Sentences with phrase «premise liability statute»

In 2004, in Vigil v. Franklin, the Colorado Supreme Court held that the premise liability statute was the sole remedy available against a landowner for injuries sustained on land.

Most states have a premises liability statute that provides the duty of care owed by the landowner to others on their property.

In Colorado, this statute is the Colorado Premises Liability statute, C.R.S. § 13-21-115.

Most states have a premises liability statute, which provides the duty of care owed by a landowner.

Not exact matches

At a quick glance at the black letter law, the above provision of statute would suggest that you don't need liability coverage on your Winston - Salem renters insurance because accidental damaged to the demised premises (your apartment) isn't your problem and you can't be held liable for it.

He also handles cases involving the defense of claims for premises liability, breach of contract, negligence, gross negligence, and violations of consumer protection statutes.

'' [P] unitive damages are not recoverable when liability is premised solely on the employer's violation of the Labor Code statutes that regulate meal and rest breaks, pay stubs, and minimum wage laws.»

On March 30, 2018, Judge Rya Zobel of the United States District Court (District of Massachusetts) issued a memorandum of decision on two Defendants» (NSTAR Electric, formerly Boston Edison, and General Electric) Motions for Summary Judgment in an asbestos personal injury and wrongful death matter, June Stearns and Clifford Stearns as Co-Executors of the Estate of Wayne Oliver v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., et al., that addresses multiple issues, including statute of repose, strict liability and liability of a premises owner.

If you are attacked or bitten by someone else's dog in the Dallas - Fort Worth area, you need to know that Texas has no specific dog bite statute, but you may be entitled to recover compensation through a premises liability or personal injury lawsuit.

Earlier this month, an appellate court in Oregon issued a written opinion in a premises liability case filed against a city employee, holding that the employee was not entitled to immunity under that state's «recreational use» statute.

At a quick glance at the black letter law, the above provision of statute would suggest that you don't need liability coverage on your Winston - Salem renters insurance because accidental damaged to the demised premises (your apartment) isn't your problem and you can't be held liable for it.