Religious freedom was guaranteed to
Protestants by a doctrine - separation of church and state - that was intended to deny that same freedom to Catholics.
Not exact matches
The Christian Zionist distortions of historic evangelical and orthodox theology must be debated and confronted primarily
by evangelicals but also
by mainline
Protestants, whose churches sometimes absorb these
doctrines.
I don't advertise my version here but the
doctrine confirmed
by the
Protestant Churches (see their old confessional docu - ments), the Bible, the Fathers of the Church.
In my opinion this presentation will be acceptable to official Catholic
doctrine which derives from the Council of Trent and need not be opposed either
by contemporary
Protestant Christians.
In my judgment a reworking of Christianity along progressivist lines, i.e., along lines which teach God's insistence upon democratic dogmas and which discern
doctrine - altering «Revelation» in democratic social trends, remains an ongoing potentiality, whether initiated
by «
Protestants» or «Catholics»; this follows, I hold, from Tocquevillian premises.
By the end of the 19th century the scholars of
Protestant liberalism had fully accepted the humanistic origins of the Bible, come to terms with the scientific notion of biological evolution, and were completely confident that the essential core of Christian
doctrine could be salvaged intact and re-expressed in terms relevant to the modern age.
In a poll taken
by Christianity Today in 1957, for example, among members of the
Protestant clergy who chose to call themselves conservative or fundamental, 48 % affirmed that belief in Scripture's inspiration also demanded a commitment to its inerrancy, while 52 % said they were either unsure of the
doctrine of inerrancy or rejected it outright.1 Discussion within evangelicalism concerning the inspiration of Scripture has usually focused on this point: whether or not Scripture is inerrant.
A friend of mine, speaking of the Catholic move to prune excessive Marian
doctrine and practice after Vatican II
by moving her statue to the side, observed that
Protestants moved her out the door altogether.
Yet modern
Protestant interpretations of the same issue make the Catholic
doctrine wise and prudent
by comparison.
Actually the two have been brought together in the history of Christian thought which Professor Nygren traces so superbly in his study, but all attempts at synthesis, including that of St. Augustine with his
doctrine of love as caritas, and that of the medieval theologians and mystics who saw the problem and tried to make a place for unselfish love within the Christian
doctrine, really obscured and corrupted the fundamental Christian truth which was recovered
by Luther in the
Protestant Reformation.
The
protestant responses to the «Declaration on the Unicity and Salvific Universality of Jesus Christ and the Church» recently issued
by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger's Office for the
Doctrine of the Faith (ODF) have been mostly pained surprise, sometimes anger.
Protestant responses to the «Declaration on the Unicity and Salvific Universality of Jesus Christ and the Church» recently issued
by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger's Office for the
Doctrine of the Faith have been mostly pained surprise, sometimes anger.
According to Catholic
doctrine man can not judge his justification or his eternal salvation with absolute certainty while he is still a pilgrim, and this is ultimately not contradicted
by the
Protestant doctrine of justification either, despite all controversies, because in Lutheranism, too, absolute «fiducial faith» has always been attacked.
B. Boedder's Natural Theology, London, 1891, is a handy English Catholic Manual; but an almost identical
doctrine is given
by such
Protestant theologians as C. Hodge: Systematic Theology, New York, 1873, or A.H. Strong: Systematic Theology, 5th edition, New York, 1896.)
The claim that «justification
by faith alone» is the articulus stantis et cadentis ecclesiae (the
doctrine by which the Church stands or falls) is a distinctly minority position among
Protestants who call themselves evangelicals.
He says its key
doctrine is not justification
by grace alone, the cornerstone for the
Protestant Reformers.
The
Protestant Churches keep the
doctrine, which was yet favoured
by the Early Church, which was founded
by the Lord and the apostles.
If the gospel is the
Protestant doctrine of salvation, then
by definition Catholics don't believe or preach the gospel.
The first
Protestant «project» for Brazil (
by American Methodists in the 1830s and 1840s) was a national reformation, in which the political desire for a breach with Rome would be supplemented
by a reform of
doctrine and practice stimulated
by ample distribution of the Scriptures.
As a general rule, however, the less centralized
Protestant denominations lacked formal
doctrines mandating that schooling be under their exclusive control and were more willing to pursue their educational goals within the framework created
by state - run systems.
Evangelicalism is a worldwide, transdenominational movement within
Protestant Christianity, maintaining that the essence of the gospel consists in the
doctrine of salvation
by grace through faith in Jesus Christ's atonement.