Not exact matches
[1] «a conjugal act which is suitable in itself for the
procreation of offspring, to which marriage is ordered by its nature and by which the spouses become one flesh», as the Code of Canon Law # 1061 § 1
puts it.
I guess then your being an «invention» of
procreation puts the damper on wishful conditioning then?
Simply
put, I hold to a position that our imago dei consists of such nature as to reflect God's sovereign creative abilities, most thoroughly expressed through
procreation but not limited to it.
Putting aside legal arguments about hidden autonomy rights in the Fourteenth Amendment, the Court justifies its decision on the basis of the «new insight» that
procreation is accidental to marriage.
Aronofsky
puts to work the tools of the horror genre (the haunted house - isolated in a forest, bumps in the night, body horror, unwelcome strangers, horror as a manifestation of marital problems) to construct a Trojan Horse from which springs a complex thesis about the commodity and vanity of celebrity, mass societal behaviour,
procreation, religion and more.