Provider Claims Dispute Work with Coding Specialist to resolve coding related disputes Make sound... Our staffing consultants combine deep - seated staffing industry best practices with home town...
Not exact matches
You expressly agree that exclusive jurisdiction for any
claim or
dispute with MomsTeam or relating in any way to your use of the Services resides in the courts of Massachusetts and you further agree and expressly consent to the exercise of personal jurisdiction in the courts of Massachusetts in connection with any such
dispute including any
claim involving MomsTeam or its parents, affiliates, subsidiaries, employees, contractors, officers, directors, telecommunication
providers and content
providers.
You expressly agree that exclusive jurisdiction for any
dispute with VetLIVE.com, or in any way relating to your use of the VetLIVE.com Site, resides in the courts of the State of Pennsylvania and you further agree and expressly consent to the exercise of personal jurisdiction in the courts of the State of Pennsylvania in connection with any such
dispute including any
claim involving VetLIVE.com, LLC or its affiliates, subsidiaries, employees, contractors, officers, directors, telecommunication
providers, and content
providers.
Stage 1 of the OC presents the greatest potential for
disputes to be contained and prevented from crystallising into actual
claims, and also has the potential to assist the parties to explore ADR processes and
providers, thereby limiting those cases which reach the later OC stages.
Oppenhoff & Partner's broad range of contentious work reflects an equally broad client roster, which includes investment and pharmaceutical companies, financial institutions and service
providers, which the team frequently represents in corporate and post-M & A
disputes, D&O liability proceedings and
claims for damages.
David has extensive experience representing serial entrepreneurs, banking institutions, financial service
providers, commercial landlords, and Fortune 20 companies in state and federal courts throughout Florida and beyond in contractual
disputes, tort
claims, evictions, and commercial foreclosures.
Lead counsel for healthcare clients (payors and
providers) in payor /
provider disputes, member
claims, contracting issues, responses to civil investigative demands, restrictive covenant enforcement and defense, and alternative
dispute resolution matters.
Service
Providers may absorb costs for which they should rightfully be compensated if the costs can only be recovered by making a
claim under the outsourcing agreement's
dispute resolution procedures: the damage to the outsourcing relationship is too high a price to pay.
She has a particular focus on advising professionals, financial service
providers and regulatory bodies in relation to
dispute management, investigations and
claims.
Successful representation of a national, publicly held
provider of commercial and residential landscaping and tree trimming services in a
dispute with an international
provider of enterprise software systems, for
claims arising out of installation and implementation problems.
Ms. Tomasco provided an overview of trends in litigation brought by
providers against managed care organizations, for example, antitrust
claims, suits involving
claims for payment under benefit assignment agreements, network participation
claims, and contract
disputes.
Representation of national
provider of wireless service for well over a decade in a variety of vendor
disputes, employment
disputes, real estate
disputes, construction
disputes, actions seeking extraordinary relief, contract
claims, and land use
disputes.
Arbitrated and mediated Insurance carrier
disputes with
providers over coding, billing and
claims payment
Practitioners must develop an array of skills that include negotiating mergers and acquisitions; representing clients in federal and state investigations and civil actions; instructing clients on certificate of need and licensing matters; advising clients on compliance and third - party payor
claims such as Medicare and Medicaid; forming and operating health care corporations and partnerships including
provider networks; representing clients in financing and securities transactions; and litigating a variety of
disputes.
Kathy has also defended an international dialysis services
provider against RICO
claims in federal court based on allegedly fraudulent billing activity, represented a pharmaceutical services
provider in a billing
dispute with a chain of nursing homes, defended home health agencies in suits brought by employees pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, and represented other
providers and associations of
providers as plaintiffs and defendants in a variety of matters in federal and state court involving issues ranging from contract interpretation to cash receipts assessments to the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
The practice's main areas of specialism are
disputes involving shareholders, directors, partnerships, and joint ventures; professional negligence
claims against professional service
providers; and cross-border
disputes.
(a) US Residents: To the fullest extent permissible by law, with the exception of
disputes pertaining to
Provider's intellectual property rights and certain statutory
claims that, pursuant to law, are not arbitrable, any
dispute of any kind between you and
Provider arising under these Terms shall be resolved through binding arbitration pursuant to the JAMS Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures on an individual basis with no class relief.