Sentences with phrase «rss trend»

RSS a trend of 0.078 C / decade.

RSS: 0.52 So, in conclusion, warming since — oh wait, our RSS trend is from 1994 to now.

We find that GISS disagrees with both RSS and UAH satellite trends on 17 - year spans (and they disagree with each other), but that there is symmetry: GISS agrees broadly more with UAH trend (though not amplitude) for the 17 years ending 1997, but more with RSS trend in the last 17 years (though again not with amplitude).

The RSS trend fits a linear regression rather well with a significantly positive trend.

The RSS satellite's orbit could continue to decay and the RSS trend could continue to be the outlier.

RSS satellite data sets were first published in 2001; by July, 2004, the RSS trend stood at 0.13 °C per decade.

In fact, the UAH data from January 1998 through present (April 2007) is (a non-significant) 0.072 ºC / decade and the RSS trend for the same period is (a non-significant) 0.012 ºC / decade (overall, from the start of the record until now, the UAH and RSS global lower tropospheric trends are (a significant) 0.15 ºC / dec and 0.18 ºC / dec, respectively).

No, you are wrong, RSS is consistent with models only if we look at global trends, but RSS trend for tropical «hot - spot» is out of 2 standard deviations limit of the model mean, just like UAH and all «uncorrected» radiosonde data sets.

RSS trend for 1979 - 2004 is outside 2 sd of model mean (see Douglas et al 2007, figure 1)(why do you use 1979 - 1999 period?).

RSS trends are actually negative since 1988.

The RSS trends are just within the range of model solutions

Also, the size of the difference in the UAH 5.6 and RSS trends suggests someone is doing something wrong.

RSS trends showing the millennial cycle temperature peak at about 2003 (14) Figure 4 illustrates the working hypothesis that for this RSS time series the peak of the Millennial cycle, a very important «golden spike», can be designated at 2003.

I'm not sure there's much point asking for comments about the general discrepancy between UAH and RSS trends, as this has been known for some time and appears to be largely related to inter-satellite calibration issues.

Not exact matches

This helps them be found by people searching for industry - related articles on social networking trend walls and blogs, as well as RSS feeds.

Articles can be upvoted by the community - that \'s you - allowing us to rank trending topics and show users exactly what \'s happening in the Android world.Ditch the RSS feeds.

FingerGaming [RSS feed] is already publishing daily news, analysis, and reviews from the swiftly burgeoning iPhone and iPod Touch gaming scene, including the latest from Steve Jobs on the iPhone Store's game expansion, early impressions of iPhone titles including Spore: Origins and iSplume, and increasing concentrations on interviews, analysis, and trends in the new business.

have launched a brand new company website (for which I can't find an RSS feed, ack), but as an example of the fun, readable content, two employees debate Nintendo's Wii Fit, with K. Thor Jensen commenting: «I understand that the «lifestyle software» trend is birthed in Japan and may seem Japan - centric, but the unexpected side effect of that movement is that it's working here and it's working elsewhere.»

For 1979 - 1999, the model's tropical T2 trends are 0.2 + / - 0.26 (95 %), RSS is 0.14 + / - 0.26, for T2LT, models 0.22 + / - 0.26, RSS: 0.17 + / - 0.26 (95 % CI, corrected for temporal autocorrelation).

It is much better to use both UAH and RSS, or HadCRUT and GISTEMP (and NCDC) than it is to simply pick the one that gives you the trend or character you prefer.

That's about to be the record showing the lowest trend, once RSS implements their newly - corrected algorithm in the TLT product.

The UAH data is showing a decreased trend, similar to RSS in timing, but less in magnitude.

«Using the [cherry flavored &; >) RSS data, which Santer used in determining his 17 - yr minimum time needed for a human global warming signal, the most recent 17 - yr trend is the lowest in the entire data series.»

I thought he might be unhappy to see: — the adjustment (in the new paper) losing the 1998 RSS high temp shown in Zeke Hausfather's older graph, so the «cooling trend» argument gets hurt, or — the newer graph having one more recent data point than the older, so the «cooling trend» argument gets hurt, or — the newer graph showing a shorter time span and so not showing the lower temps in earlier decades, so the «cooling trend» argument gets hurt, or — the newer graph isn't directly comparable to an older graph he prefers to look at without thinking about the numbers along the side, or — I du n no.

As far as I know, the 2 main sources of satellite data for temperatures in the lower troposphere are UAH and RSS, and they vastly differ in their trends in the tropical troposphere, with RSS's trend being twice as warming as the UAH trend, although they show the same trends in the remaining troposphere, resulting in a Global difference of only 0.035 C / d trend.

So you want to say that flat trend since 1996/97, according both UAH and RSS, is consistent with models?

My figure b agrees with Dan's observation that for RSS the recent trend is the lowest — .

On your further claim that the RSS data is consistent with the models, please provide us with GISS plots of the tropospheric and lower stratospheric layer average temperature data trends (corresponding to their weighting functions TLS; TTS; TMT and TLT).

If one plots the records from GISS, HADCru, RSS and UAH; GISS is the outlier, and three of the four primary global temperature measuring systems show a decrease over the most recent six years and a downward trend over the past decade; not that this establishes a significant trend yet.

In this conversation you cite unceratinty of RSS data that are almost twice larger than trend (+ -0,26), although Mears and Weinz (2005) state that error range of RSS T2LT is 0.09!!!

or RSS showing the lowest 17 - yr trend ever?

Yes, you have read correctly, the published official trend of UAH ignores the first two years of data, and so does RSS.

Tropical SST trends in HadISST are 0.1 deg C / dec, HadCRUT3v 0.11 deg C / dec, RSS T2LT is 0.17 deg C / dec.

The way to transform it into temperatures is unclear enough as to give temperature trends from UAH and RSS that differ in 0.035 C per decade.

In their trend from 1998, the two satellite series contradict each other: UAH shows +0.05 ° C per decade (a bit more than HadCRUT4), RSS shows -0.05 ° C per decade.

John Wegner wrote: > The RSS MSU Lower Troposphere temperature trend might now > be going down versus 1998.

The current differences between S+C 2LT (v5.2) and RSS 2LT trends are large precisely because of this.

One estimate of that error for the MSU 2 product (a weighted average of tropospheric + lower stratospheric trends) is that two different groups (UAH and RSS) come up with a range of tropical trends of 0.048 to 0.133 °C / decade — a much larger difference than the simple uncertainty in the trend.

The new RSS version of the 2LT record still shows a higher trend (0.19 deg / decade), with the difference being due to the methodology used to splice the different satellites.

RSS now shows a 207 month period with 0.0 trend.

But the more basic point here is that the Cowtan paper does not use the satellite time trend (which is somewhat unreliable — remember the long history of corrections, and the difference in trends between the UAH and RSS products), it only uses the satellite spatial pattern to fill the data holes.

Third, the trend for the entire RSS MSU data set is 0.18 + / - 0.06 K / decade.

So, concerning solar factor, their results confirm what we allready know from UAH and RSS cooling trends for stratosphere 1979 - onward.

To tamino # 135 — I'm guessing you rounded the figures from RSS while I used all the data and a statistical package to derive the trend.

Over the area that these cover, the satellite data trends in UAH and RSS are pretty much the same, thus verifying the data extraction algorithms of the satellite temp series.

It says in the abstract that models overestimate warming in the troposphere, and in the main text «The multimodel average tropospheric temperature trends are outside the 5 — 95 percentile range of RSS results at most latitudes.»

As the science continues to mount up against AGW (i.e. latest Aqua satellite data supporting «negative» feedback and GISS, UAH, RSS, Hadley data showing no warming since 1998 and a trend towards cooling), I see «doubters» getting rounder and rounder, and Pachauri, Gore, Hansen, et al getting flatter and flatter.

GISS, HadCRUt3, RSS and UAH all show no statistically significant trend in mean gobal temperature at 95 % confidence limits for the most recent 15 years.

Of course, everyone likely knows by now that the big news of late has been the v4 update to the RSS satellite data set, which raised the trend in their data by about 60 %.

If you plot satellite data (UAH or RSS) over same years there is no trend to speak of after a margin of error is included.