Sentences with phrase «product liability litigation defendants»

Robert F. Wagner: Personal Injury Litigation — Defendants; Product Liability Litigation Defendants

Adam Peck — Environmental Litigation, Personal Injury Litigation Defendants, and Product Liability Litigation Defendants

The Best Lawyers in America by Woodward White, Inc. listed Banks as the «2016 Birmingham Lawyer of the Year for Product Liability Litigation Defendants»

Not exact matches

Our trial litigation practice includes representation of defendants in personal injury and premises liability matters, product liability claims and wrongful death claims.

David Marshall specializes in representing defendants in product liability litigation, including toxic torts, and long - term care facilities, assisted living facilities and related specialties.

Best Lawyers of America, Lawyer of the Year, Product Liability Litigation — Defendant, Orange County (2014)

We focus on building key relationships with law firms and managing legal affairs as best we can and the type of legal work that Navistar Canada is involved in doesn't really warrant a large department because it's defendant - side litigation on the product liability side and some corporate - driven transactions, be it tax or finance, that are not routine.

John F. Mariani, Commercial Litigation, Product Liability Litigation — Defendants, Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions — Defendants

Two of the firm's partners were selected as «Lawyers of the Year» in their practice area: John F. Mariani in West Palm Beach for Product Liability Litigation — Defendants and Dilip Patel for Immigration Law.

A frequent speaker on topics including trial strategy, expert witnesses, product liability, and accident reconstruction, Mr. Craft has appeared on television, radio, and in several major newspapers across the country discussing distracted driving, discovery abuse by defendants, vehicle rollovers, roof crush, seatbelts, child restraint systems, airbags, back - over deaths, and other litigation topics.

Dina M. Cox: Product Liability Litigation - Defendants; Professional Malpractice Law — Defendants

Mr. Simmons has represented plaintiffs and defendants in complex tort litigation, product liability litigation, and commercial litigation throughout Texas and nationally.

V. L. Woolston (2007)- Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions - Defendants; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants

James H. Gidley (2003)- Bet - the - Company Litigation; Commercial Litigation; Product Liability Litigation - Defendants

Ken Rhodes — Personal Injury Litigation for Defendants, Personal Injury Litigation for Plaintiffs, Product Liability Litigation for Defendants

Blackwell Burke P.A. has been included on the 2016 list with a ranking of Metropolitan Tier 1 for Products Liability Litigation — Defendant, and a Tier 2 ranking under Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions — Defendants.

Commercial Litigation Product Liability Litigation - Defendants Product Liability Litigation - Plaintiffs

In drug and device product liability litigation, discovery burdens are unequal and fall more heavily on defendants, and there is no reason to think that will change under the MIDPP.

He typically represents defendants in products liability, toxic exposure, and other tort cases, often in complex litigation.

In addition, he has handled personal injury and commercial litigation matters for plaintiffs and defendants, contractual and employment disputes, construction cases, product liability cases, sexual misconduct cases, as well as assorted other professional negligence claims (accounting and legal).

(1) extending negligent misrepresentation beyond «business transactions» to product liability, unprecedented in Texas; (2) ignoring multiple US Supreme Court decisions that express and implied preemption operate independently (as discussed here) to dismiss implied preemption with nothing more than a cite to the Medtronic v. Lohr express preemption decision; (3) inventing some sort of state - law tort to second - guess the defendant following one FDA marketing approach (§ 510k clearance) over another (pre-market approval), unprecedented anywhere; (4) holding that the learned intermediary rule does not apply whenever a defendant «compensates» or «incentivizes» physicians to use its products, absent any Texas state or appellate authority; (5) imposing strict liability on an entity not in the product's chain of sale, contrary to Texas statute (§ 82.001 (2)-RRB-; (6) creating a claim for «tortious interference» with the physician - patient relationship, again utterly unprecedented; (7) creating «vicarious» breach of fiduciary duty for engaging doctors to serve as expert witnesses in mass tort litigation also involving their patients, ditto; and (8) construing a consulting agreement with a physician as «commercial bribery» to avoid the Texas cap on punitive damages, jaw - droppingly unprecedented.

products liability and complex commercial litigation cases Represented both plaintiffs and defendants in virtualt...