Sentences with phrase «quality keeper as»

We also need a new top - quality keeper as well, so who would be a better back - up out of Cech and Ospina?

Not exact matches

This is to say that morality is more important than politics as a keeper of social harmony, and that the quality of a population matters more than political or economic structures.

Jose will claim he's nit bothered as we are not competition however apart from getting a quality keeper the inside knowledge of Chelsea s methods and regime is invaluable, a reason jose rarely sells to his competitors in the same league.

We finally have a solid striker (even if he will take some adaptation time I think he'll be true class) in Lacazette, we have solid center backs (once they are all healthy) much better than in recent seasons, Giroud is our killer weapon off the bench rather than the key we are relying on as the main source of goals, Coquelin and Elneny are now midfield fall - back options rather than Flamini (no offense Mathieu, I appreciated your efforts, just making the obvious comparison), two high quality keepers, etc..

2 are keepers, 2 are under 21s (bellerin and chambers) and 3 are currently injured (coquelin, cazorla, alexis) leaving Gabriel, Monreal, ozil and the much maligned giroud as the only experienced outfield players with any quality and sustainable fitness.

They bring different qualities, much like alexis vs Giroud at striker... Ospina is much better at reflex saves and probably does nt get beaten from range as much as Cech does, however Cech is much more commanding in the box when it comes to crosses and corners which is vital in the physical premier league, thus its all about what you are looking for in your keeper.

(a) Good crossing from the wingers (b) A world - class DMF (c) To defend as a team (d) A rock - solid back - four (e) A new top - quality keeper (I like Cech but he's well past - it)

«Keepers We have two high quality incumbents; there can't be too many second choices in the world of the standard of Ospina, and Cech is as good as ever.

There is no debate about Liverpool desperately needs a quality goal keeper as their last guard.

Given the fact that many fans had already grown frustrated at Szczesny's perceived lack - of - development since breaking into the first - team at the Emirates at the beginning of the 2012 - 13 season, the fact that the 25 - year - old exhibited such flagrant disrespect towards the club and manager who had groomed him to become an international quality keeper by the tender age of 22 was seen as the final straw.

Moreover, they need a top quality goal keeper as well.

Also all the other keepers here are still young, so he can contribute as well by developing our goalkeepers because they are top quality.

For our defesive problems wenger has Jorou to look at as a longer term replacemnet for gallas and he has the height.He is a shrewed businessman who is not going to buy even next season.Once Chamack comes in free, almost all departments wil be covered with quality and the only signing i can see him signing at a cost is may be a cover up for Song.But there is no way he is going to spend money buying players again as he has more than enough.Am seeing him buy a keeper but i do nt know which one.I have a sleem hope that next season is ours for the taking and i pray we do nt go through these stupid champions league qualifiers at the expense of Liverpool.It will be an improvement for us from last season.

The goalkeeping department has lacked any quality in depth since 2005/2006 when the Reds had Pepe Reina as their first choice «keeper and Jerzy Dudek as back up.

It's popularly believed that (1) publishing houses serve as gatekeepers, maintaining publishing quality standards; (2) self - publishing has a lower barrier to entry, allowing people to publish junk; (3) authors self - publish as a last resort, when they fail to get past the publishing house gate - keepers, because their books aren't good enough; and (4) books published outside the publishing houses don't go through a team of book experts to be proofread, formatted, designed, etc., and so are terribly flawed by amateurish production values.

Apple already has a solid financial model that would seem to be a keeper as long as quality standards are held high on hardware and system software.