However, I am bold enough to suggest that
the Protestant liberal tradition has a message that needs to be reaffirmed today.
Not exact matches
Many of the great
Liberal Protestant teachers of the
tradition in the last generation have become disillusioned by the loss of their cherished conceptions of critical inquiry, courtesy, and academic standards.
Given all that, it is perhaps surprising that 55 percent of the
Protestant congregations we studied — slightly more among conservatives, slightly less among
liberals — report that they consider themselves strong standard - bearers of their denominational
tradition.
Yoder needs to be read in the
tradition of
liberal Protestantism not only because he helps us recognize the strengths of that
tradition, but also because he helps us see why that
tradition has come to an end (which accounts for why he remains something of an outcast in mainstream
Protestant theology).
Nevertheless, both the Catholic
tradition and conservative Protestantism strike certain deep notes which, though not absent from
liberal Protestant thinking and preaching, have been underemphasized to our great loss.
Furthermore, Christian teaching in the nineteenth and early twentieth century, and especially among
liberal Protestant theologians, accentuated the anthropocentric tendencies of the Western
tradition.
While insisting that he was not tempted by biblical literalism, Karl Barth began his dogmatics by describing the
liberal tradition of Friedrich Schleiermacher and Adolf von Harnack as «the plain destruction of
Protestant theology and the
Protestant church.»
They way Steve, Brigitte and aDK view the bible, for instance, is actually quite modren and less consistent with
tradition than cetain
liberal protestant denomination — they're calim that they are the keepers of Christian traditionals is just that: they're claim.