Main Outcome Measures The DSM - IV disorders, severity, and treatment were assessed with the WMH version of the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH - CIDI), a fully structured, lay - administered
psychiatric diagnostic interview.
All subjects then underwent
a psychiatric diagnostic interview designed to identify major psychiatric diagnoses for exclusion in this study.
Not exact matches
The University of Michigan Composite International
Diagnostic Interview (UM - CIDI), a revised version of the CIDI, 23 was used to measure the prevalence of the following 4
psychiatric disorders, as described in the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, third edition, revised: 24 anxiety disorder (including one or more of social phobia, simple phobia, agoraphobia, panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder); major depressive disorder; alcohol abuse or dependence; and externalizing problems that included one or more of illicit drug abuse or dependence and antisocial behaviour.
Holton and Nigg employed a rigorous study design that involved parental reports,
diagnostic interviews, and consensus of two clinical experts to screen for ADHD and additional
psychiatric disorders.
ADHD symptoms were measured through a
diagnostic interview and on a continuum, ranging from none to many, rather than in terms of a formal
psychiatric diagnosis.
The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric
Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM - IV and
Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured
diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM - IV and
interview for DSM - IV and ICD - 10.
A standardized
psychiatric evaluation conducted by specifically trained
psychiatric interviewers -
Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) in Wichita [32] and the Structured Clinical
Interview for DSM - IV Disorders (SCID) in Georgia [33].
We have a large, random sample of juvenile detainees and used a reliable measure, version 2.3 of the
Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC), 32 to determine
psychiatric diagnoses.
Children's
psychiatric disorders at baseline and the 3 - month evaluation were established by direct
interview of mothers and children using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia — Present and Lifetime Version, 22 a widely used valid and reliable
diagnostic assessment that generates DSM - IV diagnoses.
Difficulties in recruiting and retaining BSA participants by 9 months reduced the sample size.59 Self - reported questionnaires indicate the presence of depressive symptoms, but given the absence of
psychiatric interviews, this is not
diagnostic of a depressive disorder.
The healthy control subjects were screened for the absence of any DSM - IV Axis I
psychiatric disorder using the face - to - face computer - assisted
interview based on the Munich version of the Composite International Diagnostic Int
interview based on the Munich version of the Composite International
Diagnostic InterviewInterview.42
As previously described (32), a number of standardized parent - and child - report questionnaires, as well as the semistructured
diagnostic interview the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Aged Children (33), were used to generate child
psychiatric diagnoses.
All participants in the prospective study were administered the Mini International Neuropsychiatric
Interview (M.I.N.I), including the module for adult ADHD.35, 36 The M.I.N.I. is a structured diagnostic interview for DSM - IV TR and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision psychiatric d
Interview (M.I.N.I), including the module for adult ADHD.35, 36 The M.I.N.I. is a structured
diagnostic interview for DSM - IV TR and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision psychiatric d
interview for DSM - IV TR and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision
psychiatric disorders.
Anxiety, disruptive, eating, mood, and substance use disorders were assessed during adolescence and early adulthood using the
Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children.36 The parent and offspring versions of the
Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children were administered during the adolescent
interviews because the use of multiple informants increases the reliability and validity of
psychiatric diagnoses among adolescents.37, 38 Symptoms were considered present if reported by either informant.
The clinical diagnosis of hypochondriasis was made with the Structured
Diagnostic Interview for Hypochondriasis based on operationalized DSM - III - R criteria.27 Interrater agreement with this instrument is 96 %, and the univariate correlation between the interview responses and self - report questionnaire scores is 0.75.27 The DSM diagnosis of hypochondriasis specifically excludes hypochondriacal symptoms that are better explained by another, comorbid psychiatric disorder or by major medical
Interview for Hypochondriasis based on operationalized DSM - III - R criteria.27 Interrater agreement with this instrument is 96 %, and the univariate correlation between the
interview responses and self - report questionnaire scores is 0.75.27 The DSM diagnosis of hypochondriasis specifically excludes hypochondriacal symptoms that are better explained by another, comorbid psychiatric disorder or by major medical
interview responses and self - report questionnaire scores is 0.75.27 The DSM diagnosis of hypochondriasis specifically excludes hypochondriacal symptoms that are better explained by another, comorbid
psychiatric disorder or by major medical illness.
This course is based on the results of a study that used a computerized, self - administered version of the
Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children to screen for
psychiatric disorders in youth newly admitted to assessment centers in Illinois and New Jersey.
It was also notable that
diagnostic data for this investigation were based on an independent, age - appropriate, interviewer - based psychiatric interview (the PAPA) different than that used in the first set of investigations (Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Version IV — Young Child), adding further weight to these data contributing to the growing database validating pres
diagnostic data for this investigation were based on an independent, age - appropriate, interviewer - based
psychiatric interview (the PAPA) different than that used in the first set of investigations (Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Version IV — Young Child), adding further weight to these data contributing to the growing database validating presc
interview (the PAPA) different than that used in the first set of investigations (
Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Version IV — Young Child), adding further weight to these data contributing to the growing database validating pres
Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Version IV — Young Child), adding further weight to these data contributing to the growing database validating presc
Interview Schedule for Children, Version IV — Young Child), adding further weight to these data contributing to the growing database validating preschool MDD.
Inclusion in the control group required the absence of current or past
psychiatric disorders, as confirmed by
diagnostic interview.
Study of the
psychiatric diagnostic confiability by Structured Clinical
Interview for DSM - III - R / SCID Non — Patient in ambulatorial service of the school 10 hospital
The MINI-KID is a structured, lay - administered self - report
diagnostic interview for children of ages 6 to 17 years old which is designed to assess DSM - IV Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM - IV) psychiatric
diagnostic interview for children of ages 6 to 17 years old which is designed to assess DSM - IV
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM - IV) psychiatric
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM - IV)
psychiatric disorders.
Detailed
psychiatric interviews with 300 parents and children, using the
Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, yielded a one - year weighted prevalence of one or more DSM - III disorders of 22.0 % ± 3.4 %, combining diagnoses based on either the child or the parent i
Interview Schedule for Children, yielded a one - year weighted prevalence of one or more DSM - III disorders of 22.0 % ± 3.4 %, combining diagnoses based on either the child or the parent
interviewinterview.
The NIMH DISC - IV is a structured
interview to asses more than 30 common child - and adolescent
psychiatric diagnoses, according to the
diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders IV (DSM - IV).
In addition, the CD and control groups were well - characterized from a clinical perspective,
psychiatric comorbidity was carefully assessed, and
diagnostic information was obtained from multiple informants using standardized, semi-structured
interviews.
Thus, the prevalence of different
psychiatric disorders observed in our study could be higher if we had used other
diagnostic interview.
Data on
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for mental disorders were derived from administration of selected modules of the National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, version IV, a structured diagnostic interview administered by lay interviewers to assess psychiatric diagnoses of children and ad
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for mental disorders were derived from administration of selected modules of the National Institute of Mental Health
Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, version IV, a structured diagnostic interview administered by lay interviewers to assess psychiatric diagnoses of children and ad
Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, version IV, a structured diagnostic interview administered by lay interviewers to assess psychiatric diagnoses of children and ado
Interview Schedule for Children, version IV, a structured
diagnostic interview administered by lay interviewers to assess psychiatric diagnoses of children and ad
diagnostic interview administered by lay interviewers to assess psychiatric diagnoses of children and ado
interview administered by lay interviewers to assess
psychiatric diagnoses of children and adolescents.
Prevalence of
psychiatric disorders in Taiwan defined by the Chinese
Diagnostic Interview Schedule
Angold et al. [42] evaluated the prevalence generated by three different styles of
psychiatric interviews, those based on respondents (
Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, DISC), those based on the interviewers (Child and Adolescent
Psychiatric Assessment, CAPA) and
interviews based on «expert judgment» (DAWBA) applying them to the same sample of children and adolescents aged 9 — 16 years.