Ms. Webber was part of the team recognized by
Public Justice as finalists for their Trial Lawyer of the Year award in 2011 for the work done in Keepseagle.
See Brief for Trial Lawyers for
Public Justice as Amicus Curiae 10, and n. 7.
Not exact matches
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in her opinion that the law «shelters employees of private contractors that serve
public companies, just
as it shelters the
public companies» own employees.»
When prime - time hosts — who have never served our country in any capacity — dismiss facts and empirical reality to launch profoundly dishonest assaults on the FBI, the
Justice Department, the courts, the intelligence community (in which I served) and, not least, a model
public servant and genuine war hero such
as Robert Mueller — all the while scaremongering with lurid warnings of «deep - state» machinations — I can not be part of the same organization, even at a remove.
As a political philosopher who studies how abstract moral notions such as justice apply to political institutions, I am more concerned with the fact that under - counting the undocumented might introduce bias into our public polic
As a political philosopher who studies how abstract moral notions such
as justice apply to political institutions, I am more concerned with the fact that under - counting the undocumented might introduce bias into our public polic
as justice apply to political institutions, I am more concerned with the fact that under - counting the undocumented might introduce bias into our
public policy.
Growing up in a middle - class family in Manhattan, Powers had the opportunity to attend Hunter College High School, a prestigious
public school that counts Supreme Court
Justice Elena Kagan and Hamilton's Lin - Manuel Miranda
as among its illustrious alumni.
She worked
as Minister across nine Canadian government departments, and her service included the role of Vice Chair of the Treasury Board and chair of the cabinet committee for
public safety,
justice and aboriginal issues.
The John R.
Justice Student Loan Repayment Program provides up to $ 10,000 per year of law school loan repayment for state and federal
public defenders and state prosecutors who agree to remain employed
as public defenders and prosecutors for at least three years.
Join Lillian with U.S. Supreme Court
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Jeff Skoll (Skoll Foundation), Lauren Bush Lauren & Target Corp. at National Jefferson Awards Ceremony, referred to
as Nobel Prize for
Public Service
In light of this refusal to respond seriously to the substantiated and well - researched concerns of civil society, the members of the Trade
Justice Network can not accept this empty and meaningless Declaration
as anything more than
public relations.
The
Justice Department accuses the insurers of pursuing profit over the interests of the
public, casting Bertolini
as an anti-consumer CEO.
But for some black racial
justice activists, organizers, and
public figures, the reaction to the students of Stoneman Douglas has also led to another truth: Organizing around Black Lives Matter and the larger Movement for Black Lives, another youth - led movement demanding policy change in the wake of trauma, was not and has not been
as readily embraced.
As for
Justice Stevens himself, it is an arresting fact that in the animal sacrifice case he joined the opinion announcing the constitutional requirement that
public officials disassociate themselves from antireligious measures.
I see no reason why church leaders should cease promoting Christian understandings of human rights in
public settings
as a way of promoting
justice, morality, and the common good.
Denouncing them
as blind guides, fools, hypocrites and a brood of vipers, he uttered harsh
public words condemning them for their many errors, including their preoccupation with tithing on small matters and their neglect of more important things such
as justice and mercy (Matt.
Governmental indifference to contraception was soon construed to imply governmental indifference to abortion, via the misconstrual of abortion
as a matter of sexual privacy rather than
as a matter of
public justice; and the «right to abortion» soon became a defining issue in our politics.
So, the
justice suggests,
as long prayers at
public meetings don't fall into a pattern of proselytizing, denigrating nonbelievers or threatening damnation, what's the problem?
It is an attempt to identify in modes of discourse accessible to the
public those first principles of truth and
justice that are sufficiently clear
as to be adopted
as bases for
public policy and the ordering of international life.
The
justices, by an 8 - 1 vote, said Wednesday that members of Westboro Baptist Church had a right to promote what they call a broad - based message on
public matters such
as wars.
In response to the Rhetoric Society of America's inquiry — what are Pope Benedict's reasons for positioning the Catholic Church
as an essential link between enterprise and
justice, and
as a significant voice in the
public discussion of globalization — I suggest a «spiritual....
I propose that in this particular issue, where the church has had a marvellous opportunity to project itself into the
public sphere
as an institution that can be trusted, and to proclaim in deed the gospel of
justice and restoration, the church's actions have contradicted its gospel message.
The Nixon - Graham doctrine of the relation of religion to
public morality and policy,
as revealed in the White House services, has two defects: (1) It regards all religion
as virtuous in guaranteeing
public justice.
Historically, the theory was,
as articulated by Zacharias Ursinus, that «the Church... looks to the reformation and salvation of the offender; the magistrate to the execution of
justice and the
public peace.»
Insofar
as the need for defense provides just cause for
public use of the sword, it comes from the responsibility of government to protect order,
justice, and peace, not simply from the right to respond to an attacker in kind.
And
as true to hint that Mr. Astrue sees himself
as something of a
public jester, even
as he attempts to administer
justice to millions of his fellow Americans.
1) Churches need to be a voice for economic
justice for lower - income families by, for instance, advocating for more generous child and earned - income tax credits,
as well
as for the elimination of the marriage penalties embedded in many of our
public policies directed towards lower - income families.
While the
Justice made clear his own preference for pro-life
public policies, he argued that in itself democracy is neutral
as between competing positions on issues such
as abortion and euthanasia.
State the editors, «Those who know and practice... truth must ever stand
as guardians of what is essentially the Christian tradition, and call before the bar of human
justice and
public opinion those who traduce these truths of natural and special revelation.
Long before the founding of Christian
public interest law firms, such
as the Liberty Fund, The Becket Fund, and the ACLJ [American Center for Law and
Justice], the Jehovah's Witnesses were using the courts to establish liberties.
If we call ourselves Americans
as well
as Christians, we may feel a strong civic sense that what our government did in our name was the embodiment of
public justice.
In the creation of a new egalitarian community, the church
as a counter —
public of
justice names a space in which ways of
justice are modeled and formed.
The hard just war position is taken by a writer such
as Keith Pavlischek, who serves at the Center for
Public Justice in Washington.
But, then, the dirty little secret is exposed: non-religion (or secular humanism,
as Torcaso v. Watkins admitted) is just
as much a religion
as any other, except that by pretending to not be a religion, it becomes the Constitutionally established faith and religious test, not just for
public office but anything
public (
public policy, the
public square), whose content is defined by the clerisy of a five
justice «theocratic majoritarianism.»
This is the kind of censorship necessary for television, he says, «and, whatever the
justice of [Rooney's] punishment, he can take comfort in having served
as a sacrifice to the cause of
public tranquility.»
It is tempting to pass this book off
as propaganda, but no one should underestimate Carlson - Thies, who in 1992 began working, from his position at the Center for
Public Justice, for the passage of Charitable Choice.
In Cardinal Dulles» discussion of «Catholicism & Capital Punishment» he argued that
public, governmental punishment must finally be understood
as «a symbolic anticipation of God's perfect
justice.»
Just
as the lordship of Christ made demands for
public justice on office - holders in the New Testament (Luke 4:15), the same is true for those who rule
as citizens.
Just
as the state is called by God to an irrevocable task of doing
public justice, so also is the institutional church called by God to proclaim the Gospel in its fullness, administer the sacraments and to ensure that its members are living up to their calling before the face of God, who has redeemed them in Jesus Christ.
Nonetheless, we may also hold that so far
as public policy is concerned in a pluralistic society,
justice is best served by a Madisonian approach that thwarts the tyranny of the majority.
In the face of a threat to
public order, those with
public power and the responsibility for maintaining peace, even if they care about
justice,
as Pilate did, are sometimes under pressure to sacrifice
justice — and with it, all pretense of determining whose views are correct when it comes to life's big questions.
Living in
justice in this world
as a good steward of God's bounty, maintaining privacy and yet caring for every legitimate
public need, removing every vestige of exploitation, protecting the environment for today's and tomorrow's generations, and being honest in every individual transaction, all of these are covered when we push the Commandment «You shall not steal» into the very depths of our complicated and complex lives.
The first group tends to take the law, see
justice as its core expression, apply it in the
public sector (social
justice), and then see that
as kingdom work.
So here it goes: In contemporary usage I hear «kingdom» used for two primary dimensions — for
public sector social
justice activism (I call this «skinny jeans» because a pastor told me a story about his social
justice associates who wore skinny jeans) and for seeing kingdom
as God's redemptive power unleashed wherever that power is unleashed (again, I call this pleated pants kingdom because of the same story).
If religions thus eschew separate «communal power» and seek
justice in society, there is no reason why for this purpose, they should not bring their specific faith - insights regarding
public morality into dialogue and common action through secular multi-religious groups open for faith - interaction among themselves
as well
as with secular ideologies.
«Just
as Catholics for a Free Choice and other such groups suggest to the general
public that not all Catholics agree with positions adopted by their bishops on birth control, abortion and in - vitro fertilization, so will the Religious Right serve to suggest that not all Catholics accept the positions of church leaders in social
justice matters,» writes Richard J. Dowling, executive director of the Maryland Catholic Conference.
At the very least,
as Amy Black points out in «For the Sake of the Children» (a 1995 contribution to the Crossroads Monograph Series on Faith and
Public Policy), there are public - justice issues inv
Public Policy), there are
public - justice issues inv
public -
justice issues involved.
Evangelicals of a social -
justice bent have mounted like - minded projects on a smaller scale, such
as the Crossroads Program sponsored by Evangelicals for Social Action (seeded by Pew Trust money in 1992) and its ongoing series of publications on faith and
public policy.
... The
public school is
as much committed to the maintenance of
justice as is the court.50
Justice, therefore, requires equal treatment of religions in
public as well
as in private life.
This effort, like that of the NCBCPS, relies heavily on the distinction made by
Justice Thomas Clark in the 1963 Supreme Court decision forbidding devotional reading of the Bible in
public schools: «Nothing we have said here indicates that such study of the Bible or of religion, when presented objectively
as part of a secular program of education, may not be effected consistently with the First Amendment.»