Not exact matches
Obama Secretly Laid Out Why Climate Skeptics Are Bad For Democracy Former
President Barack Obama said while
debating climate change policy solutions is good for democracy, questioning the underlying science is bad for
society.
This view has been echoed in the UK by Royal
Society president Paul Nurse, as well as in the House of Lords during a
debate on the proposed Protection of Freedoms legislation.
In
debating education reform, Goodman adopted not the point of view of The System, even less that of
society or the nation (in one recurring riff, he savagely criticizes James Conant, Harvard
president and education reformer, for even mentioning «national needs» alongside «individual development»), but that of the dropout, The System's rejects.
With help from Professor Randall Abate and their co-sponsor, the Federalist
Society, they presented The Legal Battle on Personhood
Debate, featuring Steve Wise,
president of the Nonhuman Rights Project, and Bob Kohn, fellow at the Center for Great Ideas.
Like his predecessors, however, Nurse fails to understand why partial statements from the
president of the Royal
Society do more to impede the progress of
debate than move it on.
HANNITY: When the
president says the
debate is settled, when the secretary of state says that we're not going to — we have no time for a meeting with the Flat Earth
Society — five years ago, Al Gore predicted the north polar ice cap would be completely ice - free.
It's like an astronomer getting into a
debate with the
president of the Flat Earth
Society over the latest stellar observations.
I mean if, as Nurse is now suggesting, the scientific mainstream understanding of global warming is that it's happening but that it's open to
debate how significant it is then doesn't this completely contradict pretty much everything he, the Royal
Society, and its two previous
presidents Lords Rees and May have been doing this last decade or more to stoke up the Anthropogenic Global Warming scare for all they're worth?
And their way of looking at the world exists outside of the climate
debate, which brings us back to the Royal
Society, and what it and its
presidents were trying to do with their scientific authority.
As
president of the Law
Society of England and Wales from July she will be at the forefront of
debates with the Ministry of Justice and HM Courts and Tribunals Service over the government's plans for online justice.