More and more, the indie author market is giving traditional
publishers a run for their money and the big New York houses are going to have to innovate even more than they have in the past.
«Amazon Publishing Finally Giving Big
Publishers Run for their Money?»
Review by: A.R. Young on March 04, 2017: Finally, a book that can help indie authors give traditional
publishers a run for their money.
Not exact matches
Major
publishers are notoriously fickle about embracing new trends and give sloths a
run for their
money.
Even if the initial print
run has sold out and your book keeps selling, the
publisher will retain this
money for three royalty periods (18 months) because that's how the contract is written.
Moreover, if you have a radio show, TV show or blog, you will have to prove the
publisher that you give other writers a
run for their
money.
If one
publisher insisted on the agency model, selling Stephen King's books
for $ 9.99, they would make more
money per sale, but lose more over the long
run because another
publisher would offer their books under the usual terms, letting the retailer set the price.
Using a book manufacturer that specializes in print on demand,
publishers can get books produced in short
runs and save
money for a number of vital reasons:
This is a subsidy
publisher that is using your
money to pay
for the print
run and production costs.
The one with better bang
for the buck... Are
publishers losing
money in the long
run by charging higher prices?
As Foxit develops the eSlick further, Xiong foresees giving Amazon and others a
run for their
money, providing an alternate way
for publishers to sell their content directly to consumers.
I personally think if Remedy were to get new
publishers and pivot to pure multiplat status, they could actually realize their potential in a much stronger way & actually give ND a
run for their
money.