Paul A. Schilpp (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1941), pp. 563 - 618; Lynne Belaief, «Whitehead and
Private Interest Theories,» Ethics 76/4 (July, 1966): 277 - 86; and WMP.
Lynne Belaief's discussion, «Whitehead and
Private Interest Theories,» in the July 1966 Ethics purports to present the foundational elements of a Whiteheadian ethical theory.
Not exact matches
It is ultimately dependent upon an analysis of the self as some sort of self - enclosed independently existing entity and produces precisely the difficulty for ethics that has been erroneously attributed to Whitehead, namely that his ethics would be a
private -
interest theory, at best.1 But Whitehead clearly repudiates the contributing analysis of the self, which would be «no more original than a stone» (PR 159), and repudiates its consequences for ethics: «The doctrine of minds, as independent substances, leads directly not merely to
private worlds of experience, but also to
private worlds of morals.
(PANW 435 - 59); for a refutation of the
private - interest attribution, see L. Belaief, «Whitehead and Private - Interest Theories,» in Ethics, 56/4 (July, 1966) 27
private -
interest attribution, see L. Belaief, «Whitehead and Private - Interest Theories,» in Ethics, 56/4 (July, 1966) 2
interest attribution, see L. Belaief, «Whitehead and
Private - Interest Theories,» in Ethics, 56/4 (July, 1966) 27
Private -
Interest Theories,» in Ethics, 56/4 (July, 1966) 2
Interest Theories,» in Ethics, 56/4 (July, 1966) 277 - 86.
The 1980s African debt crisis was created by a variety of factors (much more complex than the commonly attributed «poor African leadership»
theory), including irresponsible over-lending by
private creditors seeking high returns, the tendency towards one product commodity economies, the targeting of developing countries for high
interest loans, the global monetary shock of 1979 - 81, trade protectionism in Northern countries, the depreciation of the US dollar, the prolonged drought of 1981 - 84, among other factors (see African Debt Revisited).
Opportunities to participate in musical ensembles,
private lessons and music
theory instruction are offered after school on a fee basis subject to scholar
interest.
Possible topics about pedagogy include: • Structuring statutory drafting courses • Simulation courses designed using mock legislatures or committees • Course linkages with real - world legislators and special
interest organizations • Service learning or clinical opportunities for law students • Courses focused on law reform efforts • How to employ Plain - English principles in statutory and rule drafting • Theoretical perspectives on statutory drafting • Involving political realities in law school drafting courses • Teaching practical aspects of drafting that addresses
theories and principles of statutory interpretation and construction Possible topics about practice include: • Unique challenges of drafting laws and / or regulations in specific areas such as criminal law, environmental, health law, etc. • Lawyering for non-profits, federal and state agencies, local governments, and other clients in frequent need of rule - drafting • Practicing in employment law, health law, environmental law, and other heavily regulated fields where
private clients require rule and policy drafting • Non-legal drafting opportunities, such as sports league rules, industry trade group policies, and university rules Possible topics about politics include: • Political influences affecting legislative drafting • Direct democracy and the unique challenges of drafting initiatives and referenda • The implications of special
interests driving drafting decisions • Polictics and its influence on legislative history • Lobbyists as legislative drafters.
This article does not ask whether this core of the regulatory apple is healthy or not, and it does not evaluate the public
interest theory as an explanatory alternative to the
private interest / market control
theory.
[iv] This
private interest (or «market control»)
theory of regulation has some adherents within the legal community, of whom Richard Abel is perhaps best known.
He is
interested in learning more about
theories / models of therapy such as DBT, CBT, and EMDR, as well as learning about other areas of therapy (working with different populations, insurances,
private practice, county, etc.).
Registered as both an integrative and a psychodynamic psychotherapist, with over twenty - eight years in
private practice in London and psychotherapy teaching, John combines a long - standing
interest in traditional relational psychotherapeutic approaches and Attachment
Theory with Bioenergetic Analysis and other body and energy - based psychotherapies.