Sentences with phrase «rw did»

Also RW did provide a platform for Macchiarini to present his views.

Ox or Perez on the right instead of Ramsey because whoever was on that RW did not tracking back enough and Bellerin was exposed many times.

am really missing the real Aaron, the rw doesn't suit him like in the middle of the pack.

RW You do in fact write stories as you did for your previous show in 1990.

RW Do you think that that's why some people have trouble looking at your work over a period of time?

Not exact matches

RW: With the current interest in buying electric cars, plus more wind turbines being built and growing Chinese infrastructure, does this mean the fundamentals are falling into place for rising copper prices and copper company share values?

RW: Do you think that many of the mainstream stocks are now fully valued or overvalued and due for a correction?

RW: Do you think that the dispute over the Trans Mountain pipeline will ultimately wind up in the court?

RW: Besides the BC NDP government, what about the objections of municipalities such as Burnaby that don't want the pipeline?

As a consequence he would not be able to explain how a man could ever be guilty for something done by him years ago, how there could be an ethics of obligation, political action, artistic production, or an historical process» (RW 331).

RW Garcia continues to expand its distribution network as it develops new and creative better - for - you products, which Garcia says the company does on a regular basis.

Do tell me again about all the quality wingers we possess, and how buying a RW wouldn't be a good investment.

As good as Ox is I don't think he should be 1st choice RW.

and get a player to play on rw why didn't we get mikhtarian??? we could have easily got him.

Chambo doesn't produce enough end product to justify being the starting RW.

I have always believed in J Campbell but I can't fault Wenger for keeping him on th th all the while because it we found a balance with Ramsey on the RW and surely he didn't want to disrupt a working formular / formation.

But did we really need another midfielder when we have clearly needed a CF, CB and RW for too long?

The end goal for the Ox was to get experience at going past players as a RW and now experience in defending as a RWB, as a CM he will need to be able to do both consistently.

in case both are unavailable who do you guys think should play RW?

I think in our whole squad we do nt have RW or LW, selling both chamberlain and walcott, was not a good idea.

He got into a great shooting position today in RW and takes too many chances doesn't get the shot fired in the end.

We do have Welbeck and Chamberlain fighting for that RW spot.

griezmann or reus, griezmann would be my choice # 35m # 40m should do and he scores plenty of goals and can play lw, rw, cf much better than lacazette and he's only 24 53 app 25 goals in all comps this season

I do think he will suit us as DM not as RW being miss used kind of Ramsey manager's deluded imposition.

maolas deal isn't done wenger is also interested in nastasic against everton hope wenger drops cazorla & start ox + maybe Campbell on rw & sanchez upfront

Walcott has been poor and just because it's his 10th anniversary doesn't mean he deserves to start ahead of Campbell on the RW.

We only need to add quality for ST, CB and possibly RW — and not just any player, only top top player count, especially the ST position I don't want to litter our squad with expensive panic buy which add no value to the team — Balotelli, Benteke, Bony,... I rather stick with Giroud and use Sanchez, Akpom (he deserve a chance) as backup than spending 30M on Bony

All we can do is try to add any super quality players we can (RB + RW being the 2 positions to avoid signings) and hopefully keep playing to our best in the big games.

Why spend all that money on him when you have problems in DM, RW AND CM please Wenger stop this and bring in lemar and a powerful RW, DM AND powerful CB we need players who can defend crosses and not be knocked out cold like what matic did to bellerin.

Because evidently he doesn't rate Theo or anyone else to fulfill the RW role offering something offensive AND covering the RB who is young Bellerin.

ramsey back at RW versus MU (altho ox does well versus MU)

Ramsey does just about Nothing on the RW...... only constantly drifting in...... Vulnerably Leaving bellerin to play both RW and RB

i think when Ramsey comes back we should rotate him with Carzola against weaker teams so that the little magician doesn't get burn out while Campbell n The Ox will continue a rw.

Yeah he may have played on the RW most of his career but that doesn't mean he shouldn't have been able to get at least 10 - 15 goals a season from that position.

Some people think Chamberlain is so good he should be playing RW full time, I don't think that is true.

Sanchez (LW) Campbell — What Wenger is probably going to go for Gibbs (LW) Sanchez (RW)-- This got us the goal against Spurs and balances the team well... Campbell (LW) Sanchez (RW)-- This could work but I really don't see it happening Sanchez (LW) Ozil (RW)-- This allows Cazorla to be in a more goal scoring position as CAM.

I still believe this is a position we really need to improve BUT we'll end up overloading our RW with quality when we do.

As it's stand now, no youth Gunner has yet been drafted to the RW as I thought the Boss will do as another option to Ramsey before Wilshere returned.

It's a shame Fekir of Lyon got injured when he did he would have definitely been in the French squad and another great candidate for the RW.

Theo is having a good season but as I have pointed out, he does tend to have 1 good then 1 bad season, we need a RW who will push Theo and replace him if his form does dip or eventual injury.

Ramsey scores goals when he plays in the centre, the reason he does is because he has more space and understands how to play in tight space from experience on the RW.

Our 3 back is just so wrong.We don't have natural wingbacks even in this formation.It also seems to me that lots of people here believe if you're good at right or left fullback then automatically you're good at RWB / LWB which quite frankly is untrue.That's why Oxlade Chamberlain can be considered at RWB but not right back.At RWB or LWB you're asking too much in terms of attack from Bellerin and Kolasinac.A proper wing back can be viewed as a more defensive winger which quite frankly none of them are and they don't possess the flexibility too to play that way.Our midfielders are also not disciplined enough because in 3 back there's a huge gap in the centre of the field that must be covered by our CM's so indiscipline only means disaster.We also have Ozil who looks like he's playing at RW in 3 back.In that we're limiting his impact because Ozil takes on his man because he wants to not because he likes to.You can't play such players at the wing.He's a proper No. 10 who likes to be given freedom.That's why Ozil plays likes he's lazy on the ball and stuff.It's because he wants to be free and for that you need to put him at No. 10.

There are no excuses that we do nt have any other signings besides Cech, or why we play Ramsey at RW.

he does not need to play either caz or ramsey on RW when he can have bellerin.

He will play the positions that Mihki has been playing, be it RW in a 4231, or possibly behind the striker, or RW in a 433 [all of which Mikhi has done].

Also, Ox has shown he can do the job at RW.

Big up to Joel Campbell that RW is yours kid well done again.

Next point, Ramsey played much better at RW than Chambers did at CB.

Ozil seems fired up in a few statements iv read this morning so hoping he does fire on all cylinders with Campbell on Rw n Walcott on LW....

Now, knowing there isn't really enough matches to assess his ST ability, I presume you mean how well he has done as RW and what qualities as RW could be used to assess him as a ST.