment - related topics.